similar to: Openssl and rsync

Martin, Thanks for your insights. I was able to create an openssl version of rsync for Windows and Linux. It did take more coding as you mentioned, but it seems quite stable and speedy. The reason for this undertaking was to create a version of rsync that could communicate with the Netware port, which doesn't use ssh because of a lack of a ssh on shipping versions. It also could be useful

Hello, I have ported rsync 2.5.5 to Netware and would like to, at least, contribute the binary so that people can download it. It says on the website to use the bug tracking system to do this, but since that isn't working, I thought I would try this. Thanks for any help or direction. Lee

One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of user quotas. Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system per user will not be manageable. I would agree that today that is the case however I personally don''t see this as an insurmountable problem. However the questions

I was just thinking how they could be easily supported. This would work, right? : imap stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login imaps stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login --ssl imap-login would try to connect to master process using some named socket. If it couldn't, it would create the master process itself. Master

Back in 2009 there was some discussion of the practicality of supporting char sizes greater than 8-bit: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-September/thread.html#6349 http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/thread.html#26025 with the consensus seemingly being "quite doable, please get a good patch and submit". However the current code appears (to my

My * is presently running fine on Mandrake 9.2, but Ive been entertaining moving to Mandrake 10.0 to enjoy the obvious improvement in kernal speed Im seeing on other 10.0 boxes Ive recently built for other applications. (10.0 is the first implementation of the 2.6 kernal) Any comments from anyone who's running on 10.0? IS anyone running * on Mandrake 10.0? If so, any issues stand out?

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it

I am wanting to rsync over mac files to a freebsd 4.5 box, but have recently found out that rsync does not preserve resource forks, or creator types and maybe some other things. But, has anybody had any experience like this, would tar'ing the files and then rsync'ing that seem a worthwhile solution. There's a lot, so testing is going slowly. Thanks! Brad Lynch Info Sys Coordinator

Hello Tom, Sorry, please but i again return to IFB question. If i correct understand in current situation IFB haven't profit from ESFQ in common cases (i mean internal networks masquarading) so as we wait from ESFQ allocates bandwidth fairly per source IP(internal) but IFB don't know internal IPs. If i correct, what do you think what can help IFB to solve its main disadvantage

Hello all, I'm new to the list, but have done quite a bit of researching before regarding the support of Mac OS X specific features (resource forks, extended attributes, ACLs, file creation & modification date). By reading the archives, I get the impression that the current version of rsync 3.0.0pre8 is quite far in this respect. At least it sounds so, and I thank the developers

Hello everybody, I''ve been using RSpec as a tool to create web applications for some time now, in Rails, and using plain Ruby with WEBrick as well. The tool suits my needs and the story runner is great. Now there are things that aren''t solvable on the web, you''ll need a _real_ desktop application for those problems. So I''ve toyed a bit around with various GUI

I have been using internal snapshots on production qcow2 images for a couple of years, admittedly as infrequently as possible with one exception and that exception has had multiple snapshots taken and removed using virt-manager's GUI. I was unaware of this: > There are some technical downsides to > internal snapshots IIUC, such as inability to free the space used by the > internal

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 2015, at 8:02 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > wrote: > > But it does look like we have a general issue here: Why is linux > special? If requiring a cmake that does't ship with a given system is > an issue at all, then we couldn't use any version of

I'm working on trying to get rsync 2.5.6pre1 available for people to test more widely. I'm out of time for today, and I'm stuck on a problem that some machines on build.samba.org are showing on the 'chgrp' test. I can reproduce this on my home redhat 7.3 system too. It appears to be a timing problem because when I do strace -F -f on it the problem goes away. Everything seems

Hi just now I had an apparently insurmountable problem that's been bugging me for days, but phrasing my question in a form suitable for the R-help list enabled me to solve my own problem in two minutes flat. thanks everyone. -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst Southampton Oceanography Centre European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK tel 023-8059-7743

On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Chris Rapier wrote: > Hi all, > > When a client requests dynamic remote forwarding with -R it delays forking > into the background. In ssh.c we see > > if (options.fork_after_authentication) { > if (options.exit_on_forward_failure && > options.num_remote_forwards > 0) { > debug("deferring postauth fork until

I'm not sure the idea that enabling pull requests will make it easier for new contributors is fully thought out. Just because more people might be familiar with GitHub, doesn't mean it is superior. I've found the workflow on Phabricator to be really easy. I think many people agree that Phabricator is really good, I don't think we would want to get rid of Phabricator and while its

Heya.. By reading my /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf, I can find out that my Apache is running as the user "www" and the group "www" .. Yet, when I run sockstat, it tells me one of the forks are runned as root and listening on port 80 as well as the other forks are runned by www:www.. If I got a lot of users connecting to my server on port 80, will thier requests ever be

Dear friends: I've been trying for some time to install my copy of Word97 (which I own, having purchased it directly from Microsoft with my own license number). I have tried the latest Wine 0.9.14. To do this, I first UNinstalled version 0. 9.1-4 (PCLINUXOS), then installed the new wine from source. The source install asked me to install a number of font files, which I did (bison,

On 21 Jul 2016, at 07:12, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I don't much care which of those is chosen. I have a slight preference for >> #1, for ease of doing things like grep/log/etc on llvm by itself, excluding >> all the other projects. But either way seems probably fine, and an >> improvement over multiple repositories.