similar to: more on my last message

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "more on my last message"

2003 Jan 27
2
small problem that I'm having...
Good morning guys, I've compiled and installed rsync 2.5.5 on 2 AIX 4.3 systems. When I try to run this command rsync --stats --progress --delete --partial --timeout=60 -aRntvz patrick@aix1::test /test I get this message and I don't know why. On both systems I run the command as root, what could be the cause ? Oh I was getting the same message with rsync 2.4.X and I still get it with the
2003 Jan 23
2
how to send only the diff ?
Hi, I'm trying to do so that rsync does not send a file that exists but is different on the remote. I want rsync to send only the difference to the remote. I prefer to send the difference of a 500 MB file than sending the whole file over. I use AIX and rsync version rsync version 2.4.5 protocol version 24 Oh and my command is : rsync --stats --progress --delete --partial --timeout=60
2000 Jun 14
4
need help with compiling openssh
hi, I'm trying to compile OpenSSH, latest version on my Linux box. I know that it requires openssl and I've installed the 0.9.5a and it's working just fine. Now when I'm trying to ./configure the openssh with the options ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/bin/openssh/ --without-pam --without-shadow --with-tcp-wrappers It's giving me checking for openssl directory... configure:
2002 May 22
2
Problem
Hello. I don't know if you can help me but I try. I have a collection of objects, we suppose that they are 1000. After some works that I made I divided this collection in some clusters. Suppose to have obtained 50 clusters. For each cluster I found a particular value called Precision, where 0<Precision<1. Taken the firs cluster I want to compare his Precision with the precision of his
2016 May 01
1
E-mail advice sought
On 01/05/16 13:23, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> I think this is my autism coming in to play, I think what is very clear >> to me I just am not able to adequately communicate because clearly >> people are not even remotely grasping what I am trying to convey. >> > > Basically whether it is a white list or a black list
2004 Nov 02
2
Matrix decomposition: orthogonal complement
Hello, How I can compute in R the orthogonal complement of one matrix? If A (n x m ) matrix of full column rank (n>m), its orthogonal complement is denoted by A_ . A_ is n X (n-m) matrix of full column rank and such that A'A_=0. I need to compute A_. How I can compute A_ in R? Best Regards, /Florin -- Florin G. Maican Ph.D. candidate, Department of Economics School of
2016 Jan 08
2
[PATCH] doc: specify that quantized LPC shift must be non-negative
Refs http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/424/ --- doc/html/format.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/html/format.html b/doc/html/format.html index 8598941..2ce82c2 100644 --- a/doc/html/format.html +++ b/doc/html/format.html @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ &lt;5&gt; </td> <td> - Quantized linear predictor coefficient shift needed
2016 May 01
0
E-mail advice sought
On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >>> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder >>>> <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>
2016 Jan 08
0
[PATCH] doc: specify that quantized LPC shift must be non-negative
Tristan Matthews wrote: > Refs http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/424/ > - Quantized linear predictor coefficient shift needed in bits (NOTE: this number is signed two's-complement). > + Quantized linear predictor coefficient shift needed in bits (NOTE: this number is signed two's-complement and must be non-negative). Maybe it's better to explain why? At least
2002 May 22
1
a more specific question about qda
Perhaps, I should complement my previous e-mail question: I am trying to select variables through a quadratic discriminant analysis. It seems to me that a robust criterion is the value of the discriminatory power (i.e. the ratio of the separation of the class means to within-class variance) How can I obtain this ratio from V & R's qda() output ? Thanks (I hope this question is relevant) --
2006 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting all BasicBlocks of a Function into new Function
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Bram Adams wrote: > One of the obstacles I face when trying to do the complement > (creating new Function and adding call to original in it), is to find > out how to pass the varargs argument of the new Function into the > call to the old Function. Will passing the sbyte** passed to > llvm.va_start do the trick? I think this is the better way to go. If
2006 Jan 03
1
need to know some basic functionality features of R-Proj
Hi, I am new-comer to statistics and R-Project. I would like to know if these features can be attained in R-Project.Please help. 1) beta 1 and Beta 2, or gamma one and gamma two for skewness and kurtosis, respectively, including standard errors and tests for significance (relative to values for a Gaussian distribution). 2) linear correlation 3) quadratic regression 4) polynomial regression
2023 Feb 15
1
[libnbd PATCH v3 13/29] socket activation: avoid manipulating the sign bit
F_SETFD takes an "int", so it stands to reason that FD_CLOEXEC expands to an "int". In turn, it's bad hygiene to manipulate the sign bit of (signed) integers with bit operations: ~FD_CLOEXEC Convert FD_CLOEXEC to "unsigned int" for the bitwise complement operator: ~(unsigned)FD_CLOEXEC The bitwise complement then results in an "unsigned int".
2008 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] Dependence Analysis [was: Flow-Sensitive AA]
On Aug 22, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > C has a way to express this: signed integers are defined to never > overflow, unsigned integers are defined to wrap gracefully on > overflow. And gcc has yet more fun in it: -fstrict-overflow Allow the compiler to assume strict signed overflow rules, depending on the language being compiled. For C
2018 May 03
2
[RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
On 2018?05?03? 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote: >>>> So how about we use the straightforward way then? >>> You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead >>> of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling >>> vring_need_event()? >>> >>> The problem is that, the second param (new_idx) of >>> vring_need_event() will be used for:
2018 May 03
2
[RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
On 2018?05?03? 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote: >>>> So how about we use the straightforward way then? >>> You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead >>> of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling >>> vring_need_event()? >>> >>> The problem is that, the second param (new_idx) of >>> vring_need_event() will be used for:
2020 Jun 17
2
FLAC specification clarification
Hi all, When trying to better understand the way LPC exactly works, I stumbled upon something which, after some digging, was already reported and (partly) fixed: https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/424/ Apparently, the FLAC specification has a LPC shift that can be both positive and negative, but the encoder specifically makes sure that only positive shifts are encoded and the decoder only
2013 Mar 11
1
Suggesed wiki edits: Documentation
http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation on your host, in this wiki, and and the larger web where you should look on your host, in this wiki, and on the larger web, where you should look a full complement of man and info pages. a full complement of manual and info pages. The pinfo documentation reader is available which may be installed via yum The pinfo documentation reader is available,
2008 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] sext..to instruction
Hi Le Anh, > how can it determinate, that the i16 value %x positive is (65535)? > And the second example: I guess you should read up on the "two's complement" format, which is how a signed value is stored in most architectures (and in these examples). In short, a sext operation takes the highest bit of the original number (the sign bit) and copies it into all the higher
2018 May 03
0
[RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:25:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?05?03? 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > > So how about we use the straightforward way then? > > > > You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead > > > > of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling > > > > vring_need_event()? > > > > > >