similar to: 2nd release of my new-protocol testing app

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "2nd release of my new-protocol testing app"

2002 Jun 21
2
Release 3 of "rzync" new-protocol test
For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic] test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html Here's the tar file of the new
2002 Jul 13
0
rZync 0.08 released
I've released the next version of my rZync test app. You can find a link to it here: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html You should also snag the referenced librsync source, as some important bugfixes in librsync are needed to compile rzync. For those that don't know, rZync is my new-protocol test app that I'm using to try out some ideas on how to improve the rsync
2002 Jun 26
2
Latest rZync release: 0.06
For the small number of people who are checking this out, I released version 0.05 a couple days ago (and only mentioned it on my new-protocol web page) followed today by 0.06. Some highlights of the two releases: - We handle symlinks now in our recursive synchronization mode. - Directory scanning is no longer limited to one active directory at a time (which was sorely needed when all the
2009 Feb 27
1
rsync --files-from
Hi, I am working on a replication tool for lustre filesystems. We have introduced a mechanism for getting the changes that have been made to a lustre filesystem - similar to inotify. We call this mechanism, changelogs. For performing replication, we open the source file using its 'file identifier' or FID (think of it an inode that is unique cluster wide) instead of its path. The file is
2009 Jul 15
1
What happened to librsync?
Hi. It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything similar for rsync 3.x.x? Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x source independantly? The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta, and it's still beta for v3.x Thanks, Sam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2005 Jul 28
1
Need help with the rsync library and the communication protocol
Hey, I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we need a version implemented in C. So I started implementing it. But the rsync source isn't beautiful or structured - it's just a big hunk of code. I spent
2002 Jun 01
0
Testing a transfer-only rsync tool
I found some time in the past week to work on a simple test app that would hopefully help to answer a few questions that came up recently: 1. Can a single-process generator+receiver work well? (Looks good so far, but I haven't run any multi-processor timing tests yet.) 2. How easy is it to use librsync? (Pretty easy.) 3. How small would a transfer-only tool be? (It's currently
2002 Sep 13
0
Rsync 2.5.5 (Digital Unix 4.0f) Large Filesets...
Hi, I've been trying to use rsync to backup the content of a large web application on our Digital unix servers. I'm having some success but the main problem is the sheer number of files and subdirectories which must be copied/maintained between the two servers (one is our standby system). Believe it or not there are in excess of 7.5 million files/directories which must be synced between
2002 Jan 24
5
Moving files revisited
I'd like to revisit the topic of moving files from system to system using rsync. I've just updated my patch from its 2.5.0 version to 2.5.1, and I'm curious what people think about getting it integrated into rsync. The patch comes in two parts. The first eliminates a potential hang condition that can happen if the data channel from the receiver to the generator gets clogged up.
2005 May 04
0
New win32-dir
Hi all, In lieu of Timothy''s pure Ruby junction code, and Zach''s VC++ 6 issues, I decided to just rewrite the dang thing in pure Ruby using Win32API. That will solve''s Zach''s problem and make it easier to add Timothy''s code, which I plan to add (slightly modified) to the 0.2.0 release. The code is below. One thing I have a question about is how to
2013 Sep 01
1
[PATCH] remove a duplicate tk function definition (and alphabetize)
'tkcoords' is defined twice (in the same way) in src/library/tcltk/R/Tk.R. Attached is a patch against r63780 that removes the duplicate definition and alphabetizes the functions. I've read that minor patches such as this should be sent to r-devel [1]. Scott [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.devel/33987 -- Scott Kostyshak Economics PhD Candidate Princeton
2003 Jan 15
2
Latest --files-from patch
If anyone is trying out my --files-from patch, please grab a new version from here: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rsync-files-from.patch I fixed a potential bug in the pathname-reading code when pulling files. This version also sanitizes all read pathnames, as discussed elsewhere. Remember that this patch is still young, so use it for testing only. ..wayne..
2002 Jan 05
2
rsync w/ openssh hangs on linux
Hello All: I've having repeatable problems copying files between linux machines using rsync-2.5.1 and various recent flavors of openssh. The symptom when testing with a single 2M file is that rsync hangs when when the file is 97% transferred. It seems from looking at various archives that this problem may be non-trivial. I tried applying the patch at
2003 Aug 09
0
rsync / rdiff in win/dos
Thanks Donovan, I downloaded the librsync 0.9.6 from sf and it compiled just fine believe it or not in the new visual studio.net. There where warnings but no fatal errors and the exe seems to be running just fine. I've tested it just now on a 60 meg mdb file that I've been trying to backup.. it seems to work great!. I even saved the original so I could apply patches and then file compare
2009 Nov 12
0
Problem with has_many :through, :uniq => true with polymorph
Didn''t have quite enough space to describe it there...basically i''m having a problem with the :uniq option in my tags. I''m using acts_as_taggable_on_steroid which adds these associations to my Resource class: Resource has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable, :dependent => :destroy, :include => :tag has_many :tags, :through => :taggings, :uniq => true
2009 Apr 21
2
looking for superlifter souce code and related information
Dear List, I just googled "superlifter" and found below link, but I can't get any source code. http://superlifter.sourceforge.net/ Any help or info on this is mostly appreciated. And sorry for the trouble, if it's NOT allowed to post here. THanks. -- Daniel
2002 Feb 08
1
Deleting files from source after a successful rsync !
I have a few clients who prepare some reports and put it in their outgoing/ directory for me to pick up every morning. Is there a way to delete those files from their outgoing/ after I fetch them ? Thanks Nishi
2002 Aug 04
1
MD4 bug in rsync for lengths = 64 * n
I am the author of BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net) and I am working on adding rsync support to BackupPC. I am implementing the server-side in perl, and the client will run vanilla rsync. (BTW, is there the protocol documented? I've answered all my questions by looking at the source, but it would be great to check against any docs.) I started with librsync 0.9.3 and the
2003 Mar 01
0
librsync [Solved]
I found the cvs repository at = http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/ The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have = been why google could not find it yesterday. I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated. The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot = from wherever cvs was at that
2003 Jun 12
1
questions about librsync
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding librsync, but couldn't find any others. I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this might be? Might I need a specific