similar to: Problems with --exclude

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:32:04PM -0700, Michael Rubel wrote: > Hi J.W., > > Please pardon this intrusion on your private address; the rsync list seems > to be down (no messages since yesterday), so I'm forwarding this directly > to you. If you'd rather wait until the list restarts, that's fine too. I'm CCing the list. > > Best regards, > Mike >

I am using R-1.9.1 with windows 2000 and trying to build a package. However, when I issue the command: RCMD build --binary BSDA I get: >>> Building/Updating help pages for package 'BSDA' Formats: chm hhc: not found cp: cannot stat `C:/R191/R191/JUNK/BSDA/chm/BSDA.chm': No such file or direc tory make[1]: *** [chm-BSDA] Error 1 make: *** [pkg-BSDA] Error 2 ***

I have a peculiar problem that I'm sure is a simple one, but I can't figure out what my mistake is. Can someone enlighten me? I have a simple file, class.R: ## setClass("abc",representation(a = "character", b = "ANY")) I have a package directory ExpressCGH1 made with package.skeleton. The package happily builds and installs, but R CMD check fails with

Hi people, im new on the list. I have a samba 3.0.10 working as a PDC with roaming profiles for win2003 clients. The problem is that the windows 2003 uses a lot of desktop.ini "hiden files" that when i save this on my roaming profile and i log back in for the second time i lost this "hiden bit" on the desktop.ini files and i see them everywhere. Even on the

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:23:43 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Rowland, > > > Even that msNPAllowDialin is a standard attribute, its not in my AD > anymore, at least not within the users fields. I think in time this > disapert wil fixing things.. This setup is running and upgraded as of > samba 4.1. but thank for

Dr. Tweedie, et al.: I have decided to move to EXT3 from ReiserFS if I can get tail packing for EXT3. Last I had asked about it, someone had written some sort of patch but it was not official (I think), and was questionable if it had worked or not. Can someone tell me the status in the instant? If I installed 2.4.18 or a later kernel, would tail packing be part of EXT3? How would I turn it on or

Hi, I'm trying to figure out which process is rotating my maillog every Sunday at 4:03 am. This happens on all of my centos 4 boxes. AFAICT, logrotate is not running. This is from a fairly minimal install, so I'm assuming this is a default process. --- [root at penguin ~]# ls -l /var/log/maill* -rw------- 1 root root 230603836 Sep 27 16:30 /var/log/maillog -rw------- 1 root

Hi all, Here is a RRD graph ive just made of my packet shaping setup: http://www.overclockers.com.au/~mwp/temp/tc-1hour.png The app creating the P-25 traffic is bittorrent on the Linux box also doing the shaping. P-22 and P-23 is created by FTP transfers. Starts with bittorrent running. At 00:03, an FTP transfer is started on "cool.comp" (windows box). At 00:09, bittorrent is

Hello, Could someone please tell me how to configure for this case. After going through all types of documentation, I think my case is either too simple or impossible that's why it's nowhere mentioned. I would appreciate very much if someone could point me to the right direction. I have two laptops one running Linux and is a Samba server. One is running

Hai All, is there any way to make one case for file naming in sama share upper case or lower case but we need to set only ONE case for our volume.. also how i can restrict users from using space in file name If any way please guide; THANK YOU IN ADVANCE Jerrynikky.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4764 Summary: Wrong include/exclude descriptions Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: tps@vr-web.de QAContact:

Hi, I''m having a weird validation issue. Validation isn''t working for certain attributes and, for some reason, it''s also affecting things outside of validation. For campers on certain camp types, we require some information about their school. I tried to validate the information this way: validates_presence_of :school_type, :if => Proc.new { |c| !c.booking.nil?

Hello, I am building a R-package for Genetics analysis. The accepted data is in pedigree (.ped) file format. To load the data (say CAMP.ped) from "data" directory, I have a function "CAMP.R", which does the job. The package builds successfully in Linux (.tar.gz) and the data loads successfully by "data(CAMP)". However, when I build the package in WINDOWS, the data

In this real example (below), all four of the replicates in one treatment combination had zero failures, and this produced a very high standard error in the summary.lm. =20 Just adding one failure to one of the replicates produced a well-behaved standard error. =20 I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly hard for users to understand. =20 I would value your comments=20 =20 Thanks =20

On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Proposal > Re-architect the linker based on the section model where it’s appropriate. > Stop simulating different linker semantics using the Unix model. Instead, directly implement the native behavior. Preface: I have never personally contributed code to LLD, so don’t take anything I’m about to say too seriously.

Hi, A potential customer would like to be able to do this: If a call comes in for an employee who is on the phone, allow the front-desk to push the caller in a queue directly to the employee. Now, this is easily done by using queues, but I am curious: What is the performance impact on a system if _every_ employee (phone) has their own queue. How scalable is that in comparison to

It seems that there are a few camps here: * The scp power users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick notation is fine and that running arbitrary commands is a perfectly fine thing to do. * The restricted shell users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick may not be the best, and there are various restricted shells which can prevent this. Power users may belong to this

I'm sorry if my suggestion gave an impression that I disregard the Mach-O port of the LLD linker. I do care about Mach-O. I do not plan to break or remove any functionality from the current Mach-O port of the LLD. I don't propose to remove the atom model from the linker as long as it seems to be a good fit for the port (and looks like it is). As to the proposal to have two different

Dear R users, I am putting together reading and resources lists for spatial statistics and spatial econometrics and am looking for some pointers from more experienced practitioners. In particular, I find two "camps" in spatial modelling, and am wondering which approach is better suitied to which situation. The first camp is along the lines of Venables and Ripley's Chapter 14

Hi guys, After working for a long period of time on LLD, I think I found a few things that we should improve in the LLD design for both development ease and runtime performance. I would like to get feedback on this proposal. Thanks! *Problems with the current LLD architecture *The current LLD architecture has, in my opinion, two issues. *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures