similar to: "touch" option for -c ?

Hello, i have two clients (c1 and c2) with 100% same hard- and software and also two servers (s1 and s2) with 100% same hard- and software. The servers run "rsync --daemon", the clients start rsync periodically to syncronize a directory with them, where c1 syncs with s1 and c2 with s2. The directories are the same on s1 and s2! Paradoxically the CPU Usage of the rsync process on c1

----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 2:03:44 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Syncronize systemctl status with reality? On 29 Aug 2017 17:58, "Leroy Tennison" <leroy at datavoiceint.com> wrote: The particular issue is with puppetmaster (which

Dovecot 1.0.3 Deliver is saying this on two specific emails. Other emails to these 2 users are going through fine. Looking at the mail headers the only thing questionable I see is: From: "AMS Publication Division"@ams.org Is this the problem? # 1.0.3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ protocols: imap pop3 listen(default): *:143 listen(imap): *:143 listen(pop3):

I am looking at possibility of using OCFS2 with an existing application that requires very high throughput for read and write file access. Files are created by single writer (process) and can be read by multiple reader, possibly while the file is being written. 100+ different files may be written simultaneously, and can be read by 1000+ readers. I am currently using XFS on a local filesystem,

part of extensions.conf: exten => 11,1,Answer() exten => 11,n,NoOp(CallerID : ${CALLERID(all)}) exten => 11,n,Playback(/tmp/welkom-tcs.alaw) exten => 11,n,GoToIfTime(09:00-17:59|mon-fri|*|*?open,s,1) ; wordt doorgerouteerd naar context open, maar indien gesloten : exten => 11,n,NoOp(Oproep tijdens winkel gesloten) exten => 11,n,Playback(/tmp/winkel-gesloten.alaw) exten =>

FWIW, I looked at the settings in our domain (all of which I did myself). I used to explicitly set up ntp time sources in our network for all windows workstations before, and I continued to provide these after conversion from nt4-style domain to samba AD-DC. The NTP records are provided by DHCP, and are configured in the GPO, both with regional differences (choosing the local NTP servers within

i have several large .tar backup file on the server it's about 2 GB and 4 GB the question is, if i syncronize using rsync to other computer, rsync will re-transfer the whole 1 big file, or only transfer part of the file ? or maybe i should reduce the size, by splitting the file into 650 Mb each. or it's the same as if transfering via FTP ? thanks Luqman.H ---------------------

I have repeatable cases where a (very large) file contents are the intended content of a device (partition) of that exact size. The target device is already mostly of that content, but a few block have been changed. I want to restore the device contents back to what the file originally was. I'm trying to find a way to have rsync's write end open the device as a file and do its thing to

Hi. My goal is to use rsync to syncronize box1 and box2. On box2, I have a tapedrive which I write the data I syncronize from box1 every night. On box1, my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like this: root@box1# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf max connections = 1 syslog facility = local6 [tmp] path = /tmp read only = yes comment = export of /tmp hosts allow = box2 auth users

Hi everybody, I have been using rsync for quite some time, and I've realized it is a fantastic tool. As it is able to syncronize two CD images, I was wondering, if I could do that with a harddisk partition. Would it be possible to syncronize two partitions at device level somehow? I mean using: # rsync /dev/hda8 /dev/hda9 skipping non-regular file "hda8" where /dev/hda8

I've almost got this thing working. I have it set up on a centos machine to authenticate logins and automounts to windows file servers. But it won't allow me to specify a domain as part of the userid. I can set a default domain in smb.conf and logging into that domain works like a champ. And I can list the other domains with "wbinfo --online-status" (not sure what

I am new to SAMBA and I have what I'm not even sure is an issue. I am aware of the difference in time stamps between *nix and Windows. What I don't understand is this: I used touch to modify the time stamps of a large number of files on the file server from the server side to match the time in the file name. They were video files from my Digital Video Cam and the import program used

Hi, I use rsync to syncronize two systems. There are 2 million + files. My problem is 1. rsync is very slow (it needs more than 48 hours) 2. rsync needs too much RAM (ca. 750 MByte on each server) The backup software needs 14 hours including file transfer to the backup server for full backup. My configuration: 1. Server Dual-XEON with 2 GB RAM. 2. Server Dual-PIII with 2 GB RAM. The partition

Under wine versions .19 and .20 (only 2 I've tried), I get sticking keys resulting in uncontrollable spinning (or running or whatever key gets stuck. The log output has a bunch (100+) fixmes relating to keyboard (see code). Thanks for any help! Code: fixme:keyboard:X11DRV_MapVirtualKeyEx keyboard layout (nil) is not supported fixme:keyboard:X11DRV_LoadKeyboardLayout L"00000409",

Hello, i'm using postfix like smtp server, i need to choose an imap server with a special features. I have a customer with 3 different geographic locations. Every locations have a mail server for the same domain (example.com). If user1 at example.com receive mail form external this mail going on every locations server. I've a problem now, is it possible to syncronize the state (mail

I have Time precision problem between linux samba shares and M$ files I want to use my tux to save files from my M$ PC's. Of course I want to do incrementals copy based on modification date... I mount my samba shares from my Windows Boxs and use tools on the micro$oft boxs. (Xcopy /D or SyncroniX ) The problem is that the modification date on the samba share and on de source file on the M$

On Mar 2, 2013 3:18 AM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > > Does LLVM try and make sure that all memory is freed before compiler exit? > > For example, It seems like the ARM constant pool code that I'm reading will leave a lot of un-deallocated memory. > > Maybe I'm missing something here. Is it that necessary to have the compiler free

Dear Group, I'm using samba 3.x as a PDC, and I'm using linux system quota v2 for samba. Here is my problem: if a user copies a big file to the desktop (bigger than the quota set for that user), when he logs off, the profile wont syncronize with the server with the message "disk full". Is there a way to let the WinXp client to understand how much space is available also for

I do a bunch of "kindness of strangers" hosting in my basement and my three kVA apc unit died recently. In looking around, it looked like Belkin was a reasonable low-end replacement for a few machines. Then I read this mailing list after I purchased one and was gifted another. It looks like people don't like Belkin. ;-) So the question is what's a good UPS for running

On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 02:14:22AM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:29:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > These ones? > > > >