similar to: send_files failed to open filename ...

I got bit by this in LLVM 2.4 DagCombiner.cpp and it's still in trunk: SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSTORE(SDNode *N) { [...] // If this is a store of a bit convert, store the input value if the // resultant store does not need a higher alignment than the original. if (Value.getOpcode() == ISD::BIT_CONVERT && !ST->isTruncatingStore() && ST->isUnindexed()) {

I agree, that doesn't look right. It looks like this is what was intended: Index: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (revision 65000) +++ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (working copy) @@ -4903,9 +4903,9 @@ // resultant store does not need a higher alignment than

I'm running into lots of problems with this call back. Mostly the problem occurs because this callback is used before types are legalized. However, the code generator does not have a 1-1 correspondence between all LLVM types and the codegen types. This leads to problems when getSetCCResultType is passed in an invalid type, but has a valid LLVM type attached to it. An example is <3 x

Make sure you’re running LLVM with assertions enabled. You’ll get more information about what’s going wrong that way. That said, yes, this looks like a bug. Specifically, SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandConstantFP() assumes that f32 is the smallest floating point constant type it’ll need to handle, and that MVT enum ordering reflects that. while (SVT != MVT::f32) {

Here there is the dump: SelectionDAG.cpp:81: static bool llvm::ConstantFPSDNode::isValueValidForType(llvm::EVT, const llvm::APFloat &): Assertion `VT.isFloatingPoint() && "Can only convert between FP types"' failed. 0 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00007f7405022de5 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 37 1 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00007f74050232e3 2 libpthread.so.0

Hi Micah, I think that getSetCCResultType should only be called for legal types. Disabling it on isPow2VectorType is not the way to go because there are other illegal vector types which are pow-of-two. I suggest that you call it only after type-legalization. BTW, you can't set the LLVMTy yourself because you don't have access to the LLVMContext at that point. Nadav From:

if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC && (LegalOperations || (!LegalOperations && VT.isPow2VectorType()))) But the comment right after it is: // sext(setcc) -> sext_in_reg(vsetcc) for vectors. // Only do this before legalize for now. if (VT.isVector() && !LegalOperations) { So, these optimizations are never safe in the general case if we can't

Hi, ABCRegister.td : def SGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [i32], 16, (add S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15 )>; def SFGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [f32], 16, (add S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15 )>; ===== Instruction selection ends: ... t8: i32 = ADDrr t37, t32

We no longer have vsetcc, so the comment is wrong. The code looks incorrect. The fact that a vector is power-of-two does not guarantee anything about its legality. For example <128 x i64> would pass the condition in the code below, and die on most targets. From: Villmow, Micah [mailto:Micah.Villmow at amd.com] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 22:33 To: Rotem, Nadav; Developers Mailing List

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 21:43, Dan Gohman wrote: > I agree, that doesn't look right. It looks like this > is what was intended: > > Index: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp > =================================================================== > --- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (revision 65000) > +++ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

Hello. I'm new to R and I'm trying to solve a classification problem. I have a training dataset of about 40,000 rows and 50 columns. When I try to train support vector machine, it gives me this error after a few seconds: Error in predict.svm(ret, xhold) : Model is empty! This is the code I use: ne_span_data <- as.matrix(read.table('ne_span.data.R.txt', header=TRUE,

Hi all, A few things. Firstly, I've got a working implementation of the X86ThisCall calling convention, but I'm unsure how to go about submitting it. (I'm not really sure how to go about creating patch files etc, but would like to contribute to the project). Also, I'm using MS Visual C++ Express, and there are a few things that stop llvm1.9 (and the current CVS release) from

Hi, if I write the following simple program: target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" define void @foo () { %1 = alloca half store half 0xH42CC, half* %1 ; 0xH42CC = 3.4 %2 = load half* %1

Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent

Dear R-help I am wondering if somebody wrote some code to convert an adjacency list model into a nested set model. In principal I want to do the same as John Celko mentioned it here with SQL: http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&selm=8j0n05%24n31%241 %40nnrp1.deja.com Assume you have a tree structure like this Albert / \ /

Dear All, I have imported an HTML document to R (called tables) and wish to select certain pieces of it for processing. The first few lines of the object appear as follows: > tables [[1]] <table id="fs-table" class="gf-table rgt"> <thead> <tr><th class="lm lft nwp"> In Millions of USD (except for per share items) </th> <th

I moved from acts_as_tree to acts_as_nested_set because I need the all_children method. I''ve seen an alternative way to add this method to acts_as_tree here: http://www.chuckvose.com/articles/2006/05/24/recursive-children But I''d prefer to use the more efficient way of acts_as_nested_set (and not to have to revert to my old code). Anyway, here''s my issue: if I

Hi, I''m trying to get act_as_nested_set working, and I''m puzzled. I googled the following http://codefetch.com/cache?url=http://media.pragprog.com/titles/rails/code/r ails-code.tgz <http://codefetch.com/cache?url=http://media.pragprog.com/titles/rails/code/ rails-code.tgz&path=rails-code/ar/acts_as_nested_set.rb&lang=ruby&qy=ruby>

Hello, I installed OpenSSH_3.7p1 on 2 AIX 4.3.3 servers last week and had this problem on both of them. On the first server I finally re-installed the package and that fixed it. I tried re-installing it multiple times on the second server and still have the same issue. I have checked everything that I can think of and spent many hours looking for a solution. Both servers have the same csh.cshrc

Is it possible to put conditions relative to the current instance in has_many''s :conditions? For example, in a forum app: class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :topic has_many :self_and_descendants, :class_name => "Post", :order => "lft", :conditions => "topic_id = #{topic_id} AND (lft BETWEEN #{lft} AND #{rgt})" end With the