similar to: rsync -vt shows directories considered?

Hi, Basically, I want to preserve some of directories on destination side conditionally and hence, I choose to use --filter option mentioned in rsync man pages. I noticed that --filter option works as expected when I don't have --relative option used but in below case it doesn't work. rsync -avz --relative --delete --filter='H /mydir2' --exclude='- /preserve' mydir1/.

Hi, I was in under impression that rsync 3.0.5/3.0.6 creates all the missing directories in the path but I think I am wrong. Could any one tell me is it possible to create all missing dirs in path at destination side if not exists. Currently, I have been getting below errors. rsync -avz /tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ desthost:/tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ sending

Hi, I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. Source Dest ---------- --------- /foo/bar/ /foo/bar/ | -> baz | -> baz | -> xyz | -> xyz | ->

Hello everyone,   any ideas on why a newly installed domain member (w2k8 domain) might seem to work fine in every test (wbinfo -g, wbinfo -t, getent group, wbinfo -n username, getent passwd user, share-access.., ) but only enumeration of users with wbinfo -u and getent passwd fail? wbinfo -u just returns without any output and getent passwd just shows the default centos7 users.   Even with

Hi all, I'm stuck with a little dilemma and I thought someone could give me a little advice. Is there a way to use rsync with an ssh certificate? what I have: ---------------- First of all I am forced to use the root account with ssh which I know is a big no, no, but sometimes it can't be helped. Second, I need to use a certificate without a password as root which is even worst than

I've seen error messages about this since we installed 1.9.18p10 of samba, so I went looking in the code for the context. Here (from password.c) is the context: /* * Attempt a session setup with a totally incorrect password. * If this succeeds with the guest bit *NOT* set then the password * server is broken and is not correctly setting the guest bit. We

Hi, I'm experimenting with the migration function of virsh. I'm doing the migrate with following commands: virsh migrate --life --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose --abort-on-error domain qemu+ssh://root@destination/system virsh migrate-setmaxdowntime domain 20000 However sometimes at the end of the migration, the guest isn't started on the destination host. So I'm left

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Dominique Ramaekers wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experimenting with the migration function of virsh. I'm doing the > migrate with following commands: > > virsh migrate --life --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose > --abort-on-error domain qemu+ssh://root@destination/system virsh > migrate-setmaxdowntime domain 20000 > >

Jonathan wrote: | have upgraded SAMBA 2.04 to 2.06 and server versions 2.6 to 2.7 Solaris. | After reloading SAMBA I get an internal error in my logs and users an not | connect even though it shows up in the network. Below is the error in the | log ... That's a failure in --- BOOL attempt_netbios_session_request(struct cli_state *cli, char *srchost, char *desthost, struct in_addr *pdest_ip) {

Peter: Thanks! It now works fine on Solaris 2.6. Now I just need to remember how to manipulate source RPMs so I can fix the Linux (RedHat 6.x) version. :-) pete > From peter@cadcamlab.org Sun Jul 16 16:41:17 2000 > Cc: <samba@samba.org> > Subject: [PATCH] `smbclient -M' ignores `-p port' > > [Pete Peterson <petersonp@genrad.com>] > > It appears

I posted this problem as a question to this list a while ago and got no reply. I submitted it as a bug, but found that "samba-bugs@samba.org", no longer accepts bug reports, even though the web page says to send them to that address. Wondering if the option had been intentionally discontinuted without updating the man page, I made a quick check of the source and found that the "-p

Hello, I use rsync v3.0.7 with "--delete-during", but it appears to act more like "--delete-before". I've checked the docs and list archives, but I am still discovering some of the subtleties of rsync, and I can't see where I'm going wrong. There's an example of my issue below... can anybody set me straight? =-) o We archive a small number of large files,

> I have just upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 and can no longer connect to Samba > shares on my FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE machine. When I attempt to connect, the > smb.log contains the following information: > > [2000/01/04 17:54:42, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(566) > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name > NTWEB2.AIS.MSU.EDU<0x20> > [2000/01/04

I recently upgraded to 18p8 from 16p11 and found that smbclient now needed a -W in order to connect properly to our domain (which was not the name supplied with the -DWORKGROUP= from the make). Turns out that clientutil.c always uses the value specified by the WORKGROUP macro and never calls lp_workgroup() to get the value specified in the smb.conf file, unless WORKGROUP is "".

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Brent Jones<brent at servuhome.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, James Lever<j at jamver.id.au> wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2009, at 4:38 PM, John Ryan wrote: >> >>> Can I ask the same question - does anyone know when the 113 build will >>> show up on pkg.opensolaris.org/dev ? >> >> On

> I have the following in my smb.conf for NT servers (3.51 and 4.0): > > security = server > password server = %m > > This works fine for 1.9.17p3 and earlier, but doesn't work with 1.9.17p4, > 1.9.17p5, or 1.9.18alpha14. > > Here is the error I'm getting: > > NetwkstaUserLogon gave error 59 > password server BUD failed NetWkstaUserLogon > >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8829 Summary: rsync -uav --delete --dry-run prints delete file list in reverse order Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same

Patch against samba 3.0.0 client/client.c Mainly for -L parameter options 1.) Add a configurable connection delay. The default is too long. Add items to long_options of poptOption for help message, however I just put something "i.e. CONNSETUP" to the last parameter of long_options. It seems for use of documentation ???? 2.) Remark the code that require list_servers must using port

Hi all, I had linux samba 3.0.10 running as PDC of my domain which does only authentication for other linux samba boxes which are providing access to shares. After upgrade of PDC to Debian Lenny + samba 3.2.5 I've lost guess access to the shares which are run by samba 3.0.x boxes, while it works on samba 3.2.5 samba box. the scheme is like following :