similar to: new option suggestion '--backup-only'

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "new option suggestion '--backup-only'"

2004 Apr 15
0
Multiple compare-dest args
Hi all. I have just finished a small patch that adds support for multiple --compare-dest or --link-dest args. Its primary usage is to do incremental backups on top of eachother. (My current backup system stores each incremental as a single diff of the latest full.) Example: First full backup: rsync -a somedir full-20040415/ First incremental: rsync -a --compare-dest=../full-20040415 \
2004 Oct 05
0
new option implemented: --delete-mdays
Hi folks, we would like your feedback on a new option we have implemented. We would like to know whether it should be merged into the CVS tree. Perhaps one of the rsync developers can have a look at the code, improve it where necessary, and committ it to CVS. The name of the option is "--delete-mdays=DAYS" and it works in conjunction with the option "--delete." It modifies
2007 Apr 03
0
Modifications to NOT recursively make_backup
Hi: Suppose I have the following files on my target volume: /Applications/[45,000 sub files and directories] /Developer/[120,000 sub files and directories] ... (another 8 or so directories with lots of files and sub directories) /usr/ [75,000 sub files and directories] For a total of approximately 500K files and directories. On my source, I have only a handful of items: /Data/ [70 items]
2002 Aug 02
1
[patch] --link-dest
Updated to current cvs without the --exclude-from - patch. This patch allows specifying a --link-dest path similar to --compare-dest except that unchanged files are hard-linked to the --link-dest path instead of producing a sparse tree. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember
2002 Mar 22
1
[PATCH] --link-dest option
Please CC me. I'm not subscribed. Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the --link-dest option so rsync will create hardlinks for unchanged regular files to a directory on the destination. This is like --compare-dest except that the result is not a sparse tree. Also included is extension to --(ex|in)clude-from to allow - for stdin. Could one of the maintainers please add
2010 Jul 09
8
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7565] New: --check-point=<TIME> +options.c.patch +generator.c.patch
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7565 Summary: --check-point=<TIME> +options.c.patch +generator.c.patch Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2003 Oct 18
0
Added functionality --compare-file and --compare-auto
Recently various needs for multiple version handling were discussed and I put forward a plan of mine. Subsequently the proposal for a --compare-file=<FILE> switch had support, so I have implemented this. I have also implemented an experimental --compare-auto which decides which file to match against using a rule. Instructions for patch: 1. Install rsync-2.5.6 source 2. "patch -p1
2004 Feb 16
1
[patch] Add `--link-by-hash' option (rev 2).
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 2) * This revision is actually against CVS HEAD (I didn't realize I was working from a stale rsync'd CVS). * Apply permissions after
2005 Jan 05
1
rsync filename heuristics
On 5 Jan 2005, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:24 +0100, Robert Lemmen wrote: > > hi rusty, > > > > i read on some webpage about rsync and debian that you wrote a patch to > > rsync that let's it uses heuristics when deciding which local file to > > use. could you tell me whether this is planned to be included in
2004 Feb 17
1
[patch] Make robust_rename() handle EXDEV.
All callers of robust_rename() call copy_file() if EXDEV is received. This patch moves the copy_file() call into robust_rename(). Patch Summary: -12 +1 backup.c -15 +2 rsync.c -9 +33 util.c -------------- next part -------------- patchwork diff util.c --- util.c 2004-02-17 09:58:44.000000000 -0500 +++ util.c 2004-02-17 10:21:22.000000000 -0500 @@ -355,16 +355,40 @@
2004 Feb 23
0
[patch] Add `--link-by-hash' option (rev 4).
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 4) * Updated for committed robust_rename() patch, other changes in CVS. (rev 3) * Don't link empty files. * Roll over to new file when
2004 Feb 17
0
[patch] Add `--link-by-hash' option (rev 3).
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 3) * Don't link empty files. * Roll over to new file when filesystem maximum link count is reached. * If link fails for another reason, leave
2004 Feb 23
0
[patch] Add `--link-by-hash' option (rev 5).
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 5) * Fixed silly logic error. (rev 4) * Updated for committed robust_rename() patch, other changes in CVS. (rev 3) * Don't link empty
2005 Jan 31
1
[patch] add "--ignore" option
Hi, The patch below adds a "--ignore" option to rsync, which means "--exclude-but-dont-delete-even-if-we-specified--delete-excluded". I need this for a few tasks, the simplest of which is to have rsync resist trying to delete NetApp filers' ".snapshot" directories. The change is fairly simple (the boolean filter returns become tri-state), and works for me both
2015 Jan 23
0
rsync 3.1.1 wrong transfer of app packages using --backup
Dear All, I found a workaround for the corrupted backup app package files though there is probably a more intelligent way. When the destination is empty or missing (rather than an update) rsync.c calls make_backup and returns 1 when it encounters if (x_lstat(fname, &sx.st, NULL) < 0) return 1; the calling code in rsync.c: if ( make_backups > 0 && overwriting_basis) {
2003 Aug 12
0
two suggestions about backup
Hi all, I am now trying to use rsync for incremental backup these days, and I have two suggestions. First, I found rsync does not make backup files in case destination files have the same name with source files. I tested in some situations as below. [Source] [Destination] [Backup] Regular file Directory Created Regular file Symlink Not created Regular
2004 Apr 22
2
[PATCH] --timelimit and --stopat
Greetings, Upon a suggestion to improve the --timelimit patch, I have also added a --stopat option. You can get the patch from this URL and/or cut/paste it from below. http://www.terry.uga.edu/~jft/rsync-timelimit-stopat.patch.gz Here are the details... --timelimit=T This option allows you to specify the maximum number of minutes rsync will run for. This time starts when
2004 Feb 09
1
[patch] Add `--link-by-hash' option.
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. Anyone have an example of an MD4 collision so I can test that case? :) Patch Summary: -1 +1 Makefile.in -0 +304 hashlink.c (new)
2004 Apr 19
3
[PATCH] time limit
Greetings, I have written a patch for rsync-2.6.1pre-2 which adds a --time-limit=T option. When this option is used rsync will stop after T minutes and exit. I think this option is useful when rsyncing a large amount of data during the night (non-busy hours), and then stopping when it is time for people to start using the network, during the day (busy hours). If this patch is accepted it may
2002 Mar 08
1
[PATCH][RFC] space saving incrementals
Please CC me directly as i'm not on the list. I have attached a patch against latest CVS (cvs diff -u) that adds the following functionality. I can break it up if you would prefer it in pieces. Comments welcome. o add compare-perms option This creates a new inode for a file even if only the perms have changed. This way if a file outside of destdir is hardlinked to a dentry inside