Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "rsync-2.6.2pre1: In clientname.c `AI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared"
2004 Apr 01
1
[patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator: Alex Vasylenko
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 i386
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16
>Description:
rsync does reverse name
2003 Jul 24
0
make fails all versions > 2.4.8 on older linux machine (clientname.o)
hi
i'm trying to update an older rsync version due to some minor errors
during syncing with an up to date version (2.5.6) of rsync.
my problem is that the make process actually won't finish, here is the
output:
clientname.c: In function `client_addr':
clientname.c:72: warning: implicit declaration of function `getnameinfo'
clientname.c:73: `NI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared
2020 Feb 15
6
[Bug 3120] New: Codespell report for "openssh" (on fossies.org)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3120
Bug ID: 3120
Summary: Codespell report for "openssh" (on fossies.org)
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.2p1
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: Miscellaneous
Assignee:
2002 Apr 02
3
getaddrinfo() problem with AIX 4.3.3 and rsync 2.5.2?
I had to apply the following patch to the clientname.c check_name() function
before I could successfully use "hosts allow" in rsyncd.conf. Without the
patch I kept getting "rsync: forward name lookup for ... failed: Host not
found"
errors. These errors were produced by the rsync daemon, and putting in a
debugging statement revealed that the port_buf being used had a large
2004 Apr 30
1
Code question (canohost.c)
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote:
> In article <Pine.BSO.4.44.0404292059520.953-100000 at etoh.eviladmin.org> (at Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:26 -0500 (CDT)), Ben Lindstrom <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> says:
>
> > Be that true.. then one should review the usage of it in sshconnect.c
> > which is the other place we do it.
>
2003 Oct 28
4
simple compile
I could not find this question anywhere, but I apologize if it is and I
just missed it.
Running an Alpha, OSF1 V5.1 1885
configure went fine.
compile failed:
cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c lib/getaddrinfo.c -o
lib/getaddrinfo.o
cc: Error: lib/getaddrinfo.c, line 182: In this statement, "EAI_MAX" is
not declared. (undeclared)
if (ecode < 0 || ecode > EAI_MAX)
2002 Aug 19
0
Can not compile rsync
I'm getting following error while compiling rsync
Can anyone help me .
I'm running Alpha Server with TRU64 5.1
any help will be appreciated
cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c rsync.c -o rsync.o
cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c generator.c -o generator.o
cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c receiver.c -o receiver.o
cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c
2007 Jan 06
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r708 - in trunk: . clients server
With the Ipv6 patch (r708), I get:
upsclient.c: In function `upscli_connect':
upsclient.c:469: `AI_ADDRCONFIG' undeclared (first use in this function)
upsclient.c:469: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
upsclient.c:469: for each function it appears in.)
Even if it doesn't break IPv4 support, it may break portability, as
IPv6 seems to require specific functions that are
2002 Nov 05
2
2.5.6 release
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote:
> > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August
> > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there
> > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for
> >
2011 Mar 18
1
[PATCH] s3: Add "spoolss backchannel" parameter
---
.../smbdotconf/printing/spoolssbackchannel.xml | 16 ++++++++++++++++
source3/include/proto.h | 1 +
source3/param/loadparm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
source3/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
2004 Jan 19
0
rsync 2.6.0 and Solaris 8
Trying to build rsync 2.6.0 on Solaris 8 (gcc 3.3.2) has revealed that
some of the EAI_ defines exist on Solaris, but not all of them. This
causes lib/getaddrinfo.c to fail compilation as EAI_MAX (and some others)
is undefined.
The patch below fixes this issue, but I haven't tested the specific error
conditions represented by the defines.
Bryan
--- lib/addrinfo.h.orig 2001-12-05
2002 Mar 22
0
Bug in compile of rsync 2.5.4 on Tru64 UNIX V5.1a using cc on AlphaServer 1000 5/300
Hi Paul, your suggestion about batch.c got by the compiler without a
peep and it got much farther along again with complaint from cc until....
[root@hyperion: rsync-2.5.4]#CC=cc; export CC; ./configure
configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.4
checking build system type... alphaev5-dec-osf5.1
checking host system type... alphaev5-dec-osf5.1
checking target system type... alphaev5-dec-osf5.1
checking for
2003 Dec 09
1
Make Fails on Cobalt Qube 2
All;
I am using the cobalt Qube 2 which uses a Cobalt OS with is supposedly a RedHat Linux 4.2 variant. I can not compile the new rsync version 2.5.7 as I always fail my make with the following error:
clientname.c: In function `client_addr':
clientname.c:72: warning: implicit declaration of function `getnameinfo'
clientname.c:73: `NI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared (first use this function)
2002 Apr 08
1
compilation fails on Cobalt RaQ2
Configure seems to work fine with no options passed, but a make attempt
fails in clientname.c:
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c clientname.c -o clientname.o
clientname.c: In function `client_addr':
clientname.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function `getnameinfo'
clientname.c:56: `NI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared (first use this function)
clientname.c:56: (Each
2014 Apr 17
1
samba4 bind9_dlz and dhcp
Hai,
?
A bit off topic in the samba forum, but i thinks this is the best place to ask.
?
Im having?some troubles to get the dhcp server fully working with samba4.
I dont think this is a samba problem, but as i did say here maybe the best placy to ask..
?
It works, but not totaly. The strange thing is for example.
?
My debian client is now working.? It adds and deletes as it should.? No
2001 Jun 09
2
[PATCH] Make "-L" local ports bind to "127.0.0.1" in openssh-2.9p1
diff -u -r -N openssh-2.9p1/channels.c openssh-2.9p1-ajf.1/channels.c
--- openssh-2.9p1/channels.c Tue Apr 17 14:14:35 2001
+++ openssh-2.9p1-ajf.1/channels.c Wed Jun 6 23:25:36 2001
@@ -1815,13 +1815,25 @@
/*
* getaddrinfo returns a loopback address if the hostname is
* set to NULL and hints.ai_flags is not AI_PASSIVE
+ *
+ * Oh yeah? Setting hostname to NULL and hints.ai_flags to
+
2020 Jul 05
2
same changes in the DHCP to DNS script
I am "playing" around with the DNS update script from the Wiki
(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9)
and made a "few" changes, which I think could be important.
1. the script dhcp-dyndns.sh should give back the control to dhcpd as
soon as possible; therefore I am using a second bash-script (dyndns.sh)
to fork of the main script
2004 May 27
0
compiling on HP-UX
Hi, everybody here!
I hope not all is old stuff, because I only scanning subjects
fast in this list. (and sorry for my worse english, too.)
1) rsync 2.6.0 on HP-UX (HP-UX server B.11.00 U 9000/803)
Running as server: crashed always after receiving data.
The data is transmitted correctly, and the server dies
afterwards. (rsync2.5.7 works anyway)
(about rsync2.6.2 later)
2) compiling
2015 Jun 25
0
Using isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba4 internal DNS
El 24/06/15 a les 22:12, Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
>> I appreciate all the responses. I do not want to lose the ability for
>> clients to update DNS. It appears I will if I follow the link posted.
>
> No, there's no problem, since the script waits 5 seconds in order to
> give the client time to update its record. And if the client doesn't do
> it, the the script
2017 Feb 02
0
Bug#771441: [PATCH tftpd-hpa] tftpd: don't use AI_CANONNAME and AI_ADDRCONFIG to resolve addresses for bind
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used,
> which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also
> AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to
> connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to
> start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is