similar to: Where is my bottleneck?

Abel, In have the same issue when I have burned the image to an 800MB CF Disk. All it displays is GRUB CLI in a continuous stream. Seshu -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of abel Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject:

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 12/08/2014 12:18:50 PM: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > To: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> > Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, kvm at vger.kernel.org, Alex > Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Yossi > Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 12/08/2014 12:18:50 PM: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > To: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> > Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, kvm at vger.kernel.org, Alex > Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Yossi > Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 20/08/2014 01:57:10 PM: > > Results: > > > > Netperf, 1 vm: > > The polling patch improved throughput by ~33% (1516 MB/sec -> 2046 MB/sec). > > Number of exits/sec decreased 6x. > > The same improvement was shown when I tested with 3 vms running netperf > > (4086 MB/sec -> 5545

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 20/08/2014 01:57:10 PM: > > Results: > > > > Netperf, 1 vm: > > The polling patch improved throughput by ~33% (1516 MB/sec -> 2046 MB/sec). > > Number of exits/sec decreased 6x. > > The same improvement was shown when I tested with 3 vms running netperf > > (4086 MB/sec -> 5545

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

Hi! I've been giving support for streaming and streamcasting over HTTPS... Everything started while giving streaming support to my website. When I read a console error (or was it a warning?) on Chrome, when the browser accessed to an http:// resource from an https:// domain. Then I decided to fix it by the clean way. I don't need official support yet... but if you don't mind to

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is

I'm trying to get my network setup as streamlined as possible. I ran a brain-dead-simple speed test of Samba and I'm very confused by the results. Here's my setup: Fast new WinXP Pro machine NetGear GA311 gigabit ethernet ^ | dedicated gigabit ethernet line (no switch) v RTL8169 gigabit ethernet Relatively fast new Debian Linux machine I set up ramdisks on both

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > According to the DisplayPort standard, LTTPRs have two operating > modes: > - non-transparent - it replies to DPCD LTTPR field specific AUX > requests, while passes through all other AUX requests > - transparent - it passes through all AUX requests. > > Switching between this two modes is done by the DPTX by

Looking at both i915 and nouveau DP drivers, both are setting the first LTTPR (if found) in transparent mode first and then in non-transparent mode, just like the DP v2.0 specification mentions in section 3.6.6.1. Being part of the standard, setting the LTTPR in a specific operation mode can be easily moved in the generic framework. So do that by adding a new helper. Then, the msm DP driver is

I've configured asterisk 1.4 to use imap storage for voice-mail and while I'm happy with it generally speaking it really seem to hammer the IMAP server. It appear, from the IMAP server logs that it's polling the imap server every *second* for mailbox updates for the users' voice-mail folders. Is it really necessary to do this once a second? Is this tunable anywhere? Thanx, b.

Hi, I have recently upgraded from OpenSSH-3.5 to OpenSSH-3.8 on my Red Hat 6.2 servers. I use radius (pam_radius_auth) for ssh authentication. Since the upgrade ssh1 (putty 0.52) logins are failing. I've come to the conclusion that pam is skipping the radius section of the config file and is falling back to standard unix authentication. Is there any way of making ssh1 work with radius on

Hello there!!, Am looking for a manual or documentation that explain how to buy a DID number and how to configure it with Asterisk, and when some body call to that DID number Asterisk answer with a automatic operator.... Some body know about this manual? I already search in the web but nothing yet... Regards, Abel.

Hello all. Does anyone have any suggestions for making centos cloud images that can automatically repartition the root device to resize the filesystem? All the Ubuntu UEC images do this, so using the same image, you can launch cloud instances of a variety of flavors and the VM instance will repartition the root disk and resize the fs. The Ubuntu images utilize scripts in the initramfs dpkg that

On 24-12-11 15:42:27, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > +/** > > + * drm_dp_lttpr_set_transparent_mode - set the LTTPR in transparent mode > > + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel > > + * @enable: Enable or disable transparent mode > > + * > > + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.

Model: Tripp-lite OMNIVS1500 Error: Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.2.1- Network UPS Tools - Tripp Lite OMNIVS and SMARTPRO driver 0.11 (2.2.1-) Warning: This is an experimental driver. Some features may not function correctly. Detected a UPS: unknown/unknown libusb_set_report() returned -1 instead of 8 Could not reset watchdog. Please send model information to nut-upsdev mailing

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:18:35PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2024, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 24-12-11 15:42:27, Johan Hovold wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > >> > >> > +/** > >> > + * drm_dp_lttpr_set_transparent_mode - set the LTTPR in transparent mode >