similar to: release date for rsync 2.5.7?

Tevfik On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 18:13, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote: > I would also like to inform that I updated my cwRsync package with the > latest rsync binary (2.5.7). http://itefix.no/cwrsync I have tried your rsync 2.5.7 in cygwin under Windows 2000, synchronising to a windows share on an unknown (probably Windows) file server. Sorry to report that it hangs at the end of transfer, as did

Hello All, I am developing a JRuby on Rails 3 application. Standard stuff. I am facing problems getting autotest to run. Here''s the trace: % autotest loading autotest/rails_rspec2 bundle exec /Users/manish/Foo/Foo-Server/jruby-1.5.2/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-core-2.0.0.beta.22/bin/rspec

Even after all the sequence of commands below bit-code is not showing any effect of loop-unrolling *manish at manish:~/Test2$ llvm-gcc-4.2 -O2 -emit-llvm Hello.c -c -o Hello.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loops Hello.bc -o Hello1.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -loopsimplify Hello1.bc -o Hello2.bc* *manish at manish:~/Test2$ opt-2.8 -indvars Hello2.bc -o Hello3.bc* *manish at

1. You should run the passes in the same opt command, for passes like loops which is an analysis pass provides results to the following passes. 2. You can pass a -debug flag to opt to see the some debugging info. 3. I tried this opt -mem2reg -loops -loopsimplify -loop-unroll -unroll-count=3 -debug loop.o -o tt.bc and got this message. Loop Size = 14 Can't unroll; loop not terminated by

Hi Renato, Thanks! I will make sure the patches are posted to the correct mailing list. Manish On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Renato Golin Linaro < renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Manish, > > Thanks for the patch, I'll check and commit. > > cheers, > --renato > > PS: Patches are normally sent to llvm-commit list, unless they require a > lot of

The README at the location shared by John says "DSA is undergoing significant changes and may not be entirely stable or correct. See lib/DSA/README" So, I was wondering from where should one pick the code. Although I will start my analysis and see how results turn out to be. But any comments on this line will be helpful. Thanks Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Manish Gupta

On 8/4/11 2:45 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > Hey John, > > Yes this is what I am looking for. I wrote a code as I described in my > first mail and I am getting desired result except when the chain > encounters load instruction (you have also mentioned the that u skip > loads). Okay. Just out of curiosity, is your static slice local (stopping at function arguments) or

Hi Manish, Thanks for the patch, I'll check and commit. cheers, --renato PS: Patches are normally sent to llvm-commit list, unless they require a lot of discussion. On 15 January 2013 14:52, Manish Verma <manish.avtaar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Transform/LoopStrengthReduction/post-inc-icmpzero.ll was failing for > clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 build-bot configuration.

On 12/19/2017 03:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and

On 12/19/2017 02:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and

Thanks Everyone for the info. I am planning to work with DSA on llvm-2.9. Hope it is working as John mentioned. Manish On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:06 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 9/19/11 9:12 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am curious to know the reason for removal of andersen pointer analysis. > Is it because of some issues? We

Hey John, Yes this is what I am looking for. I wrote a code as I described in my first mail and I am getting desired result except when the chain encounters load instruction (you have also mentioned the that u skip loads). I think the recursive trace back for a Value V depending on Operands (o1,...oN) should terminate at the nearest definition of the oN (i.e. it is not an instruction but a LLVM

On 8/4/11 1:53 PM, Manish Gupta wrote: > It would be great help if someone can point me to similar code in > Analysis or Transform, i.e. tracing value dependencies chains. If I understand correctly, given an instruction I, you want to find its operands o1 through oN, and then find the instructions (or LLVM values) that generate the values o1 through oN, and then find the instructions

Hello there,, My self is MANISH KUMAR <http://astriskmanish.wordpress.com/>, i m a some wat new user of LINUX , presently i am using UBUNTU 6.06 Dapper Dark. So some how i need a indian msnger named as REDIFF BOL<http://messenger.rediff.com/newbol/>, on this ubuntu. i have searched a lot on GOOGLE,, then i got some idea abt i can configure it by using WINE. So can any one tell me what

Manish Jain wrote: > > On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and installed the version you indicated, but >>>> I >>>> get nothing at all: >>>> >>>> /home/bourne # teamviewer

Dear Manish, First, in answer to your original question: yes, there is a pass that will convert constant expression GEPs used within LLVM instructions into GEP instructions. SAFECode has a pass called BreakConstantGEPs in safecode/trunk/lib/ArrayBoundChecks/BreakConstantGEPs.cpp (http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/safecode/trunk/lib/ArrayBoundChecks/BreakConstantGEPs.cpp?view=log). It

Hello all, I saw on the Release notes that 2.6.0 is using protocol version 27 which is different than 2.5.7 and 2.5.6. I did a quick peak through the rest of the release notes and quickly browsed the archives on the list and I didn't see any notes on how well 2.6.0 works with older versions of rsync. At our site, we do have 2.5.7 and 2.5.6 installed. Are there any documented problems when

It would be great help if someone can point me to similar code in Analysis or Transform, i.e. tracing value dependencies chains. Thanks, Manish On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Manish Gupta <manishg at cs.ucsd.edu> wrote: > Hello All, > > What would be the best way to trace Value Dependency Chains in LLVM. Can I > use some API to perform this? > > The use-def chain

Hi, You might want to try running -loops -loop-simplify before loop unroll. >From loop simplify.cpp This pass performs several transformations to transform natural loops into a00011 // simpler form, which makes subsequent analyses and transformations simpler and00012 // more effective. Arushi On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Manish Gupta <mgupta.iitr at gmail.com> wrote: > You

Hello R community members, I'm trying to install the 'rqpd' package which is developed by Roger Koenker and Stefan Bache. When I try to install the package using the command 'install.packages("rqpd",repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org")' I'm getting the following two messages: i) package ?rqpd? is available as a source package but not as a binary