similar to: RFC: configure option to disable daemon mode

Having built rsync 2.5.5 on IRIX 6.2 with gcc 3.1, I ran into two failures when running the testsuite with make check: both the chgrp and hardlinks tests fail: The failure in the chgrp test occurs here: + rsync -rtgvvv /amnt/callisto/volumes/obj-irix5/local/obj.irix5/rsync-2.5.5/testtmp.chgrp/from/ /amnt/callisto/volumes/obj-irix5/local/obj.irix5/rsync-2.5.5/testtmp.chgrp/to/ rsync: opendir

We recently had a strange NFS performance anomaly between a V880 running snv_124 and two NetApp filers. To investigate, a DTrace NFSv4 (and eventually NFSv3) client provider would been extremely helpful. Unfortunately, all I could find were a request for code review of a v3 client provider and another request for help developing a v4 provider. Nothing seems to have come from those initiatives,

Hi Hans, > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Rainer Orth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> > It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat >> > unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been >> > tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1. >> > >> > Source code

Author: sjelinek Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e2d8706d226b8bdada8284689c37d35a33396b15 Log message: 6409257 /etc/vfstab isn''t properly aligned 6409251 typo in stmsboot 6409254 unused variables in svc-syseventd 6409228 typo in aclutils.h Contributed by Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>. Files: update: usr/src/cmd/initpkg/vfstab.sh update:

I''m still trying to find a fix/workaround for the problem described in Unable to mount root pool dataset http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=492460 Since the Blade 1500''s rpool is mirrored, I''ve decided to detach the second half of the mirror, relabel the disk, create an alternative rpool (rpool2) there, copy the current BE (snv_134) using beadm

Hi! I want o calc the norm of a complex number ( |c| where c is complex). Does the function abs() this ? Thanks, -- Frank G. Zoellner AG Angewandte Informatik Technische Fakult"at Universit"at Bielefeld phone: +49(0)521-106-2951 fax: +49(0)521-106-2992 email: fzoellne at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 10 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#10.0.0 This release is the result of the LLVM community's work over the past six months (up to to e26a78e7085 on master plus commits up to d32170dbd5b on the release/10.x branch). Some highlights include: - C++ Concepts support in Clang - Clang no longer runs in a separate process

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 10 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#10.0.0 This release is the result of the LLVM community's work over the past six months (up to to e26a78e7085 on master plus commits up to d32170dbd5b on the release/10.x branch). Some highlights include: - C++ Concepts support in Clang - Clang no longer runs in a separate process

Hi! I am using R 1.8.1 and the svm of the e1071 package for classification. The problem is that I have unbalanced classes e.g. the first one is much bigger than the second one and therfore the svm is biased to the first class. If I manually adjust the class size the bias disappears. The question is then how to include this unequal class distribution to the svm (e.g. via wheights or costs)?

Hi! I am using the fft() function the base package to transform some 1d signal. If I use this standar fucntion I get a very huge first fourier coeficient. I think this dues to the handling of the borders of the signal. Usually in fft especially in image processing the signal is simulated to be continuous by adding the signal several times periodically. My question is, is there some function

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 11 is now finally available. Get it here: https://releases.llvm.org/download.html#11.0.0 This release is the result of the LLVM community's efforts over the past six months (up to 2e10b7a3 on trunk plus commits up to 176249bd on the release/11.x branch). One highlight is that the Flang Fortran frontend is now part of the release. And as usual, there are

I am pleased to announce that LLVM 11 is now finally available. Get it here: https://releases.llvm.org/download.html#11.0.0 This release is the result of the LLVM community's efforts over the past six months (up to 2e10b7a3 on trunk plus commits up to 176249bd on the release/11.x branch). One highlight is that the Flang Fortran frontend is now part of the release. And as usual, there are

Hi! I have a problem using the legend command. I typed as follows: plot(foo bar...) legend(0.6,10, c("True Positiv", "False Positive", "False Negative","True Negative"), col = c("black",2,3,4),lty=c(1,1,1,1),pch=c(0,0,0,0), merge = TRUE, bg='gray90') The plot and its legend is displayed ok. The I apply a dev.cop2eps on it to save the

Feb 12 CVS (sort of, see warning below) I've had to change around some of the code in configure.in to get some platforms to compile with the --with-tcp-wrappers option. Basicly I have set it up to check headers check system libraries check for optional packages check functions I have also tried to clean up the library order as it is important on some platforms. This patch works on Solaris

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Orth" <alan.orth at gmail.com> > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:37:40 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] parallel-readdir is not recognized in GlusterFS 3.12.4 > > Thank you,

Thank you, Raghavendra. I guess this cosmetic fix will be in 3.12.6? I'm also looking forward to seeing stability fixes to parallel-readdir and or readdir-ahead in 3.12.x. :) Cheers, On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:26 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at

Dear Vlad, I'm sorry, I don't want to test this again on my system just yet! It caused too much instability for my users and I don't have enough resources for a development environment. The only other variables that changed before the crashes was the group metadata-cache[0], which I enabled the same day as the parallel-readdir and readdir-ahead options: $ gluster volume set homes

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > To: "Alan Orth" <alan.orth at gmail.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:31:30 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] parallel-readdir is not recognized in GlusterFS 3.12.4 > > Adding

On 12/06/19 1:38 PM, Alan Orth wrote: > Dear Ravi, > > Thanks for the confirmation?I replaced a brick in a volume last night > and by the morning I see that Gluster has replicated data there, > though I don't have any indication of its progress. The `gluster v > heal volume info` and `gluster v heal volume info split-brain` are all > looking good so I guess that's

can you please test parallel-readdir or readdir-ahead gives disconnects? so we know which to disable parallel-readdir doing magic ran on pdf from last year https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf -v On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Alan Orth <alan.orth at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, on a slightly related note, I'm pretty