similar to: Recent FSF Compromise and rsync ... pgp keys?

I'm running 1.0rc23 on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, and seeing the following: Starting dovecot. Error: Can't use SSL key file /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory In the config file I have: ssl_cert_file=/usr/local/certs/imapd.pem Looking for dovecot.pem on the config file there's only: % grep dovecot.pem dovecot.conf #ssl_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem

Hello everyone, I have problem with time delaying on my CentOS powered server. I have tried to set time in BIOS and in OS (with saving time to BIOS), but time still delaying, so after month is about five minutes delayed. In past I was using this box with Windows and there wasn?t this time problem, but I cant warrant, that there are no hardware issues. So I was decided, that easiest way to fix

Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right time on the machine. This is with / without ntp. I have attempted various scenario's with no luck. I am now trying the old kernel now as I type this out. If anyone else has any

The FSF is now at 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. --- Makefile.am | 2 +- align/Makefile.am | 2 +- align/scan.c | 2 +- align/virt-alignment-scan.pod | 2 +- appliance/Makefile.am | 2 +-

Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc has allowed code in as technology previews before. For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks until gcc 4.5. So as long as it can bootstrap gcc 4.6 and works in general, dragonegg should qualify for inclusion as an

Hi Jack, > Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be > merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc > has allowed code in as technology previews before. > For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in > gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron > 2005 benchmarks until gcc 4.5. So as long as it can bootstrap > gcc 4.6 and works in general,

On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> >> Duncan, >> I'll broach the topic on gcc at gcc.gnu.org and see what the >> responses are. Why can't dragon-egg live in both places and >> be re-merged regularly? > > Re-merging it regularly sounds like it would require extra work beyond > what Duncan's already doing to maintain it.

Adjust license headers to use the current FSF postal address. Spotted by Rpmlint. --- launch-virt-p2v | 2 +- p2v.ks.in | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/launch-virt-p2v b/launch-virt-p2v index 925aa6d..5e46f42 100755 --- a/launch-virt-p2v +++ b/launch-virt-p2v @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License #

Will dovecot always be open FREE source for all? I am currently migrating my www.digipanel.com from Courier to dovecot as I think courier is overly complicated and a pain in the arse to manage all those files. anyways, I have dovecot IMAP working with MySQL auth but reading the Maildir each time takes up to 30 secs to complete. ANy ideas why? Maybe a dns resolve issue? how can I fix..

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) http://www.kiss-technology.com/support/dp-450_FAQ.asp Scroll all the way down. There is a changelog for the Firmwareupdate and a link to a zip file containing the update. -- Daniel <p>Monty wrote: Interesting bit of news this. Anyone able to independently confirm it? Monty ----- Forwarded message from "Jesse S. A.

Interesting bit of news this. Anyone able to independently confirm it? Monty <p>----- Forwarded message from "Jesse S. A. Bridgewater" <jsab@member.fsf.org> ----- Delivery-Date: Sun Dec 29 02:11:47 2002 From: "Jesse S. A. Bridgewater" <jsab@member.fsf.org> To: webmaster@xiph.org Subject: KISS DVD player with Vorbis Support Hi There, You probably know

If you check the Clang list (cfe-dev-list) the issue dealing with atomics for gcc-4.7 has been settled. I can verify this on Debian Linux using gcc-4.7 that clang/clang++ builds and no long fails when compiling a simple HelloWorld program. Atomics for c++ are now recognized as __c11_atomic_* and it builds cleanly from what i've tested. I presently don't have a 10.7 box to test against

I was unable to open this file Bill Venables' excellent "Exegeses on Linear Models" posted at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS3/Exegeses.ps.gz I'd be very interested in reading it? Thanks Esther Meenken Biometrician Crop & Food Research Private Bag 4704 Christchurch TEL: (03) 325 9639 FAX: (03) 325 2074 EMAIL:MeenkenE at crop.cri.nz Visit our website at

Hi Jack, >>> Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be >>> merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc >>> has allowed code in as technology previews before. >>> For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in >>> gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron >>> 2005 benchmarks until gcc 4.5. So as long as it

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:22:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jack, >> >>>>>      Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be >>>>> merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc >>>>> has allowed code in as technology previews

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:14:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > > > Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be > > merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc > > has allowed code in as technology previews before. > > For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in > > gcc 4.4 and produced wrong code in the Polyhedron >

Hi, the subject says it all... After some experimenting, I got a bit confused as far as what the proper thing to do might be.... I build llvm/clang from trunk sources on OSX Lion 10.7.3 (i.e. x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0 to speak GNU's platform-ese) where I also have successfully built a fsf-gcc 4.6.2 (and lately a 4.7 for that matter) from sources. Now, I think I understand that by playing

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:22:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >>>> Is there a timeline for when dragonegg might be >>>> merged into gcc (4.6 perhaps)? I ask because FSF gcc >>>> has allowed code in as technology previews before. >>>> For instance, graphite really wasn't that usable in >>>> gcc 4.4 and produced

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Can you get the product without being bound by the restrictions? > That is, can one user purchase one and resell copies without the SLA > or with their own? Not with the trademark, that is mis-appropriation. If you want to complain about Red Hat doing this, then you'll want to complain about a number of distributors well before

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:20:46PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: [distfile rerolls] > I didn't know that I was supposed to perform a security audit and I did not do > so. So if anyone happens to have the old distfile still around, please send > it my way, cause I don't. I suggest next time instead of marking a port as > BROKEN= Checksum mismatch, mark it as BROKEN= Needs