similar to: Deletion of files only on remote system is not logged

I was told that my earlier submission of this report contained a user-hostile attachment (courtesy of Outlook), so here it is again, with the log included below. The problem: Files that exist only on the remote system are deleted silently (i.e. not logged), rather than noisily as implied by the recommendation of --dry-run in the rsync man page definition of --delete to see what would be

I am a little confused regarding the above files. As I read the man pages, the passwd file is for the password of the user as which the rsync server runs - on the server machine. The secrets files (AFAIK) contain the name:password for the valid users of rsync. Some problems that arose ("address family not supported") went away after I updated both this file and the password file. These

The attached script file gives all the relevant details - I hope - please ask if you need any more information. /Sam Sam Sexton <mailto:sam.sexton@reuters.com> Reuters Coventry Automated Dealing Technologies Phone: +44 24 7625 6562 Fax: +44 24 7655 5203 -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Visit our Internet site at

Please see the attached file and let me know if you need any more information. /Sam Sam Sexton <mailto:sam.sexton@reuters.com> Reuters Coventry Automated Dealing Technologies Phone: +44 24 7625 6562 Fax: +44 24 7655 5203 --------------------------------------------------------------- - Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Get closer to the

I sent three messages to the list on Tuesday, but none of them have reached the archive, and I've not seen a reply. I'll send the other two separately. The problem may be at my end, but I didn't get any error messages. /Sam Sam Sexton <mailto:sam.sexton@reuters.com> Reuters Coventry Automated Dealing Technologies Phone: +44 24 7625 6562 Fax: +44 24 7655 5203

I'm setting rsync up for the first time and would prefer to have the exclude file defined in the conf file, but the exclusions aren't honoured when I define the parameter in rsyncd.conf - although they are when I specify the file in an argument. The server is the remote system and both rsyncd.conf and the exclude file are the same on both local and remote systems. I'm attaching the

hi, we're using a samba-server over DSL using openVPN and the speed is very good at browsing directories and quite OK at loading/saving files except for word & excel where it takes about 20-30 seconds to save even a small file. which is no wonder because the following happens in log.smbd when i click "save" in word, it obviously checks for a bazillion tmp- and lockfiles (

Hello, Can someone explain why my exclude option is not excluding filles as instructed in my script below. I have tried multiple methods and still have been unsuccessful in excluding the one file "test.sql". The methods I have tried are: 1. Removing EXTRAFLAG variable -a 2. Removing using -a 3. Option --include infront of --exclude and behind of --exclude. 4. rsync /software/testdir/

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Bug ID: 11545 Summary: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

First - many, many congrats to team ZFS. Developing/writing a new Unix fs is a very non-trivial exercise with zero tolerance for developer bugs. I just loaded build 27a on a w1100z with a single AMD 150 CPU (2Gb RAM) and a single (for now) SCSI disk drive: FUJITSU MAP3367NP (Revision: 0108) hooked up to the built-in SCSI controller (the only device on the SCSI bus). My initial ZFS test was to

Hello, after upgrading from Samba 3.5.6 to 3.6.5 I encounter some strange NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED trouble when trying to access group readable directories from Windows 7 or Windows 2008 Terminal Server. Very strange stuff is that it works fine using smbclient from a Linux machine using the same userid and Kerberos authentication. The Server is fully integrated into active directory and uses

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hello, I have installed CentOS 4.8 with samba 3.0.33. After joining to AD, group permission do not work. After "net groupmap add..." command nothing changed: # getfacl TESTDIR/ # file: TESTDIR # owner: root # group: testgroup user::rwx group::rwx other::--- user1 is in group "testgroup" net groupmap list testgroup (S-1-5-21-2207241064-1835560224-3992551478-2193) ->

Dear all, I have some troubles using the stemming algorithm provided by the tm (text mining) + Snowball packages. Here is my config: MacOS 10.5 R 2.12.0 / R 2.13.1 / R 2.14.1 (I have tried several versions) I have installed all the needed packages (tm, rJava, rWeka, Snowball) + dependencies. I have desactivated AWT (like written in

I'll rephrase my question... When a user gets their password wrong more than MaxAuthTries times why isn't the message "Too many authentication failures for %.100s" written to syslog? The user seems to get it (in a dialog in putty) but it doesn't get logged. The usual "Failed password for..." messages are logged. Regards, Richard Dickens -----Original Message-----

Hi, Please provide the gluster volume info. Do you see any errors in the client mount log file (/var/log/glusterfs/var-lib-mountedgluster.log)? Thanks, Nithya On 6 November 2017 at 05:13, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see > directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5043 Summary: Qualified non-inherited filter rules may be ignored Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. We can see files, but not directories (with ls, find etc...) We can enter (cd) into directories, even if we can't see them. - Host typology is: 2 replica, 1 arbiter. - Volumes are: replicated and running on XFS on the hosts. - Clients are: GlusterFS native

Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain

hi, I have an 20G archive of pic files which would have to be mirrored onto another server. It contains large JPEGs, around 10k files, one of the servers is located in Boston, the another is in Budapest, Hungary. I use rsync rsync://remote_box/remotedir localdir/ -zcvr --progress --size-only The issue is that the remote server sends the filelist very slow. Looking into the rsyncd process with