similar to: per sync size limit

Hi Heikki, So libao is currently not maintained upstream. In the appropriate IRC channels I'm lead to believe that there are better libraries out there that should be used instead. If so many debian packages didn't link against it I would seriously consider dropping it all together. It doesn't sound like it's worth anyone's time maintaining libao properly upstream. I do have

I compiled and tried rsync 2.5.0 but could not get the server running. loadparm.c:string_set() now calls free() which it did not do in 2.4.6 and this free() tries to free memory that was not allocated with malloc. Here is a gdb run (done after adding return before fork() in become_daemon) which shows where it crashes and what my minimal config file for demonstrating the bug was. The config file

The code itself makes sense, but I want to know if this breaks any guarantee made about preserving a Value* in the MachineMemOperand. It sounds like we're having the same issue. We were using the Value* stored in the MachineMemOperand to get address space information during assembly printing. The alternative is carrying around a lot of extra (redundant) information in the SDAG. If it is

On 1 Oct 2010, at 13:35, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>> >>>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>>

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>> >>>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>> >>>>> I've

On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: >> >>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>> >>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>> >>>> I've defined comparison >>>> >>>> def

On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Our architecture(TCE) can have LOTS of registers. > > It seems r152019 changed some register bookkeeping data structures to > 8-bit. This broke support for architectures with >255 registers. > > Please revert this change or make those register-related values at least > 16 bits wide. I agree. We can limit the number

On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >> >> I've defined comparison >> >> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>;

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >> >>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>> >>> I've defined comparison >>> >>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set

Dear Sir There is a acces violation erron (Null pointer) when I have done this. This is repetable but not inmutable. 0. I have put the command "library("Rcmdr")" in the .Rprofile 1. Start R, load module Rcmdr, Input a dataset in RCommander, then save the workspace. I can do any analysis now, no crashes, everything works file but when: 2. I start abain R. It comes up with

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Hella Heikki <Heikki.Hella at bof.fi> Subject: R code and robust regression Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:12:14 +0200 Size: 2187 Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20001212/c3361c7d/attachment-0001.mht

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 29 September 2011 13:54, Justin Holewinski > <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > Did you try to re-run configure after pulling that commit? > > I just tried a shared build with: > > ../configure --enable-optimized --enable-assertions > > --enable-targets=host,ptx

I find it slightly surprising, that ifelse(TRUE, character(0), "") returns NA instead of character(0). [WNT 2.6.2 Patched] -- Heikki Kaskelma

The problem shows in the following log snippet. The numeric address of the peer (localhost in this case) is garbage. rsyncd[32671]: reverse name lookup failed rsyncd[32671]: rsync: forward name lookup for failed: Name or service not known rsyncd[32671]: rsync on debian/ from UNKNOWN (::10fa:ffbf:a426:608%5) rsyncd[32671]: wrote 616 bytes read 70 bytes total size 143069 I am using linux

It seems some optimization pass converts some address computation add's into or's when it knows it's allowed due correct alignment. How do I turn this off keep the address calculations as adds?

On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. > > I've defined comparison > > > def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; > > > > > But then I end up having the following bug: > >

Hi all, I have just re-joined the list. I have been using Rsync on my Linux servers for a number of years now without fault. I now have the need to Rsync data between two Solaris 2.7 servers. This has got me stumped... Hoping that someone might have a quick answer for me? bash-2.03$ rsync -auvvvz sydney:/sun /sun opening connection using remsh sydney rsync --server --sender -vvvulogDtprz . /sun

Hi Heikki, > just using [(set V2I32Regs:$result, (sextloadv2i8 ADDRrr:$address))] > > gives me error that extloav2i8 is not defined. I don't have a target to test this on, but looking at include/llvm/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td, there is an "sextloadvi8" PatFrag, at least. I'd suggest a pattern along the lines of: (set V2I32Regs:$result, (v2i32 (sextloadvi8

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > > The one thing i really would have liked to have seen in a version bump > > would have been changing the default remote shell to ssh instead of > > rsh/remsh. > > I can see this being both a good thing (since I think it is a better >

I'm trying to rync working between the UK (Sun box) and India (AIX box) and am having a real problems getting it up and running because every time I do a full transfer it hangs. The Sun box is the one holding the canonical source which we want to mirror. I've been shipped to the India office to get this working and have tried hundreds of things over the last week, I've also scoured