Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "questions about librsync"
2006 Feb 22
2
[librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote:
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4.
Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2003 May 10
3
benchmarking rsync's -z compression utility
Hi,
Is there a way in which rsync's -z compression (zlib) utility can be
benchmarked?
I'm trying to compare the compression ratio between rsync and external
compression tools like gzip and bzip2.
Are there any advantages to using rsync's internal compression mechanism
specified with the -z option compared to solely applying external
compression i.e. bzip2 to the files and invoking
2004 Apr 08
2
[librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for
> > case 1), 3), and 4).
>
> Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably
> something stronger than md4 like SHA-1.
md4 is probably good enough for most
2002 Apr 27
1
rsync md4sum code.
G'day,
I've been working on a Python interface to librsync and have noticed that it
uses md4sum code borrowed from Andrew Tridgell and Martin Pool that comes
via rsync and was originally written for samba.
Is there anything special about this code compared to the RSA md4sum code that
can be found with libmd <"http://www.penguin.cz/~mhi/libmd/">?
Python uses the RSA
2003 May 08
5
MD4 bug-fix for protocol version 27
Hi,
while implementing the rsync protocol in one of our projects I found
that the current CVS version still has a MD4 bug. I'm using the FreeBSD
libmd implementation and I still had checksum mismatches with protocol
version 27 for files whose size was a multiple of 64 - 4 ( - 4 due to
checksum_seed). A patch for todays CVS version is attached.
Someone should also review the clean_fname()
2003 Apr 16
1
rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues - Thanks !
Hi,
I have a unique issue that I am dealing with here.
I need to develop rsync algorithm into a library that can be re-used with my
VB / VC application on Windows platform.
I need your advice if there is any library already available on the Internet
for this? I did get librsync but that is just a header file which I do not
know how to compile also with the existing code I have.
Can you
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written,
could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's
response for the state of rsync,
2003 Apr 01
2
MD4 checksum fix
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:22:14PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> And I have several things I would like to work on and submit:
>
> - Fix the MD4 block and file checksums to comply with the rfc
> (currently MD4 is wrong for blocks of size 64*n, or files
> longer than 512MB).
>
> - Adaptive first pass checksum lengths: use 3 or more bytes of the MD4
> block
2004 Mar 10
1
MD4 checksum_seed
Hi,
The following lines in compat.c are rather imprudent:
if (read_batch || write_batch)
checksum_seed = 32761;
else
checksum_seed = time(NULL);
write_int(f_out,checksum_seed);
Setting checksum_seed to a constant in batch mode means block collisions
are reproducible and predictable. Thus, some files will be permanently
"unlucky" in batch mode and will
2003 Jul 20
2
Rolling Checksum Algorithms
Hi,
Where can I get good pointers on the rolling checksum algorithm used in rsync?
I need an 8-bit or 12-bit rolling checksum too. Any place where "rolling"
checksum algorithms are discussed?
Seun Osewa
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
2002 Nov 06
4
offline rsync
hello, I'm new to this list.
here is my question:
I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
quite slow and expensive (in Italy).
I though I could produce the "signature" of files on home computer, store
it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
altered files on
2002 Jul 31
2
new rsync release needed soon?
On the subject of needed patches, I just recently completed a patch for
librsync that fixed the mdfour code to have uint_64 or 2 uint_32's for
size. Without this, the checksums on files >512Megs are incorrect. The
code should drop into rsync without a hitch. The same goes for mdfour in
samba, becuase that is where librsync got the code from anyway.
Robert Weber
University of
2003 Dec 02
1
rdiff
Is there any chance for rdiff ?
I need to frequently synchronize big text file (60MB+) undertaking small
changes and I am interested in differences between the subsequent versions
[DNS RBL data in dnsbl format, 1E6+ lines of text, new version every 20m, on
average 50 new entries (lines) in every synchronization]
I would like to get (small) diff file as result of rsync session and apply it
to
2004 May 03
1
gzip-rsyncable.diff
Hi,
I currently create large (500MB-2.5GB) tar.gz files that I am trying to
get to rsync better. After doing some research by reading a lecture
presented by the original author of rsync and googling the list
archives, I have concluded that the gzip-rsyncable.diff is the best way
to get gzipped files to rsync nicely. The only version I could find of
this patch is available here:
2002 Jun 21
2
Release 3 of "rzync" new-protocol test
For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic]
test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might
not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based
on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page:
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html
Here's the tar file of the new
2003 Apr 17
0
rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues -Thanks !
Hi Donovan,
Thank you for the insight. I will keep you posted on this.
Best Regards
Naveen A.
>From: Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au>
>To: Naveen Athresh <naveenathresh@hotmail.com>
>CC: rsync@samba.org,librsync developers list
><librsync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>Subject: Re: rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues
>-Thanks
2002 Aug 05
1
rsync for PDAs?
I've been working for the past few months with open-source solutions for
syncing Palm PDAs (Coldsync, mostly). I've been becoming increasingly
annoyed with Palm's Desktop Link Protocol and the sync mechanism, and am
considering replacing it with a third-party application for the Palm. Since
I've had good luck with rsync in the past, its seemed an obvious choice.
I've
2003 Apr 23
2
Fixing some exclude/include bugs
As threatened a while back, there are some exclude/include bugs that I'd
like to see fixed in rsync. Here is the patch:
http://www.blorf.net/rsync-exclude.patch
This fixes the following bugs:
- A non-anchored, slash-including pattern with a wildcard needs to be
matched at the end of the path (e.g. "CVS/R* should match throughout
the tree, not just at /CVS/R*).
- A leading
2003 Jul 30
2
Large files and symlinks
Hi,
I'm mirroring a single server to multiple clients. Currently I'm using
scp, but I (think I) want to use rsync.
The files I'm mirroring are large - c.4GB (video data)
Each client has a different set of these files.
The transfer is done over the internet, and may fail (regularly!).
I set up a separate directory for each client, and put in symlinks to
the actual files (maximum
2002 Apr 20
2
Patch: update popt/ to 1.5.1
This patch updates the files under popt/ to the latest vendor drop. The only
change is the inclusion of a FreeBSD-specific patch to popt.c. This is needed
in case somebody decides to build rsync on that platform without using the
port. I'm not happy about the wording in popt/README.rsync so I may change it.
The patch is available at
http://www.catnook.com/rsync-popt-1.5.1.patch
Comments