similar to: File walking issue?

Hi everybody - I'm trying to write a Perl wrapper for some rsync tasks that need doing. Problem is, there's some sort of odd interaction going on between Perl and the daemon mode communication for the rsync client, and I'm at my wit's end in trying to figure it out. Here's the Perl script: #####################################################

Here's another easy rsync question (I am trying to make sense of some stuff): Let's say I have this burp file, which I set the follow uid/gid: raub@kushana-13>ls -l burp -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody4 noaccess 44800 Feb 18 13:07 burp raub@kushana-14> When I move it to katri, since it does not have those uid/gid defined, it just spits them out as the appropriate numbers (that were

Hi all, I would like to create a Pass that given an IR instruction walks starting from that instruction up to the main function to identify all the functions call that have been made to call that instruction. Is it possible? What kind of Pass should I create? Thanks Best, Simone Simone Atzeni simone.at at gmail.com +1 (801) 696-8373

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

I am rsyncing 1tb of data each day. I am finding in my testing that actually removing the target files each day then rsyncing is faster than doing a compare of the source->target files then rsyncing over the delta blocks. This is because we have a fast link between the two boxes, and that are disk is fairly slow. I am finding that the creation of the temp file (the 'dot file') is

Hi, I hope I have not been google-incompetant, but I have been unable to find an explicit answer a case I am concerned about. If am rsyncing a file and I have the the following sequence of events happen in the same second 1. rsync starts 2. rsync sends some chunk of data to the other end 3 a local process modifies the chunk that has just been sent I have seen statements that rsync does

Hello, I have a general administrative question concerning Samba shares. I have a large amount of data that about 25 users have limited access to. I only want these users to have access to a sub-set of this data, but I also only want the users to see that which they have access to. So, for example, suppose that the share looks like thus: /smbshare /smbshare/dir1 /smbshare/dir2

Hi all, I'm developing a novel language that has historically used LLVM for code generation, behind a custom self-hosted front-end. The runtime for this language offers a garbage collector. In the past I've been on 32-bit Windows where precise garbage collection is relatively straightforward (as long as FPO is disabled). Walking the stack is a simple bit of pointer chasing and some

Hi all, I got some help from James Edward Gray II on the RSpec TextMate bundle. For those of you who don''t know James, he runs the Ruby Quiz and also maintains the official TM bundle. Per a couple of patches from him and some advice that I acted on, many of the shortcuts have changed. The bad news is you''ll have to learn new shortcuts. The good news is that the new shortcuts

Il 02/07/20 15:02, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: > > > On 7/2/20 3:22 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: >>> I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being >>> modified while being transmitted.? This has happened maybe three >>> times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal

Thanks John. I guess I will use a ModulePass, so when I am implementing the “runOnModule” function, do I have to loop through all the functions, for each functions all the BasicBlocks and for each BasicBlock all the instructions or given the Module I have to call the CallGraph directly? Is there an example out there? I can’t find anything. Thanks. Simone > On Feb 24, 2015, at 13:29, John

I felt certain there was an option to do this, but I cannot find it. I want to rsync a directory on machine A over to machine B, and then rsync the directory on machine B back to machine A. The idea is this: I read my email using mutt, which is set to save my email in ~/Mail in maildir format. This means that each message is in its own file, instead of being appended to an existing file.

On 2/25/15 10:51 AM, Simone Atzeni wrote: > Thanks John. > > I guess I will use a ModulePass, so when I am implementing the “runOnModule” function, > do I have to loop through all the functions, for each functions all the BasicBlocks and for each BasicBlock all the instructions If you know the Instruction, you can get it's basic block using Instruction::getParent(), and then get

Howdy, Rsync has been churning away for 45 mins, presumably bulding an in-core list of files to be copied to the destination. This is a very very large filesystem we are copying locally - approximately 4.2million files (WebCT). The resident process size for rsync has grown to 72Mb. - is this normal behaviour for a file system this size, and does rsync have the ability to handle such a large

Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely avoids all memmoves. In my simple local test of rsyncing 57MB of 10 local files, memmoved bytes went from 18MB to zero. I haven't tested this for a big variety of file cases. I think that this will always reduce the memmoves involved with walking a large

Hi, all. This is my first post to the list, so please forgive me if this is an old issue. I scoured the mailing list archives by hand and could find no mention of it, and the official FAQ-o-matic mentions it, but doesn't offer a fix that works for me. I've set up an rsync daemon on Windows NT4 by installing the latest cygwin. Using the cygwin1.dll and rsync.exe, I'm able to connect

Hi Mahdi, Did you get a chance to verify this fix again? If this fix works for you, is it OK if we move this bug to CLOSED state and revert the rebalance-cli warning patch? -Krutika On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan at outlook.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Yes, i forgot to upgrade the client as well. > > I did the upgrade and created a new volume,

I have a server 192.168.0.14 and the directory I wish to share is /home/photo I can mount from 192.168.0.1 with mount -t smbfs -o "username=photo" //192.168.0.14/photo /mnt/smbshare it prompts me for a password and I can see the contents of the share but I cannot write to it. Any pointers gladly recieved kind regards Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to

Hi Herbie, thanks for you answer and explanation. > > Also, if any of the functions are external, you are completely stuck (unless you put everything together with lld). I am indeed having a problem regarding external function. I my program is just one file everything work and I can access all the functions. However, if it has multiple files I have a lot of unresolved pointers to

Hello everyone, I have a question regarding syncing of large files. We have a setup where we need to sync a 500GB file with changes in random blocks. The changes are made in a manner, so moving blocks is not probable (actually it will never happen). As I understand it, the way rsync works is: - remote server calculates all checksum blocks and transmits these to client - local client calculates