similar to: Autoreply:

======================================================== This is an automated response to your mail CD Freaks Forum Helpdesk - helpdesk@cdfreaks.com http://club.cdfreaks.com ======================================================== Dear visitor, Thank you for contacting us. Due to the amount of questions we cannot answer all your questions personally. This

Thank You for your Email. Please be advised that I am currently out of the office on holidays and will be returning on Wednesday August 9th 2006. If this email is of urgent nature please email sales at nucleus.com and someone will respond as soon as they can. You can also contact sales via telephone at 209-0000 and ask for the sales department. The first available rep will be glad to assist

On 2011-06-10 2:00 PM, Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info> wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> It's not clear to me... are ALL autoresponders "braindead" or are there >> some that don't notice it's a mailing list contacting them? > Some auto-responders look at the to: field and if it's not directly sent > to the recipient's address (i.e.

Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail. Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw. beantworten. In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden. Er hat die email-Adresse hans.lamotte@umbreit-kg.de und ist telefonisch unter 07142/596-152 zu erreichen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Müller G. Umbreit GmbH & Co.KG

Please be aware that John Lambert is no longer with Smarts. If this is business related, please contact Jonathan Perkins, at jonathan.perkins@smarts.com or by phone at 650.619.2052.

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

If you must use an out-of-office feature in your email, please exclude any mailing lists you're subscribed to. I deleted the message that I was forwarding in this, but I'm sure we all know what I'm talking about. Tim Conway Unix System Administration Contractor - IBM Global Services desk:3032734776 conway@us.ibm.com

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, Jim Klimov wrote: > I agree with you. Probably similar could be done with stunnel, to avoid > maintaining in NUT a fast moving target of modern cryptography. And indeed it > may be better in terms of switching real deployments to new protocols if old > ones are deemed insecure, with implementations made by people hopefully better > knowledgeable about the

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my

Hello Marco, On 7/27/07, Marco Mouta <marco.mouta at gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > The VoiceMail<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+voicemail2>application uses > */usr/sbin/sendmail* to mail voicemail messages to users. This can be any > sendmail-compatible MTA. In practice you can use Sendmail<http://sendmail.org/>, > Postfix

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

Hi guys, I don't know if this is the question ... But I have my softphones set up to use ilbc (because I found that it is better for me) and I'm trying to connect them to my provider that provides me termination through g.729. I don't have any T1 or whatever card in my server. But everytime I try to connect them they use gsm ... I don't know why ... So, that's the reason of my

Hello Marco, On 7/27/07, Marco Mouta <marco.mouta at gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > The VoiceMail<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+voicemail2>application uses > */usr/sbin/sendmail* to mail voicemail messages to users. This can be any > sendmail-compatible MTA. In practice you can use Sendmail<http://sendmail.org/>, > Postfix

On 2007 Jul 26 (Thu) at 09:32:00 -0400 (-0400), Jared Smith wrote: :On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:06 -0700, Peter Hessler wrote: :> ;; dialtone in the background isn't there any more :> ;; dialed '305' :> ;; everything from here is exactly as expected. : :OK, I missed this in the first email you sent... Asterisk is playing :dialtone *on top* of the background message the first

Hi! Thank you all for the info! But I think I haven't explained my scenario well enough. I am not relaying the calls to SIP. What happens is the following (the scenario is: a call started from an ISDN E1 PBX, through the asterisk, to the PSTN, and was answered by the remote party): 1. A CONNECT comes from the PSTN containing a Display IE (which has info sent by the telco that is used for