similar to: rsync over ssh performance problem in cygwin

Has anyone else experienced high CPU usage when using RSYNC in windows 2000 server? I am using the rsync.exe (and applicable DLL's) from the cygwin installation (I am not however running cygwin on this machine). The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the windows machine, which has a much

Hi, I have a setup that rsyncs (using the rsync protocol without rsh/ssh logins) from one windows server (A) to a NAS (B) via a second windows server (C) (A is on a separate location from B & C, and the NAS doesn't support rsync directly), where C stores data on an SMB share on B. My problem is that I often get "No such host or network path (136)" from rsync (robocopy or

Hello! Here is request to 2.2.8a: [dm@dm-amd64 /]$ nmblookup -R -U 192.168.6.10 center querying center on 192.168.6.10 192.168.22.224 center<00> And here is to 3.0.2a: [dm@dm-amd64 /]$ nmblookup -R -U 192.168.22.220 center querying center on 192.168.22.220 name_query failed to find name center Certanly, all is OK in DNS, I have in smb.conf dns proxy = yes Today I upgraded 2.2.8a

If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't matter the number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the speakers are playing slightly different signals (e.g. from a stereo song). Jean-Marc Quoting Greger Burman <greger at mobile-robotics.com>: > One thing I can think of is if you are using two or more speakers. If the > speakers are not at the exact same

The reasons I have posted these questions are: 1) To find out if Speex can take advantage of SIMD extensions. 2) To maybe learn from someone with previous experience in optimizing Speex for moderns x86 architectures before I set off trying all kinds of things on my own. See answers inline: 2009/6/15 Tom Grandgent <tom at grandgent.com> > Why haven't you tried using release build

I'll test very interesting plugin xexec. It seems very nice and can be used in many things. It's compiled perfect with dovecot 1.0, but certanly not with dovecot 1.1. It's stopped with next error: In file included from cmd-xexec.c:30: xexec.h:8: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'array_t' cmd-xexec.c: In function 'cmd_xexec': cmd-xexec.c:134: error:

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: comunip.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1663 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.gif

I actually forgot to mention that I'm using ultra-wideband mode, but seems like you understood that anyway. Is this true that Speex echo cancellation only performs well in narrowband mode !? I've been using 100 ms as the default tail length. I don't know what the ideal tail length would be. I have tried shorter and longer tails but it hasn't made any difference. Does

Hello. I have the following situation. AEC is used in network chat software over DirectSound API. Echo and reference signals are almost aligned (delay is no more than 30ms). When echo is emulated in notebook (built-in speakers + mic) everything goes fine and echo is cancelled. But when configuration includes stand-alone speakers and mic no echo is removed. Audio is in 22050 hz at 16 bit

First of all, thank you for your input Tim. That is very helpful. I would love to hear from other people with experience of AEC and Speex. I guess I have to split my question into to parts now. 1. Is it a fact that using the windows multimedia API (wave audio) for audio capture and playback makes it impossible to do echo cancellation with Speex AEC or other EC method due to inprecise timing? I

Hello? I am a new user of speex.I am currently working on speex frames and I have some questions. I am using narrowband and long tail length, and it works very well with speex test DEMO. But it is very difficult to have speaker input in perfect sync with mic input. Speex does not work at all. Any suggestion? Regards? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

On 2010-03-16 14:22, Josh Gargus wrote: >> If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't >> matter the number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the >> speakers are playing slightly different signals (e.g. from a stereo >> song). > > Does "tricky" mean that the Speex AEC won't handle such situations > well? Or just that you

Hi, I've used rsync successfully for several years, syncing between two Windows 2000 servers using daemon mode, but today I stumbled accross something peculiar. I'm using cygwin with rsync 2.6.0 at both ends (the latest available at this date) and I have a file that rsync considers up to date even though both the md5 and a normal diff show differences. I've tried calling rsync

I believe there is a documentation error regarding speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess_state, request, ptr); The manual states: SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE Turns denoising on(1) or off(2) SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_AGC Turns automatic gain control (AGC) on(1) or off(2) I noticed that setting a value of 0 turns the setting off. Setting a value of 1 or 2 turns the setting on. While I do think 1 and 0 is more

I have a question about the overall performance of Speex and what I can do to improve it. I'm running Speex Windows x86, Visual C++ EE compiler. I will say right away that I've only compiled debug so far and used no compiler optimizations at all. I use the uwb-mode, preprocessing, denoising and echo cancellation. I've noticed that speex consumes a lot of cpu resources. When I run this

--- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 22 +++++++--------------- src/inspect-fs.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index 8ffd85d..c9bbad9 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static int check_hostname_unix (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static

I've seen this consistently on three systems, with three different cards, and multiple versions of DAHDI. At first I thought the issue only occurred on newer, Nehalem-based, systems, but I reproduced it on a Core 2 Duo box as well. I've tested with dahdi-linux 2.2.0.2, dadhi- linux-complete 2.0.0+2.0.0, 2.1.0.2+2.1.0.2, and 2.2.0.2+2.2.0. The card is a Digium TE220B which uses the

On 2/20/2018 8:29 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:04:29PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>>> Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >>>>

On 2/20/2018 8:29 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:04:29PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>>> Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >>>>

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on