similar to: doing an md5sum rsync?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "doing an md5sum rsync?"

2001 Sep 20
2
win32:DEVICE_Open Unknown VxD A:. Try --winver nt40 or win31 !
Hi, I was hoping to use wine to run one of those stupid windows binaries that generate a floppy (at least IBM has a clue, and also offers the raw floppy image for dd-ing) In this case, the culprit is seagate's seatools: http://www.seagate.com/support/seatools/ I installed wine under debian unstable (Version: 0.0.20010824-1) and when I run the windows binary under wine, it runs but
2013 Oct 17
1
btrfs-zero-log (v 0.20-rc1) corrupted double linked list.
I asked the debian maintainer to add btrfs-zero-log to the initramfs since I unfortunately have to use it from time to time. It still fixes the problem for me when btrfs won''t mount, but it errors at the end. See screenshot Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems ....
2013 Mar 27
4
zlib vs lzo uncompress speed, ssd vs nossd
I just setup a new SSD with my laptop root filesystem, and at the time I though, "eh, I''ll just use zlib compression during the first copy, and then switch to lzo afterwards to maintain write speed when I''m using the laptop after the copy and reboot". Now, I rebooted with the new ssd and zlib compressed rootfs, and it seemed to boot slower than it did before with the
2012 Jul 04
2
3.4.4: BUG: Bad rss-counter state x
Since I heard absolutely nothing on my last but and corruption report, I''m not sure if they are useful or wanted (please let me know). The last thing I''ve seen with 3.4.4 is this: kernel: [116130.309667] btrfs: unlinked 25 orphans kernel: [117951.440823] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff8801e2a4c080 idx:1 val:-1 kernel: [117951.440832] BUG: Bad rss-counter state
2013 Feb 25
4
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf()
Is this useful to anyone? Got this after a crash/reboot: if (block_rsv) { WARN_ON(block_rsv->size > 0); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< btrfs_free_block_rsv(root, block_rsv); } ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xcb/0xdf() Hardware name: 2429A78 Modules linked in:
2010 Jun 16
1
change of behaviour on rsync -R and top level symlinks?
Here is what my data looks like: source:~# ls -ld /data /data/etc2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-03 23:32 /data -> /export/hda3 -rw-r--r-- 1 produser prod 4 2010-06-15 17:30 /data/etc2 destination:/# ls -l /data lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2010-06-15 18:36 /data -> /export/hda3 Let's start with an ancient rsync: source:~# rsync-broken --version rsync version 2.4.6 protocol
2013 Jan 08
10
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3707 still not fixed in 3.7.1 (btrfs-zero-log required) but shown as "RIP btrfs_num_copies"
Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time to time, and too often it triggers this bug in btrfs which is quite hard to recover from. The bigger problem is that all the user sees (if anything) is seemingly unrelated info, namely, "RIP: btrfs_num_copies+0x42/0x0b" or somesuch http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs_num_copies.jpg It''s only if you have serial console, or netconsole,
2013 Feb 08
12
Fwd: Current State of BTRFS
Hi everybody, I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can''t qualify the circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system freezes for some time. Maybe somebody could suggest some general things I could try to search for the problem? Thanks in advance, Florian --- Some background information: $ mount |
2012 Apr 01
19
cross-subvolume cp --reflink
Glück Auf! I know its been discussed more then ones, but as a user I really would like to see the patch for allowing this in the kernel. Some users tested this patch successfully for weeks or months in 2 or 3 kernel versions since then, true? I''d say by creating a snapshot, it''s nothing else in the end. More then one file or tree sharing the same data on disc, or am I wrong?
2013 Mar 16
6
multiple btrfsck runs
Is it expected that running btrfsck more than once will keep reporting errors? Below is the end of a btrfsck output when run the second time. backpointer mismatch on [111942471680 32768] owner ref check failed [111942471680 32768] ref mismatch on [111942504448 40960] extent item 1, found 0 Incorrect local backref count on 111942504448 root 5 owner 160739 offset 3440640 found 0 wanted 1 back
2023 May 05
1
6.2 still cannot get hdmi display out on Thinkpad P73 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile/TU104
On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:32:16 -0700 Marc MERLIN <marc_nouveau at merlins.org> wrote: > Hi again, I just saw a bunch of commits from all of you (thanks), but > still can't find info if my thinkpad P73 with Quadro RTX 4000 > Mobile/TU104 is meant to be supported, or not, and if so, how I can > best report issues beyond what I've already sent. > > The intel graphics
2020 May 29
3
5.5 kernel: using nouveau or something else just long enough to turn off Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile for hybrid graphics?
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > moving to new window moves the mouse, but not windows get displayed. > > Do you see anything in dmesg after this is set up? I'd expect some > errors about timeouts or something else. Nothing other than what I pasted. > Which kernel are you using? There have been some turing-specific fixes recently. 5.5.11.
2012 Jul 31
4
BTRFS crash on mount with 3.4.4
My kernel crashed for some other reason, and now I can''t mount my btrfs filesystem. I don''t care about the data, it''s backed up. I''ll compile a 3.5 kernel, but is there any info you''d like off that filesystem to see why btrfs is crashing on mount? Marc [ 313.152857] device label btrfs_pool1 devid 1 transid 20769 /dev/mapper/disk1 [ 313.171318]
2010 Apr 23
1
uninstalling and installing on linux
Hi List, I have a question about uninstalling and installing R on linux, which I am new to. > sessionInfo() R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C [9] LC_ADDRESS=C
2020 Sep 08
2
pcieport 0000:00:01.0: PME: Spurious native interrupt (nvidia with nouveau and thunderbolt on thinkpad P73)
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:51:19AM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > oh, I somehow missed that "disp ctor failed" message. I think that > might explain why things are a bit hanging. From the top of my head I > am not sure if that's something known or something new. But just in > case I CCed Lyude and Ben. And I think booting with > nouveau.debug=disp=trace could already
2006 May 09
4
Upgrade from 2.3.1 to 2.6.6 fail
Hi all, I upgrade my rsync from 2.3.1 to 2.6.6 today in the client host, everything seems not working after the migration. I didn't touch the rsync server. Herewith is the log from my rsync server. I looks like something related to IPV6, anyone has any idea? Rsync Server : RHEL4 with rsync 2.6.3 deamon running Rsync Client (merlin) : Solaris 8 with rsync 2.6.6 2006/05/09 16:18:40 [5332]
2012 Dec 06
0
Summary command: Two independent variables against dependent.
Brilliant, thanks very much!! Works fine. Dan On 6 Dec 2012, at 18:25, arun kirshna [via R] wrote: > Hi, > Your question is not very clear. I hope you are not looking for the subset option in summary(lm()). > If you want just the summary(), then use '&' or '|' > For e.g. > dat1<-read.table(text=" > opcorn Oilamt Batch Yield >
2004 Aug 22
3
asterisk T100P to Merlin Legend
Management just approved purchase of a Digium T100P and a T1 card for our Merlin Legend Switch. I will appreciate comments from anyone performing this installation before: - Which T1 card did you use in the Merlin Legend? - Did you require any special interface? (CSU/DSU, etc) - Any items to watch during installation. Also we will need to remove one of our old analog Trunk cards to accomodate
2017 Mar 08
4
Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > > information on this matter, and have found information that is > anywhere from > > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more > up to
2004 Feb 19
1
Problem with CIFS on Linux-2.4.22
Hi there, I'm resending this to the list as I didn't get an answer from sfrench.. > I hope I'm right here. I just followed the "Ask the developer" link on > the CIFS homepage... > > I have to mount a little share from a Windows server, which I did with > smbmount in the past. Now the server has been upgraded to Win2003, and > I'm facing the