Displaying 20 results from an estimated 130 matches similar to: "Two --bwlimit issues"
2008 Nov 28
1
True ActiveRecord result set iteration
Hello,
For an internal project we were looking for a solution which extends
ActiveRecord by an iterator function. Using find(:all) is no fun if you
have to process some 10.000 records.
Until now there have been two ways of dealing with that scenario:
- write your logic a second times (e.g. use stored procedure)
- bet on AR plugins which work around that limitation by fetching IDs and
2005 Apr 27
7
[Bug 2654] timeout is always triggered with 2.6.4
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2654
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-27 02:21 -------
The generator's setting of the ignore_timeout
2005 Feb 23
1
Rsync 2.6.4pre1 has been released
I have released rsync 2.6.4pre1 -- the first preview release of 2.6.4.
Please try it out and send feedback to the mailing-list or directly to
me, as appropriate.
For a list of what has changed since 2.6.3, see the NEWS file:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre1-NEWS
For the tar file itself, you'll find it here (with its signature):
2005 Feb 23
1
Rsync 2.6.4pre1 has been released
I have released rsync 2.6.4pre1 -- the first preview release of 2.6.4.
Please try it out and send feedback to the mailing-list or directly to
me, as appropriate.
For a list of what has changed since 2.6.3, see the NEWS file:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre1-NEWS
For the tar file itself, you'll find it here (with its signature):
2005 Mar 02
1
rsync scalability [Virus checked]
Hello rsync-users,
I need to transfer an PC image-file (200 to 400 MB) to 500 locations,
which are
equal as concurrent users on the day X.
what parameters do you suggest to use on the central rsync-server?
any recommendation for socket options?
is it a good idea to split the file into several pieces, let?s say 10 MB ?
Does this speed up the blocksum calculation or is it better to leave the
2002 Nov 08
1
Using LDAP with samba
is it possible and how difficult is it, to use LDAP for all the user
accounts and groups and password management? would this be something you
would want to do? or is it better to stick with samba's initila way of
dealing with users?
Caleb O'Connell
caleb@lincoln.midcoast.com
(207)882-7792
2003 Jun 20
0
(code 12) at io.c(177) error
We are using rsync to backup files from a bunch of computers to a central
server using rsync in --daemon mode. I've got a problem and are looking
for suggestions.
I'm not a newbie to rsync and have checked the archives without getting
any useable conclusions.
Our old server works great - a redhat 7.2 / 2.4.18 machine. But it's
getting full and there's no more updates for
2009 Mar 23
0
bwlimit only on server side
I want to use rsync under the control (ie. initiated from) the client
side, but with the bandwidth controlled by the server side. I can force
the bwlimit option on the command line executed on the server, but will
this make a difference given that the files are being sent from client to
server?
If not, is there some other way to limit this bandwidth inbound to the
server? I know that I can
2002 Apr 04
1
--bwlimit server-side (in rsyncd.conf)?
Is there any plan to do it?
Is it maybe already in and just not documented?
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
2013 Feb 13
2
[Bug 9660] New: rsync --daemon --bwlimit does not work on server side
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9660
Summary: rsync --daemon --bwlimit does not work on server side
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: mopp at gmx.net
2012 Sep 28
1
dynamic bwlimit with rsync
Hi,
Is there a way to do rsync with varying bwlimit during the transfer. I tried to look using Linux 'tc' but it looks trivial. Do somebody has working model for it?
Our pipe is limited and we don't want to give everything to rsync, We have situation where we want rsync transfers to scale up or down within a specified bandwidth limit. For e.g. if there are two (or multiple) rsyncs
2003 Mar 17
0
scp.c: u_int64_t in bwlimit()
u_int64_t has been introduced into scp.c with the new bwlimit
function causing some platforms to break.
Would this work?
-----------------------------------
--- scp.c.old 2003-03-09 17:16:43.000000000 -0800
+++ scp.c 2003-03-16 16:17:57.095520029 -0800
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@
{
static struct timeval bwstart, bwend;
static int lamt, thresh = 16384;
- u_int64_t wait;
+ off_t wait;
struct
2003 Jun 18
0
bwlimit patch.
Hi,
I Emailed this afternoon that bwlimit leads to a much too low
bwlimit if small amounts of data are sent in each write. I
wrote a small patch now.
Congrats on the code: It's nice and clean: I wrote a working
patch in 5 minutes after examining a total of 25 lines of code.
(My backup used to require two hours of small sleeps alone,
which should be reduced by a factor of 8....)
2004 Nov 04
1
Problems with --bwlimit && --daemon
Hi list,
I couldn't find anything related to this, on mailing lists or even bugzilla,
so here it is.
A problem with this combination exists in the new 2.6.3 where the bwlimit
code got rewritten and is not present at <= 2.6.2.
The problem is that on io.c:882 bwlimit_writemax is also used to control the
bandwidth, but it is not initialized for the daemon mode.
At options.c:772 you can see
2004 Nov 17
1
specifying --bwlimit together with --daemon fails
I received a bug report that starting with 2.6.3, rsync fails when
started from inetd with the --bwlimit option (actually, I narrowed it
down to that :-). Earlier rsync versions did work.
What I see from the strace output is that the rsync --daemon process
sets fd 0 to ON_NONBLOCK, then does a select() on fd 0 for write (which
shows it's ready for writing), and then does a write of zero
2005 Jan 13
1
--bwlimit doesn't work for daemon mode
[I'm not subscribed, please CC me on replies]
Some time after 2.6.0 the --bwlimit code was enhanced, but the code now
doesn't work anymore when you set the bandwidth limit for the daemon and
generates error log entries like:
2005/01/13 08:17:03 [29636] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 12 \
bytes: phase "unknown" [receiver]: Success (0)
2005/01/13 08:17:03 [29636]
2005 Jun 14
0
[Bug 2800] New: bwlimit effects checksum speed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2800
Summary: bwlimit effects checksum speed
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: schwern@pobox.com
QAContact:
2006 Feb 28
1
Rsync with bwlimit
Hi,
Any one give me some sample code with bwlimit option.
what's is the std/ recommended value for this?
2006 Mar 03
1
changing bwlimit at runtime.
I am using rsync in a situation where the amount of bwlimit I want to
use changes depending on the time of day.
for example, I start rsync at 2am when no-one else is using the system,
so I want it to use 100k/sec. At 9am, it is still running, but as the
bandwidth of the link it's using now needs to be shared with other
users, I would like rsync to only use 10k/sec.
Any way of doing this
2007 Feb 16
3
--bwlimit -z limits filesystem speed, not network speed
My impression when running with --bwlimit in combination with
compression -z is that the speed to the filesystem is limited to the
value given in --bwlimit.
This must be contrary to the intention with --bwlimit.
David