similar to: @ERROR: auth failed on module -- PROBLEM SOLVED!

Hiya, I can see it's a regular subject on this list. I, like others wanted to use rsync to synchronise two block devices (as it happens one lvm volume and one nbd device served by qemu-img on a remote host from a qcow2 disk image so that I can keep the old versions) As I couldn't find any report of it being done successfully, I'm just sharing my findings as it might benefit others.

People of cygwin & rsync, I recently attempted to get cygwin and rsync working to solve a backup/mirroring need in my computer life. Well, as you might guess, I ran into a little but of trouble. Strangely enough, rsync seemed to be regularly hanging when I attempted to do a "get" (sycronize a remote to a local dir). Well, considering I want to automate this, that was not going

Hi, I'm trying to get rsync 2.5.6 to authenticate users via openldap-2.0.23. I was looking through the mailing list archives and found a patch for rsync-2.4.6 that does this for me. I was just wondering if this is still valid, or if there has been a new patch or new implementation that has superceded this patch. Any help would be great. The message I am referring to is as follows:

We use rsync to update an nfs server. After an update, we noticed that a large number of clients didn't see the updated data. It took me a while to be able to reliably reproduce this problem, but it happens on old and new versions of rysnc. It also happens across all the platforms we use here (sun/linux/netapp). This shows the problem: [Note my home directory is NFS mounted]

I have a rsync server set up on a win2k server and a win xp pro computer is my client. It's working very well doing the anonymous transfers. However, I've tried setting up a password file and not having any success. rsyncd.conf on my server: use chroot = false strict modes = false hosts allow = * [serverbu] auth users = user path = c:/serverbu read only = no list = no secrets file =

Hallo, i am verry sorry about my bad engllish. But i trie my best... I trie to setup an Backupserver. If i use this rsync -varpog -e ssh /home/www/web6 217.172.xxx.xxx:/home/www/web6 the Server is asking me fore Password. If i use this rsync -varpog -e ssh --stats /home/www/web6 217.172.xxx.xxx:/home/www/web6 --password-file=host1.pwd the Server is asking me too fore Passwort. How i can bring

Hi all, This isn't a bug, its just a lapse in the documentation. I just got a script going that repeats every 5 seconds, that uses rsync to send data from A, running Ubuntu V6.06.1, to B, running cygwin. I got stuck on the issue of preventing the password prompt from interrupting the script. The problem is that the man pages are misleading, they suggest that RSYNC_PASSWORD and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12806 Bug ID: 12806 Summary: Deleting in a row of hardlinked snapshots resets file permissions. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi As I want to automate my Desktop backup process, I'm currently trying to finilize a CMD (Windows XP batch) file in order to save different data (outlook.pst, \desktop, \docs, \Favorites ....). My problem is that even with this parameter SET RSYNC_PASSWORD=xxxx It still ask me for a password, blocking of course all the process automation. I'm running either on my Linux backup box

Hello all please apologize that I repost this problem again. I tried to get some help several times on the list but did not find/get a solution. I am still struggling to setup different quotas for namespaces. In addition to the default "INBOX" namespace I have created a namespace called "MailArchive" which should have its own quota value of 5G per user. At first I

The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz There's also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature of the file; the public key is available on the

On 02 Nov 2016, at 22:02, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > why wouldn't it be able to use the ~/MAILARCHIVE/ filesystem space? > > The other indexes etc seem to get built there. It's not about adding an index there, but about trying to open "MAILARCHIVE" itself as a folder. fts-lucene attempts to use an existing folder's indexes for

Mr. Gowda, Please review the following prior posts: "HOW TO: Migrating users' locally-stored profiles from one domain or workgroup to a new domain" http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-December/115326.html http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-December/115413.html Note that I have only performed this migration where the users had locally-stored profiles. If you are

Hi, I have awaited the new release inorder to use the -"-partial-dir" option. But after testing it seems that it does not behave like it says on the tin. It will correctly move and rename the interrupted file to the declared directory, but it will not attempt to use it when the client attempts to rsync the file again. I have a Solaris 8 box running as a server (Matthew), and another

FWIW it DOES work on my default NAMESPACE, just not the #ARCHIVE/ NAMESPACE. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > It's ALWAYS failed on the other NAMESPACE. > > Some of the logging looks weird as well for the 2nd namespace: > > Nov 2 12:32:03 thebighonker dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<mrm>, > method=PLAIN,

I presently have a Samba server (3.0.21b) set up as a member server in an NT4 domain (with a real Windows NT4 PDC). We are migrating to an Active Directory domain (with a real Windows 2003 domain controller). We have set up a two-way trust between the old NT4 domain "CLUNKY" and the new ADS domain "SLEEK" (aka sleek.local). The Samba server is a member of the CLUNKY domain

It looks like fts-lucene wants to write some information into INBOX's index files. But your archive namespace doesn't have a working INBOX. Maybe it would work if you create "#ARCHIVE/inbox"? > On 02 Nov 2016, at 20:13, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > one other thing, fts_autoindex does NOT appear to be working on the > #ARCHIVE/ NAMESPACE.

This might be a stupid question, but I ask only because I can't think of a good reason... Why do so many vendors' builds of Samba not include libnss_wins, the WINS/NetBIOS name resolution library? I find that it is very helpful for my Linux/Samba servers to be able to resolve hostnames by WINS. It also seems to improve domain browsing performance dramatically to have the library present

Hi, all Based on my gcc plugin port to windows (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E9E5897.8030001%40gmail.com&forum_name=mingw-users <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E9E5897.8030001%40gmail.com&forum_name=mingw-users> and

It appears that you cannot include groups from trusted domains in the 'valid users =' directive on a share. Here is the scenario as I experienced it (names have been changed to protect the innocent): Configuration: - Samba 3.0.21b as a member server in a real NT4 domain (security = domain) called 'NTDOMAIN' - NTDOMAIN has a two-way trust with Windows 2003 Active Directory