similar to: Rsync 2.5.5 (Digital Unix 4.0f) Large Filesets...

Hello, I need an advice about POP3 and NFS with Dovecot 1.0 (as 1.1 is still tagged beta) . I currently have all messages and indexes under a NFS partition . I thus turned cache off using actimeo=0 . Of course, my current architecture does not allow me to keep the same user on the same dovecot server. Now, I have some NFS issues with high percentages of getattr() . If I understood well, the

Hi, I posted a list of problems I was having with rsync 2.5.5 (on Digital Unix 4.0f) which I've now been able to address thanks to some kernel tuning but I still have one outstanding problem - I still have situation where files which are added to the filelist for updating on the remote end are deleted by the client systems' web software before they are sent - at least I believe this is

I am just looking for a quick answer as to whether or not OpennSSH is compatible with Digital Unix Tru64 v 4.0F. Hing Fei Wong Systems Engineer Building 100, M1309 Valley Forge, PA Admin # 4-6242 -----Original Message----- From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 3:53 AM To: Wong, Hing Fei Cc: www at openbsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH compatibility with

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940 Summary: xmmap.c noequality compile error on DigitalUNIX 4.0F PK7 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940 anenni at isisw.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|xmmap.c noequality compile |xmmap.c noequality compile |error on DigitalUNIX 4.0F |error on Digital UNIX 4.0F |PK7

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1104 Summary: Compile error "ldLL" not declared in strtonum.c under Tru64 Unix 4.0f Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Build system

Dear friends, I failed to buld samba 3.0.30 for tru64unix 4.0F. I am curently locked to this os version due to other production software. We currently run Samba 2.2.8a but we were requested to upgrade by our network group. I downloaded 3.3.30 and did $ cd source $ ./configure no warnings or errors as far as I could see, except checking for replacing readdir using getdirentries()...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1386 Summary: OpenSSH 4.7p1 compile error in atomicio.c under Tru64 4.0f Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: Tru64 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build

When I run configure on either a DU server running 4.0f or a DU client running 4.0d, I receive the following error: ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Most directories are mounted using nfs v2 or nfs v3. rpc.lockd and rpc.statd are running on servers and clients. The rpcinfo -p command shows nlockmgr and llockmgr

contains version number 2.5.4 and it should be 2.5.5 .. -- Eero

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

Hello all, I've found some behavior in 2.5.5 that is contrary to the documentation in the man page. Specifically, I'm running an rsync server (i.e. from inetd with --daemon),and in the module definition I'm specifying the line "exclude nosyncdir". The documentation for rsyncd.conf indicates that this is exactly equivalent to using "--exclude nosyncdir" on the

Hello rsync-2.5.5 for hp-ux 11.0 is not syncing files more that 2 GB ( largefile ) . Should i need to recompile rsync ? Should i use any special options while compiling ? please help. -babu __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE,

Hi, Can anyone tell me please where I can get the latest version of rsync for AIX ? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

>Is there more than one rsync running? In 2.5.4 a failure in another rsync >process could kill your rsync. I haven't studied the code recently, but I >don't think there are any calls to fork() after it has started transfering >files. I recall bash$ ps -aux showed 2 rsync processes, maybe three when the rsync was executing on the other console. I have plenty more

Hello, I made a collection of GNUs to RS6k AIX-4.3.3, but rsync refuses to work between hosts, i get: rsync: failed to connect to X.X.X.X: Addr family not supported by protocol rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(97) Details: libc.a (original), gcc 3.1.1, binutils 2.13, make 3.79.1, /etc/services: rsync 873/tcp # RSync rsync

And, I've found more. It turns out that even though the exclude directive is ignored for inbound data in rsyncd.conf, it is NOT ignored for the --delete option. I've seen this behavior occur when I've deleted a file from the sending side (client) that is inside a tree that's matched by the server-side (rsyncd) exclude directive. The deletion is ignored, as the documenation

I've been through the archive and found nothing definitive on this. However, I am definitely seeing rsync hanging. I'm rsyncing from a Solaris 2.8 box running rsync 2.5.5 protocol version 26 and SSH version 2.1.0 (non-commercial version) to a Linux RedHat box running rsync 2.5.5 protocol version 26 and SSH version OpenSSH_3.1p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090603f. Wondering if

Hi there, I've a problem with rsync - see below. (by the way: I'm using rsync since 2 years now, good work!) my environment: - linux, 2.4, Dual-PIII-1.2GHz, 1 GB RAM. more of these machines. - rsync 2.5.5 - openssh 3.3 the machines are on a lan, so bandwith is not a problem. I sync large directories (about 6 GB growing) between the machines, no problem - memory consumtion of rsync is

Please ignore that email. I just realized my error - missing the all important = on the line. DUH. *shakes head* Sorry folks. Scott