similar to: ACL Support? Where can I get it?

I did testing on generating this report from a 130 MB Quickbooks file. Locally, 15 seconds. Samba Server, 1:35. Shared off of my win98 Workstation, 2+ mins. I do not understand the reason it is SOO slow. I know it is a fairly large file. The only explanation I can come up with is the way QuickBooks is accessing the files. Maybe jumping all around the file, requiring many operations on the

I haven't seen anything about this here and thought I should pass it along. christopher neitzert <chris at neitzert.com> made two postings to the full-disclosure list earlier today. They stated, in part: ***** Does anyone know of or have source related to a new, and unpublished ssh exploit? An ISP I work with has filtered all SSH connections due to several root level incidents

I have a Cisco VPN Concentrator 3000, It has the ability to auth PPTP tunnels off of a WinNT Domain controler. Well, I to use my samba3 box instead of a WinNT box. I have samba3 running off of an LDAP back end. Anyway, I setup the VPN Concentrator to auth off of the samba box, and when I test it with the test option, and it works, but when I try to auth a pptp tunnel, it fails saying the

I have a project that requires that I have two file servers physically separated, both of which need to be able to written to and synced using rsync. I'm not worried about rsync, I'm really worried about users deleting files, because if they delete files on one side, they would just get replicated back from the other side. I have thought about hacking up a script that logs into the

I'm a college student, but I also have an private network behind my firewall at college, and I have an ipsec tunnel to my office. I had to recently use the printer port on my firewall, so I ended up installing samba, and told it only to talk to my office network. Well, it managed to pick up the browser list..... and it got ahold of a local browser role as soon as it came up because I have a

Hello Eric, I am taking Buck and the rsync mailing list into the CC. Buck is the author of the rsync patch, he may know more on that problem. On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:16, Eric Chen wrote: > From my understanding, the effecive rights mask 'limits the effective > rights granted to all groups and to named users', so if you getfacl on a > file, the group permissions will be

So I get a phone call about my companie's controler not being able to log into samba. About two weeks ago we migrated from Win2k Server to Samba running on LDAP. What would be the default value that sambaPwdMustChange would be incremented? This is NT Time Right (1 unit for every 100 ms from 1600 right?) I just had to bump everybody what I'm guessing is three weeks, but I need to know

there's an unsupported, it-works-for-us patch that's seen a bit of testing on Solaris 2.6/8 and rudimentary testing on Linux with Andre- as G's ACL implementation. most of the code is ripped straight out of the samba 2.2.5 source tree; the rest of it is stuff that i don't expect anybody to ever seriously consider merging into the rsync tree and which i wouldn't defend against

It's been working for me for almost two years now. You do have to have the proper prereqs in place, of course (like GnuWin32, Python, etc). ~Aaron On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Alright, that's good news! When was this fixed? > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at

Alright, that's good news! When was this fixed? On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>wrote: > The tests have worked fine on Windows for a while now when building > with an MSVC environment. As for the tests failing, what tests are > failing for you? Can you pastebin the results? I have seen issues > with MSVC11, but not MSVC10. >

The tests have worked fine on Windows for a while now when building with an MSVC environment. As for the tests failing, what tests are failing for you? Can you pastebin the results? I have seen issues with MSVC11, but not MSVC10. Thanks! ~Aaron On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Last time I checked, running the tests on

On 13 Nov 2017, at 18:26, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com<mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: Hi Kristof, On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com<mailto:Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>> wrote: Hi Quentin, My only remaining concern is around ABI compatibility. The following commit seems to indicate that in the previous round of

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote: > It is my understanding that all you need to do is specify let isTarget = > 1 in your .td file and it will generate target specific intrinsics. This > should allow you to keep the IntrinsicsPTX.td file in the same location. > So we keep the intrinsics defined in include/llvm/IntrinsicsPTX.td?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Justin, > > sorry for the delay, I have been busy. > > Micah's proposal requires to move the definitions of the intrinsics > from include/llvm/IntrinsicsPTX.td to lib/Target/PTX/PTXIntrinsics.td > thus allowing the generation of the file PTXGenIntrinsics.inc which > will be

On Nov 23, 2011 8:33 AM, "Justin Holewinski" <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 23, 2011 6:57 AM, "Alberto Magni" <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > > Alberto, > > > The AMDIL backend solves your problem

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Justin Holewinski" <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "David A. Greene" <dag at cray.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 2:19:01 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Documentation of

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Magni >> >

Does this count have to be exact, or just an accurate approximation? The back-end may add/remove registers fairly late in the codegen process, so if you need an exact count you may need to run *just* before the assembly printer. Perhaps we could introduce a special machine node that represents a shared memory allocation. The node's value would be the shared address space pointer of the

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Alberto, >  The AMDIL backend solves your problem with intrinsic overloading this way: > def int_AMDIL_mad     : GCCBuiltin<"__amdil_mad">, TernaryIntFloat; > > Where TernaryIntFloat is defined as: > class TernaryIntFloat : >          Intrinsic<[llvm_anyfloat_ty],

It's been on the back-burner for awhile. I'll clean it up and post it for review soon. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:25:25PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at