similar to: FW: RSYNC Performance on

Gouri: close. Try "Ssh-keygen -p -P ''". You might argue that ssh should guess that -P imlplies -p, but that's an issue for your ssh maintainer. Also: you don't ordinarily distribute the private key. You need the PUBLIC key in $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys on any system you want to access with the private key. Maybe i'm seing your application backward, and you

First, an item to fix: the substitution of "-P" for "-p". All good operating systems are case-sensitive, and many utilities, ssh included, are case sensitive about their options. "-P" is passed along with the "-p" to signal that the next parameter is the passphrase, to enable passphrase setting directly in the commandline. If that's wrong,

Hi, After creating and distributing the private key with "ssh-keygen -P", I am till getting the following error message while I schedule from cron. Only exception is right now , I have only one message which says "You have no controlling tty and no DISPLAY. Cannot read passphrase". Any help is appreciated. Gs You have no controlling tty and no DISPLAY. Cannot read

Hi, I have tried to genertae the key with ssh-keygen -P ( remove the passphrase) And copied it to the traget system. However, it doesn't work. Any insite with the way I am distributing the script. Gs -----Original Message----- From: Martin Pool [mailto:mbp@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:53 PM To: Kar, Gouri X. -ND Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org; Johnson, Gary X. -ND; Minyard, Mark X.

Hi, I have tried to generate the key with ssh-keygen -P ( remove the passphrase) and copied it to the target system. However, it doesn't work. Any insite with the way I am distributing the KEYS -----Original Message----- From: Martin Pool [mailto:mbp@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:53 PM To: Kar, Gouri X. -ND Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org; Johnson, Gary X. -ND; Minyard, Mark X. -ND

(Gouri: a more descriptive subject line will help you get repsonses in future, and please send your mail to rsync@lists.samba.org. Read <http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>) On 23 Jul 2002, "Kar, Gouri X. -ND" <Gouri.X.Kar.-ND@disney.com> wrote: > Hi guys, I am trying to schdule a script which makes call to RSYNC over SSH. > The same script works

I want to choose one codec between iLBC and Speex,because the codec is run on the embedded system,so the performance is the key factor to be encode and decode to be a real system. so ,i like to ask which codec is better in perfomance on the same hardware system? thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hi. i was migrated an old woody samba server to a new lenny samba virtualized server. That server is a PDC with random profiles and file server. Some users are reporting me bad performance in the app shared (all developed on MS-ACCESS). the memory and cpu reports in the domU show all fine, but i have some doubts in the disk performance. The dom0 is a Dell PowerEdge T610 (2 cpu Intel Xeon, 8GB

I've got some of our busiest users now using Dovecot instead of UW-IMAP with mbox-format mailboxes and predominantly Outlook Express as the client. Doing some perfomance monitoring (with Solaris 8 process accounting), it looks like Dovecot needing to read only 30-50% of the disk blocks needed by UW-IMAP, but I was hoping for better! What seems to happen, is that most of the connections

Upgraded recently from 3.8.15 to 3.10.5 and have seen a fairly substantial drop in read/write perfomance env: - 3 node, replica 3 cluster - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb - was able to down the volume for the upgrade and reboot each node - Usage: VM Hosting (qemu) - Sharded Volume - sequential read performance in VM's has dropped from 700Mbps to 300mbs - Seq Write

Slowdown by "[ELF] - Early continue in InputSectionBase<ELFT>::relocate(). NFC.?" looks wierd for me. I do not see any reasons for any impact on perfomance by this change. Good news is that since it was NFC it can easily be reverted. But I think slowdown in results is unrelative with that change and reverting will not give us 2-3% boost back. Best regards, George.

Could you disable cluster.eager-lock and try again? -Krutika On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > Upgraded recently from 3.8.15 to 3.10.5 and have seen a fairly substantial > drop in read/write perfomance > > env: > > - 3 node, replica 3 cluster > > - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb >

We have host-machine running Debian 6 (kernel 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 ) with Xen 4.0 on it there is mdadm-raid 10 and LVM on top of it that are use by Xen virtual machine On host system disk write speed test with dd shows 86,7 MB/s On Xen we have virutual machine with Win2008R2 PV drivers are installed So on this Win2008R2-system disk write speed test (performed with hdtune) shows 4 MB/s And in short

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 March 2016 at 01:34, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > Slowdown by "[ELF] - Early continue in > InputSectionBase<ELFT>::relocate(). > > NFC." looks wierd for me. I do not see any reasons for any impact on > > perfomance by this

Hi, I observed following behaviour. When I'm writing big (200MB+) files to samba share from Windows XP then writing speed is slow. Reading of these files (written from Windows XP) is very slow too. I found that it is caused by framgentation of this file [observed by using debuge2fs]. I tried to figure out what causes this framemtation and it seems that Windows XP is trying to do some

Hi there, though I am not a newbie in SAMBA issues I wonder if someone could give me some advice: I set up a SAMBA server to authenticate against an NT-PDC. The number of clients is appr. 500. SAMBA is running on Solaris2.6 on a SUN Ultra250 (no perfomance problems on that side, I guess :-) ) The problem is, that I ?ve got far too much open sockets connected to the PDC even minutes after the

I have at home two centos boxes: Box A - centos 6.4. gui version Box B - centos 7.1. minimal version. They are connected to 100Mb router (both boxes have 100Mb network adapters). Box B has software raid 1 and sata II interfaces.?On box B samba4 is installed and I copy files to samba share ( from box A to box B). Network monitor (iptraf-ng) shows only 20000 kbps of this copying operation. That is

The problem described in the subject appears NOT to be the case. It's not that simultaneous reads and writes dramatically decrease perf, but that the type of /writes/ being done by this app (bedtools) kills performance. If this was a self-writ app or an infrequently used one, I wouldn't bother writing this up, but bedtools is a fairly popular genomics app and since many installations use

Hi, My question is. What are your performance experiences compared to languages such as PHP, PERL and ASP? Could you build a site as big as Ebay on rails and have it perform fast enough? I''m afraid that the generalisation in components I see so much users asking for will make the framework too heavy compared to a clean programmed for perfomance PHP application. Probably even

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in