similar to: [patch] Recent IPv6 changes in rsync/access.c

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: > > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August > > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there > > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for > >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Bug ID: 1071 Summary: nftables: set does not work within inet table with option flags interval Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

4.0p1 and 4.2p1 are affected for me, I'm using Linux based around a FC2 build (~2 years old). I'm trying to login with password authentication from psftp.exe (part of PuTTY) but it. Maybe this bug isn't with OpenSSH itself but a supporting library, I would appreciate your assistance in tracking down the problem. I have tried getting a 'core' file out of SSH with

I am running rsync over a VPN. The connection has been stable for some time, but recently it has started failing. I am including the strace of the failure below. Basically, the client disconnects typically with an error 12. I have 3 other clients using the same openvpn/rsync configuration, and those are stable, so I am fairly confident this is something on this particular link. The

On 07/29/2015 01:45 AM, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a > different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. > > Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and > 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM

Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1491 Summary: no field sin6_scope_id on AIX 4.3.3 Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950 Bug #: 1950 Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi, I am trying to get ipv6 firewall running. I did a very simple ip6tables rules and noticed very long running yum updates. I think that happened because firewall is dropping outgoing packets to port 80. Well, I thought to mitigate the issue and changed outgoing from drop to reject. Now I try manually # strace telnet 2a02:180:ffff:1::551f:b966 80 ... connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Summary: ut_addr_v6 not used Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/167867 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

Here's the details and some debugging I did for starters, but I have no idea where to proceed from here. Help please? Command to reproduce should be in the strace output below. -Dan P.S. Sorry for sending this a few times; I think only one will make it through to the list since I wasn't subscribed initially. $ rsync --version rsync version 3.1.0 protocol version 31 Copyright (C)

Hello, I'm using an rsync server on a Linux packages repository (deb packages) to sync all mirrors. The mirrors sync every 10 minutes. Most of the time, there is nothing to sync, except a timestamp file, so the sync is pretty fast. Anyway, after it has been working well for some time (between 2 and 24hours), the rsync daemon crashes. It is still running but seems to retry something

--- .../reflection/nbdkit-reflection-plugin.pod | 23 ++++- plugins/reflection/reflection.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/Makefile.am | 2 + tests/test-reflection-address.sh | 63 +++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/reflection/nbdkit-reflection-plugin.pod

Hi all. I'm just reporting some strange (fatal) behaviour when running rsync --daemon on an IPv6-enabled box. It gets a fatal error when trying to bind to the same address twice. strace output: bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(873), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = 0 bind(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(873),

Guys, I'm facing this problem too: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-March/172230.html I have two Samba4 AC DC, in both located in my office, dual-stacked, working like a charm. Now, I need to deploy a third DC, located within Amazon EC2, which does NOT have IPv6. But, samba-tool fails to join. How can I workaround this, without enabling a tunneled IPv6 within my EC2 ?

Hai, Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 ) Can you check that. I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4. As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5 I think you have forgotten something. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman > via samba

Hi list, I just tried to add a second DC to an existing Samba4 domain using samba-tool (both hosts run latest samba4 git version). But the join failed, complaining about being unable to find a writeable DC: root at elektron:~# /opt/samba4/bin/samba-tool domain join linex.r00t.la DC Finding a writeable DC for domain 'linex.r00t.la' ERROR(exception): uncaught exception - Failed to find a

According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least version 3.5: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870 However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian Jessie. On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6 disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6 connect fails immediately before the v4

Hey guys! To make the adoption of IPv6 networks with Samba4 more smooth / robust, I think that it is vital to give to Samba4, the ability for it, to join a IPv4-Only Secondary DC, into a Dual-Stacked Primary DC. This doesn't work today. Otherwise, these days to enable IPv6 within a "Samba4 AC DC" network, it is a requirement to enable it, simultaneously, on each and every network

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: > > for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { > NTSTATUS status; > > status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, > NULL, /* local_addr */