Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "rsync protocol description"
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written,
could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's
response for the state of rsync,
2003 May 10
3
benchmarking rsync's -z compression utility
Hi,
Is there a way in which rsync's -z compression (zlib) utility can be
benchmarked?
I'm trying to compare the compression ratio between rsync and external
compression tools like gzip and bzip2.
Are there any advantages to using rsync's internal compression mechanism
specified with the -z option compared to solely applying external
compression i.e. bzip2 to the files and invoking
2002 Aug 05
1
rsync for PDAs?
I've been working for the past few months with open-source solutions for
syncing Palm PDAs (Coldsync, mostly). I've been becoming increasingly
annoyed with Palm's Desktop Link Protocol and the sync mechanism, and am
considering replacing it with a third-party application for the Palm. Since
I've had good luck with rsync in the past, its seemed an obvious choice.
I've
2003 Jul 20
2
Rolling Checksum Algorithms
Hi,
Where can I get good pointers on the rolling checksum algorithm used in rsync?
I need an 8-bit or 12-bit rolling checksum too. Any place where "rolling"
checksum algorithms are discussed?
Seun Osewa
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
2002 Jun 21
2
Release 3 of "rzync" new-protocol test
For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic]
test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might
not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based
on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page:
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html
Here's the tar file of the new
2003 May 08
5
MD4 bug-fix for protocol version 27
Hi,
while implementing the rsync protocol in one of our projects I found
that the current CVS version still has a MD4 bug. I'm using the FreeBSD
libmd implementation and I still had checksum mismatches with protocol
version 27 for files whose size was a multiple of 64 - 4 ( - 4 due to
checksum_seed). A patch for todays CVS version is attached.
Someone should also review the clean_fname()
2002 Nov 25
3
FTP at rsync.samba.org down?
Hello,
just being fascinated by rsync I wanted to look at the distribution files
at ftp://rsync.samba.org, but it was not possible to get a ftp connection
to that address. Is the ftp service down there?
Thanks in advance for any soon helpful hint.
Have a nice day
Michael
--
Michael Schmidt mschmidt@fh-koblenz.de
MIRROR OF
Ghostscript * X-Windows X11
2002 Jul 18
4
rsync anti-FUD
I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from
the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a
worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD.
Are there any documented, corportate users of rsync? Testimonials? In
short, how do I drag this risk-averse group out of the FTP age into the
rsync present?
/p
2005 Jul 28
1
Need help with the rsync library and the communication protocol
Hey,
I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static
version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it
is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we
need a version implemented in C.
So I started implementing it. But the rsync source isn't beautiful or structured
- it's just a big hunk of code. I spent
2002 Apr 24
1
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote:
> Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of
> activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make
> a new release?
I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months,
because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync
2002 Nov 06
4
offline rsync
hello, I'm new to this list.
here is my question:
I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job
one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are
quite slow and expensive (in Italy).
I though I could produce the "signature" of files on home computer, store
it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or
altered files on
2005 Jul 05
2
rsync lib
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/39 - Release Date: 2005-07-04
2002 Mar 29
4
Incremental backups and batch mode.
I'm trying to use the rsync algorithm for incremental backups.
After a quick look at rsync I saw the batch mode operations,
and I thought that maybe I can modify them for incremental backups.
What is needed is to add an option to save the checksums of all
the files of the level 0 backup and a second option to use the level n
checksum to calculate the delta batch files for the level n+1
2009 Jul 15
1
What happened to librsync?
Hi.
It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything
similar for rsync 3.x.x?
Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x
source independantly?
The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta,
and it's still beta for v3.x
Thanks,
Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2003 Jun 12
1
questions about librsync
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding
librsync, but couldn't find any others.
I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc
servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make
check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this
might be? Might I need a specific
2009 Apr 21
2
looking for superlifter souce code and related information
Dear List,
I just googled "superlifter" and found below link, but I can't get any
source code.
http://superlifter.sourceforge.net/
Any help or info on this is mostly appreciated. And sorry for the
trouble, if it's NOT allowed to post here. THanks.
--
Daniel
2002 Jul 21
5
superlifter design notes (OpenVMS perspective)
> Qualities
>
> 1. Be reasonably portable: at least in principle, it should be
> possible to port to Windows, OS X, and various Unixes without major
> changes.
In general, I would like to see OpenVMS in that list.
> Principles
>
> 1. Clean design rather than micro-optimization.
A clean design allows optimization to be done by the compiler, and tight
optimization
2002 Jul 31
2
new rsync release needed soon?
On the subject of needed patches, I just recently completed a patch for
librsync that fixed the mdfour code to have uint_64 or 2 uint_32's for
size. Without this, the checksums on files >512Megs are incorrect. The
code should drop into rsync without a hitch. The same goes for mdfour in
samba, becuase that is where librsync got the code from anyway.
Robert Weber
University of
2003 May 12
4
xdelta files for security patches
Has xdelta (in ports under misc/xdelta) ever been considered as a means of
delivering binary patches for security updates?
It seems to be a pretty neat.
--
Regards,
Michael Nottebrock
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url :
2006 Feb 22
2
[librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote:
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4.
Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was