Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Difference in behaviour with --backup"
2018 May 15
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Thank you Ravi for your fast answer. As requested you will find below the "stat" and "getfattr" of one of the files and its parent directory from all three nodes of my cluster.
NODE 1:
File: ?/data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey?
Size: 0 Blocks: 38 IO Block: 131072 regular
2018 May 17
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hi mabi,
Some questions:
-Did you by any chance change the cluster.quorum-type option from the
default values?
-Is filename.shareKey supposed to be any empty file? Looks like the file
was fallocated with the keep-size option but never written to. (On the 2
data bricks, stat output shows Size =0, but non zero Blocks and yet a
'regular empty file').
-Do you have some sort of a
2007 Dec 09
3
OT: Rsync question
Hello All,
I have an off topic question about rsync and was
wondering if i can get some kind person help with it.
I have two servers with each server have three same
directories on them /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ . How would i
achieve this by using rsync?
I have tried rsync -avrt --delete server_ip:/dir1/
/dir2/ /dir3/ /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/
this does not do anything except give errors.
Someone on IRC
2018 May 23
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hello,
I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do?
For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread?
Thanks,
Mabi
?
??????? Original Message ???????
On May 17, 2018 11:07 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote:
> ??
>
> Hi Ravi,
2018 May 23
1
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 05/23/2018 12:47 PM, mabi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do?
>
> For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread?
Sorry Mabi,? I haven't had a chance to dig deeper into this. The
workaround of
2018 May 17
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hi Ravi,
Please fine below the answers to your questions
1) I have never touched the cluster.quorum-type option. Currently it is set as following for this volume:
Option Value
------ -----
cluster.quorum-type none
2) The .shareKey
2010 Jul 16
4
--compare-dest weirdness
Hi All,
I am writing a backup program for my computer. brief outline is as follows.
Running ubuntu 10.04
2 main partitions, / and /home, both ext3. 1 external usb hdd, ext3,
mounted to /backups/main.
once every couple of days, rsync backs up, using following command,
everything worth backing up in / and /home partitions to a folder
/backups/main/Full. command: "rsync -vrhRupElog
2001 Nov 16
1
include/exclude directory question
I want to send a subset of directories sepcified in "include" arguments
to a client, but I am creating all the
peer and parent directories as well, although they are empty - here is
basically what I'm doing.
assuming I have /staging/upgrade/dir1, /staging/upgrade/dir2 and
/staging/upgrade/dir3 on the source tree.
--include "*/" -include upgrade/dir1/** -include
2005 Dec 20
4
rsync deleting symbolic link unexpectedly
I''m running 2.6.6 on a red hat EL3 system.
using the following command,
rsync -rlptDvzL --stats --include=a/ --include=a/dir/
--include=a/dir/symlink/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/
--include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/dir3/ --exclude=''**'' /export/stuff
remote::stuff
I expect the "symlink" (which is really a symbolic link to a directory)
to be preserved on the
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 05:09 PM, mabi wrote:
> Thanks Ravi for your answer.
>
> Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick?
>
> And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)?
Sorry I should have been clearer. Yes the brick on the 3rd node.
`setfattr -x trusted.afr.myvol-private-client-0
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Again thanks that worked and I have now no more unsynched files.
You mentioned that this bug has been fixed in 3.13, would it be possible to backport it to 3.12? I am asking because 3.13 is not a long-term release and as such I would not like to have to upgrade to 3.13.
??????? Original Message ???????
On April 9, 2018 1:46 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote:
> ??
2013 Dec 04
1
Query on make
Greetings,
I have created several scripts which needs to be packaged.
I have done my groundwork on rpmbuild
Let us say I have 4 directories with scripts in them
dir1, dir2, dir3 and dir4
I want to create different packages which will contain the compiled
code (err.. shc)
pack1: dir1,dir2
pack2: dir1,dir3
pack3: dir1,dir3
I want the resulting rpm packages will be residing elsewhere (perhaps
2009 Oct 06
1
Samba directory level security
Good morning all,
We are moving our web server from novell to unix (solaris) and will be using samba to allow users to edit web pages. Our samba instance authenticates using ADS and the users do not necessarily have accounts on the server itself. We are attempting to allow users to map a single samba share but only see the directories they have read access to (see configuration below). Any
2007 Nov 21
2
Access control question.
Hello,
I have a general administrative question concerning Samba shares.
I have a large amount of data that about 25 users have limited access to. I
only want these users to have access to a sub-set of this data, but I also
only want the users to see that which they have access to.
So, for example, suppose that the share looks like thus:
/smbshare
/smbshare/dir1
/smbshare/dir2
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Thanks Ravi for your answer.
Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick?
And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)?
??
??????? Original Message ???????
On April 9, 2018 1:24 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote:
> ??
>
> On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote:
>
> >
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below:
NODE1:
STAT:
File: ?/data/myvol-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/dir11/dir12_Archiv/azipfiledir.zip/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/problematicfile?
Size: 0 Blocks: 38
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote:
> As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below:
>
> NODE1:
>
> STAT:
> File:
2008 Apr 23
1
Using mkdir from rsync
Hi all,
When using rsync to copy a full directory path to another machine in
my network, like dir1/dir2/dir3/, mkdir fails because it have to
create dir1 and dir2 prior to dir3, non of the 3 directories exist in
the remote machine, so mkdir needs the -p option to do that, my
question is: is there any way i can tell mkdir use the -p option when
invoking from rsync?
--
Manuel Garcia
2018 Aug 21
2
[Bug 13587] New: Add a --dry-run way to show destination for each item
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13587
Bug ID: 13587
Summary: Add a --dry-run way to show destination for each item
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2009 Apr 22
2
purge-empty-dirs and max-file-size confusion
I want to use --min-size to copy just large files (and their necessary
parent directories), but everything I've tried copies *all* the source
directories, and creates them empty on the destination even if they
don't have any big files in them. I only want the minimal directory
hierarchies that contain the big files. This doesn't work:
$ rm -rf /tmp/foo
$ rsync -ai --min-size