Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Possible security hole"
2003 Mar 30
1
[RFC][patch] dynamic rolling block and sum sizes II
Mark II of the patch set.
The first patch (dynsumlen2.patch) increments the protocol
version to support per-file dynamic block checksum sizes.
It is a prerequisite for varsumlen2.patch.
varsumlen2.patch implements per-file dynamic block and checksum
sizes.
The current block size calculation only applies to files
between 7MB and 160MB setting the block size to 1/10,0000 of
the file length for a
2002 Aug 05
5
[patch] read-devices
Greetings,
I'd like to propose a new option to rsync, which causes it to read
device files as if they were regular files. This includes pipes,
character devices and block devices (I'm not sure about sockets). The
main motivation is cases where you need to synchronize a large amount of
data that is not available as regular files, as in the following scenarios:
* Keep a copy of a block
2003 Sep 14
2
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(463)
Hi,
I'm having a problem rsyncing one file (since I signed it). It seems that
the content of a file is able to cause problems in the protocol.
building file list ...
28820 files to consider
apt/packages/avifile/
apt/packages/avifile/avifile-0.7.34-1.dag.rh90.i386.rpm
rsync: error writing 4 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code
2002 Mar 23
1
why variable last_i is needed in match.c rsync source ?
Hi all
I see the rsync source and rsync makes hashing table and search hashing
table tag_table to find the index of array struct sum_buf , which is a
element of struct sum_struct.
According to the source code, variable last_i is used to encourage
adjacent matches allowing the RLL coding of the output to work more
efficiently.
Why last_i makes more efficiency?
I can't understanding what
2003 Mar 22
2
[RFC] protocol version
I'm in the midst of coding a patch set for consideration
that will bump the protocol version and have a couple of
observations.
The current minimum backwards-compatible protocol is 15
but we have code that checks for protocol versions as old as
12. If someone else doesn't beat me to it i'm considering
cleaning out the pre-15 compatibility code. A backwards
compatibility patch could
2004 Jul 16
6
[Bug 1529] 32bit rollover problem rsyncing files greater than 4GB in size
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-07-14 09:55
2003 Mar 23
1
[RFC] dynamic checksum size
Currently rsync has a bit of a problem with very large
files. Dynamic block sizes were introduced to try handle that
automatically if the user didn't specify a block size.
Unfortunately that isn't enough and the block size would
need to grow faster than the file. Besides, overly large block
sizes mean large amounts of data need to be copied even for
small changes.
The maths indicate
2004 Dec 27
7
[Bug 2187] rsync large file getting verification failed using -z
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2187
------- Additional Comments From qiucheng@csc.com.cn 2004-12-27 01:15 -------
Created an attachment (id=869)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=869&action=view)
error log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact
2003 Sep 30
2
problem with batch mode:
Hi!
I try to use batch mode to send only the difference between two packed CDs
by email over a slow line.
I create the diff with:
rsync -avvv --write-batch=rs CD-ROM-V6.6.32.zip CD-ROM-V6.6.31.zip
where
alfred:/Auslieferung/CD # l -n
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 453248121 Sep 2 16:22 CD-ROM-V6.6.31.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 407416499 Sep 29 13:39 CD-ROM-V6.6.32.zip
resulting
2004 Jun 19
1
[Bug 1467] Hash table generation seems to be flawed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1467
------- Additional Comments From ripper@internode.on.net 2004-06-19 02:18 -------
The way the code seems to work is as follows:
A sorted list of hashes and their block numbers are generated (targets).
They're sorted so that identical hashes are numerically next to each other.
A reverse lookup table is then generated, that (i presume) is
2007 Sep 01
2
Comparing "transform" to "with"
Hi All,
I've been successfully using the with function for analyses and the
transform function for multiple transformations. Then I thought, why not
use "with" for both? I ran into problems & couldn't figure them out from
help files or books. So I created a simplified version of what I'm
doing:
rm( list=ls() )
x1<-c(1,3,3)
x2<-c(3,2,1)
x3<-c(2,5,2)
2008 Apr 22
4
how to convert non numeric data into numeric?
I am having the following error in my function
function(theta,reqdIRR)
{
theta1<-theta[1]
theta2<-theta[2]
n<-length(reqdIRR)
constant<- n*(theta1+theta2)
sum1<-lapply(reqdIRR*exp(theta1),FUN = sum)
sum2<-lapply(exp(theta2 - reqdIRR*exp(theta1)),FUN = sum)
sum = sum1 + sum2
log.fcn = constant - as.numeric(sum)
result = - log.fcn
return(result)
}
*error :
2018 Jul 10
9
[PATCH 0/7] PowerPC64 performance improvements
The following series adds initial vector support for PowerPC64.
On POWER9, flac --best is about 3.3x faster.
Amitay Isaacs (2):
Add m4 macro to check for C __attribute__ features
Check if compiler supports target attribute on ppc64
Anton Blanchard (5):
configure.ac: Remove SPE detection code
configure.ac: Add VSX enable/disable
configure.ac: Fix FLAC__CPU_PPC on little endian, and add
2007 Feb 01
3
Help with efficient double sum of max (X_i, Y_i) (X & Y vectors)
Greetings.
For R gurus this may be a no brainer, but I could not find pointers to
efficient computation of this beast in past help files.
Background - I wish to implement a Cramer-von Mises type test statistic
which involves double sums of max(X_i,Y_j) where X and Y are vectors of
differing length.
I am currently using ifelse pointwise in a vector, but have a nagging
suspicion that there is a
2007 Apr 03
1
Speex ARM4 patch
The attached patch eliminates some warnings while compiling for ARM4
targets. It also simplifies the asm constraints a bit. Now we can use
the ARM4 optimisations when compiling for PortalPlayer targets in Rockbox.
Cheers,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: speex_arm4.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1550 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
2013 Mar 25
2
Faster way of summing values up based on expand.grid
Hello!
# I have 3 vectors of values:
values1<-rnorm(10)
values2<-rnorm(10)
values3<-rnorm(10)
# In real life, all 3 vectors have a length of 25
# I create all possible combinations of 4 based on 10 elements:
mycombos<-expand.grid(1:10,1:10,1:10,1:10)
dim(mycombos)
# Removing rows that contain pairs of identical values in any 2 of
these columns:
mycombos<-mycombos[!(mycombos$Var1
2003 Dec 20
3
preview release: 2.6.0pre1
OK, I packaged up the current CVS as our first preview release for
2.6.0. You can grab it here:
http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre1.tar.gz
The MD5 checksum is:
70e9dea967f083c231b7821ef35aef1b rsync-2.6.0pre1.tar.gz
There is not currently a .sig file for the package, but I'm looking into
that next.
Please test this and let me know if we have any remaining issues
2008 Nov 26
1
SSE2 code won't compile in VC
Jean-Marc,
At least VS2005 (what I'm using) won't compile resample_sse.h with
_USE_SSE2 defined because it refuses to cast __m128 to __m128d and vice
versa. While there are intrinsics to do the casts, I thought it would be
simpler to just use an intrinsic that accomplishes the same thing
without all the casting. Thanks,
--John
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline double
2008 Apr 04
1
Resampler experimental speedups
Hello :)
The attached patch (which is not in any way finished) optimizes the
resampler. (For those following the discussions on IRC; this version
includes optimizations for both direct and interpolate cases).
Using GCC 4.3, x86_64, Valgrind to measure instruction counts,
resampling 10 frames of 320 floats at quality 3. Direct was measured
with a 16=>48 resampling, and interpolate with a
2020 May 18
6
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
This drop-in patch increases the performance of the get_checksum1()
function on x86-64.
On the target slow CPU performance of the function increased by nearly
50% in the x86-64 default SSE2 mode, and by nearly 100% if the
compiler was told to enable SSSE3 support. The increase was over 200%
on the fastest CPU tested in SSSE3 mode.
Transfer time improvement with large files existing on both ends