similar to: Logging on the rsync server from a client connect

-----Original Message----- From: Susan Ator Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:32 PM To: 'jw schultz' Subject: RE: Logging on the rsync server from a client connect Thanks. It turns out I needed to add rsync to my ipchains. Once I did that I was able to connect correctly and log the information. I knew it was something really really basic on my end. sa -----Original Message-----

Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ... root at sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-* -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.ko -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 10808 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko

Hello list, please spend a minute considering these facts and maybe there is something to improve: 1) VIA Eden based board can write AES256 encrypted information on HDD at > 60MB/s 2) iperf shows NIC speed 69MB/s 3) openssl tests have even better results 4) openssh can transfer AES256 encrypted information at < 27MB/s (and worse with HDD encryption) It is better with openssh 5.x, than

I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC on X86 could consider looking into adding support for the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? If anyone is up for it there are details within these two bug reports.. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

Hi all, attached is a patch that enables using hardware crypto accelerators available through OpenSSL library for SSH operations. Especially in ssh/sshd it can bring a significant speed improvement. OTOH if no crypto engine is available, nothing bad happens and default software crypto routines are used. This patch is used in SUSE Linux OpenSSH package and proved to work (at least it didn't

On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/X86InstrSystem.td perhaps. -- Stephen Checkoway

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Covington <cov at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 10:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Hi all- >> >> I would like to standardize on a very simple protocol by which a guest >> OS can obtain an RNG seed early in boot. >> >> The main design requirements are: >> >> - The interface should be

Hi, I''m using Shorewall and LSM to load-balance 3 ISPs. My configuration works, but when an ISP is disabled, LSM is unable to ping from the associated interface. I understand why it happens : when `shorewall disable isp1` is called, Shorewall flushes the routing table isp1, and removes the nexthop in the balance table. So when I want to ping 8.8.8.8 from eth1, no rule allows it.

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0500, Stephen Checkoway wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > > > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? > > > Take a look at

Hi, I am running Samba 2.2.1 on a Redhat 7.2 machine and have the following in smb.conf: workgroup = AGS_NT security = domain password server = mocha bigblue encrypt passwords = yes everything else is default. "mocha" is the PDC and is a NT4 box". The machine has joined the domain with "smbpasswd -j AGS_NT". When using "smbpasswd

Hello. I am new to this forum. If this issue has been discussed already, please inform me, but my STFW have indicated that it has not. If SS7 were available on * would it make commercial sense to use it? There are case studies on the web (courtesy of the Death Star :->) for ISPs with 10,000+ subscriber lines showing clear cost savings in transitioning from PRI to SS7 controlled IMT. My

I've installed LE certs on my Dovecot a while back, and, it has been working OK since, but, today, an iPhone user said he can't get emails as iphone says 'cert is expired', searching around, I see some other iPhone similar issues reported, do I have my conf correct, I have; # cat dovecot.conf | grep ssl ssl = required verbose_ssl = no ssl_cert =

Hi list, I am still having troubles with rsync, as on large areas in our setup, it keeps dying unexpectedly. See my previous post two days ago for the initial tries. I realize it is a somewhat broad question, but how do I troubleshoot these disconnects? Im no great programmer, although we have a few good c programmers around, and if needed I can ask for their help. But for now, my thinking is,

I downloaded InstantRails 1.3a, and unzipped it to c:\InstantRails I then ran gem install rails --include-dependencies in the Ruby Console Window A lot of it worked, but I saw these errors (with a bit of surrounding output) Installing RDoc documentation for activerecord-1.15.3... Installing RDoc documentation for actionpack-1.13.3... lib/action_controller/routing.rb:1061:30:

I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB

I got roughly the same performance results when I use the openssl speed test with and without a hifn 7956 cryto card Here's what I did: After the card is plugged in, kldload hifn; kldload cryptodev; I got the message: hifn0 mem 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff irg 28 at device 3.0 on pci1 hifn0: Hifn 7956, rev 0, 32KB dram, pll=0x800<pci clk, 4x