similar to: PATCH: rsyncd.conf permission options

In the bufferbloat age, anything that can make for a kinder, gentler bulk transfer protocol seems desirable. This add support for user and server selectable congestion control algorithms. As examples: --congestion-alg=lp # For the tcp-lp algorithm on the command line Or in a subsection: [mystuff] congestion alg = westwood # for a wireless connection And diffserv support: --diffserv=8 for

Hi folks, This is a patch for rsync 2.6.9 - I'm not sure if this is the proper vehicle for submitting them. It's been working great for us for months, and I hope it's seen as offering useful utility in general. Steve (who is not a subscriber to this list) --- Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | +1 714 544-6561 www.unixwiz.net | Tustin, Calif. USA |

Hi, a few months ago I posted a message about using LDAP to store rsync secrets in LDAP. I received a response about patching the rsync source code with a patch file. I am now finally getting around to doing this, and when I tried to use the patch command 'patch --verbose ./rsync-2.5.6/authenticate.c rsync-ldap.patch' , it gives me the following error: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff

In case others find this of value, I wrote a patch to rsync 2.5.6 to give rsync in --daemon mode the ability to run a pre-transfer and post-transfer command. These options handle our need to prepare a server to receive files and to do some processing after receiving files. The options for /etc/rsyncd.conf are pretransfer script = /some/command/to/run posttransfer script =

Hi, I'm trying to get rsync 2.5.6 to authenticate users via openldap-2.0.23. I was looking through the mailing list archives and found a patch for rsync-2.4.6 that does this for me. I was just wondering if this is still valid, or if there has been a new patch or new implementation that has superceded this patch. Any help would be great. The message I am referring to is as follows:

----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> ----- From: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> To: samba-technical@samba.org Cc: jra@samba.org Subject: Patch to improve Samba write speeds on Linux ext3 with 3.2.x Reply-To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Hi all, Intel recently did some research on Samba write speeds, tested in Linux using ext3 resulting in the following

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

We use rsync to provide an rsync share on a linux server with a javascript program on Windows clients which ensures all client data is backed up each morning. After making no progress with my posting last month regarding making a module upload only to prevent someone from manually downloading the rsync share obtaining other users work (exclude = * wasn't possible because we need --delete to

Hi! I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When set to true, this option forbids the transfers from server to the client, thus solving

I'm preparing to roll out a bunch of win XP clients and and am running down all the quirks that come up in the application log on my test box. 1) AutoEnrollement fails - samba is not an active directory so this makes sense it must be disabled by editing the group policy with gpedit.msc computer configuration->windows settings -> security settings -> public key policies ->

--- .../smbdotconf/printing/spoolssbackchannel.xml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ source3/include/proto.h | 1 + source3/param/loadparm.c | 12 ++++++++++++ source3/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Hi, If anyone is interested, the included patch to rsync-2.6.2 allows you to specify the port number for an rsync server as a global option in rsyncd.conf with 'port = <N>' (where <N> is your favorite port number). Note that this parameter only takes effect when the server is started, not when clients connect. Also, specifying the port in rsyncd.conf takes precedence

Hey there, I am, for the first time, playing around with Samba seriously (mainly thinking about replacing NFS with it). I'm using a Linux 2.6.x client with the cifs.ko kernel module/filesystem type. I've found that I can't change the permissions on files to arbitrary values; they must not be greater than the bits specified in 'create mask' (and friends). The problem appears

That doesn't help my version of the problem, though. My create mask is 701, but Photoshop is creating files with permissions 777. -----Original Message----- From: Tim Allen [mailto:timallen@ls82.fsnet.co.uk] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:28 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Adobe Photoshop uses wrong permissions when saving What is force create mode set to? It defaults to 0,

hi*& Samba has troubles with joining to NT PDC, that has some scope id because: 1. smbpasswd does not know anything about scope id and you haven't any chance to join into NT PDC. 2. also many utils like smbmount doesn't know scope id 3. In smbclient you can specify scope id, but you should remember it and etc. It's not so usable. I'm asked about these problems in samba

winbind primary group = 213478 winbind force primary = no // this is the default, but I just wanted to be explicit Stephen A Jazdzewski Steve@Jazd.com <<samba-2.2.4-forceprimarygrouprid.patch>> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C1FC4A.A7164AC0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="samba-2.2.4-forceprimarygrouprid.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all, in our LAN we use a Samba server (version 2.2.9) on Linux (Debian Woody) to provide file services to workstations running (mostly) W2K. WinCVS is a GUI frontend to the popular CVS version control system. After the swap to and from daylight savings time WinCVS erroneously flags all files in cvs working directories on Samba shares as modified (because of the icon color WinCVS users refer to

Hey all, Like a lot of folks, I use rsync to pull content out to production web servers. Tastes great, less filling. Here's what I'd like to be able to do: Sometimes a web tree is not ready to sync, for whatever reason. I have many modules available, so stopping ryncd is not an option. I'd like to be able to tell rsync in daemon mode "this particular module is not available at

Attached please find unified diffs against Samba 2.0.6. I'm hoping that others will find it useful and that it may even find its way into Samba 2.0.7 This patch does two things: - Modifies the handling of the 'netbios name' parameter so that standard_sub_basic() is run on its value when the 'netbios name' parameter is processed. This has to be done this way because