similar to: Welcome to my hometown [#1503726]

Dear Sir/Madam, Hello, and thank you for contacting eHarmony Customer Care. This is an automated response to let you know that we received your email and are working to give you a thoughtful and informative reply. Due to tremendous growth we are experiencing a high volume of inquiries. We will reply within 2-3 days. We want you to know that we are working hard to shorten this response time

Hello and thank you for your email. We strive to respond to all email inquiries within one business day. If your issue cannot wait that long, please call us at 877-438-8966. Our hours are 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, Monday through Friday. For reference, your assigned case ID is:1531403 -----Original Message----- From: r-help at hypatia.math.ethz.ch [r-help at

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, g wrote: > On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >>> It's a desktop in an old house. >>> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >>> but the third prong is ungrounded. >> >> not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless >> the GFI is wired

On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> It's a desktop in an old house. >> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >> but the third prong is ungrounded. > > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless > the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. very. it defeats

On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > It's a desktop in an old house. > The outlets have ground-fault protection, > but the third prong is ungrounded. > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. you might get a 3-prong-to-2-prong adapter and plug the PC into that, leaving the ground

I can set up and access a dovecot pop3 account using outlook express fine. I can telnet into it fine. However, GFI FaxMaker is failing to log in. I assisted a client in switching his web site, including email from one server (FreeBSD) which was using Cyrus to a Redhat 4.0 server using dovecot version 0.99.11 Here's the listing of dovecot -n: dovecot -n Usage: dovecot [-F] [-c <config

Hi, I'm having some strange issues when using cp in my rsync script. It seems there may be links breaking or something. Before running the actual rsync I run the following command in my script: cp -al /backup/Current /backup/$prevday Then I rsync from the source to /Current So shouldn't all my previous days have hard links back to the original /backup directory? Sometimes the

I'm working on the code to handle GC tracing of "intermediate values" (as described in the GC doc), and I've run into a weird problem. (Note, this has nothing to do with the patch I have proposed, this error occurs with regular old pointer-allocas.) The exception I am getting occurs in this code here in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) {

Hi Talin, I think that the framework for GC assumes llvm.gcroot to be in the first block. If it is not the case in your example, it will break these assumptions. Nicolas On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on the code to handle GC tracing of "intermediate values" (as > described in the GC doc), and I've run into a

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> The introspection requests (KVM_REQ_INTROSPECTION) are checked by any introspected vCPU in two places: * on its way to guest - vcpu_enter_guest() * when halted - kvm_vcpu_block() In kvm_vcpu_block(), we check to see if there are any introspection requests during the swait loop, handle them outside of swait loop and start swait again.

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This is needed to filter #PF introspection events. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This is needed for the KVMI_EVENT_MSR event. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This is needed for the KVMI_EVENT_MSR event, which is used notify the introspection tool about any change made to a MSR of interest. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert

Hi, I''m currently stuck with a problem I just can''t find a clever solution for. I checked every tutorial, issuetracker, API reference I could find but found nothing to "enlighten" me --> I desperately need your help :-). My Question is: is it possible to use nested forms for habtm associations? --> Here some more info about what I wanted to do and what failed

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This function is needed for kvmi_update_ad_flags() and kvm_page_track_emulation_failure(). kvmi_update_ad_flags() uses the the existing guest page table walk code to update the A/D bits and return to guest (on SPT page faults caused by guest page table walks when the introspection tool write-protects the guest page tables).

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> The introspection requests (KVM_REQ_INTROSPECTION) are checked before entering guest or when the vCPU is halted. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Mircea C?rjaliu <mcirjaliu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Mircea C?rjaliu <mcirjaliu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Adalbert Laz?r

From: ?tefan ?icleru <ssicleru at bitdefender.com> The introspection tool can use this to set access restrictions for a wide range of guest addresses. Signed-off-by: ?tefan ?icleru <ssicleru at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Based on the common structure (kvmi_vcpu_hdr) used for all vCPU commands, the receiving thread validates and dispatches the message to the proper vCPU (adding the handling function to its jobs list). Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Based on the common structure (kvmi_vcpu_hdr) used for all vCPU commands, the receiving thread validates and dispatches the message to the proper vCPU (adding the handling function to its jobs list). Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> This command returns the memory type for a guest physical address. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> ---