similar to: minor error in "stderr & stdout" web site FAQ

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "minor error in "stderr & stdout" web site FAQ"

2015 May 10
1
FYI: dovecot (008632bdfd2c) compilation woes, and minor glitch regarding update-version.sh
Greg Rivers <gcr+dovecot at tharned.org> wrote: > On Saturday, May 09, 2015 22:25:48 Michael Grimm wrote: >>> or just try if it works if you change it to /bin/sh and use whatever >>> FreeBSD has that pointing to. >> That fails because /bin/sh equals /bin/csh at FBSD. > I don't know if it fails or not, but if it does this is not the reason. > /bin/sh
2007 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] Problem with regression tests using stderr
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > I think that it's a hold-over to how things used to be done. IIRC, > you had to have the && at the end of the RUN line if you had another > RUN line that needed to be executed. That's no longer the case, of > course. Thanks. I'll remove the && from the one test that still has it then.
2007 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] Problem with regression tests using stderr
Can you please file a bug for this (i havent seen one yet). Thanks, Tanya On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: >> I think that it's a hold-over to how things used to be done. IIRC, >> you had to have the && at the end of the RUN line if you had another >> RUN line that needed to be executed.
2007 Nov 27
1
[LLVMdev] Problem with regression tests using stderr
Ok, it's PR1826. Dan On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:15:38PM -0800, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > Can you please file a bug for this (i havent seen one yet). > > Thanks, > Tanya > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Dan Gohman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I think that it's a hold-over to how things used to be
2016 Apr 27
3
Bourne shell deprecated?
On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or
2016 Apr 27
3
Bourne shell deprecated?
On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,
2016 Apr 27
1
Bourne shell deprecated?
Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:27:26PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> Some of the BSDs use to have a bourne shell and maybe some do, I don't know. >> > Yup. > >> bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts) which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other *nix systems. > > Bash can run
2007 May 16
2
Hidden folder when using Windows client
Hi, We have folder PDL012 which behaves as though it is hidden for Windows clients only, not Linux clients, in 1 folder on 1 samba server only. Tried increasing the debugging level but didn't quite understand the ouput. The folder PDL012 does not appear in the logging when connecting from Windows client. Nothing related to hiding files is set in smb.conf, therefore defaults to off.
2016 Apr 27
6
Bourne shell deprecated?
On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one >> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's >> all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the >> claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or
2016 Apr 27
5
Bourne shell deprecated?
>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >> > >> > > Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for > OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about > bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than > I remembered. If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:
2017 Dec 17
2
Dialect for shell scripts
Dear all, During a recent package submission, we were highlighted that some lines in our configure script didn't follow the correct syntax. The lines looked like this: x=$(($y/10)) We were indicated at the time that this is because the statement does not use Bourne shell syntax, which is absolutely true, and also that the manual warns about this, which is true again. So far everything
2016 Apr 27
7
Bourne shell deprecated?
Hello List, Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else? Thanks, Jack
2017 Dec 19
3
Unable to run TeamViewer 13 under Centos 7 (amd64)
Manish Jain wrote: > > On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and installed the version you indicated, but >>>> I >>>> get nothing at all: >>>> >>>> /home/bourne # teamviewer
2017 Dec 18
2
Dialect for shell scripts
>>>>> I?aki ?car writes: Same from here: in addition to what the standards say, it always pays to be defensive and check "Portable Shell Programming" in the Autoconf manual. Among other things, this says '$((EXPRESSION))' Arithmetic expansion is not portable as some shells (most notably Solaris 10 '/bin/sh') don't support it. motivating
2017 Dec 19
2
Unable to run TeamViewer 13 under Centos 7 (amd64)
On 12/19/2017 03:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and
2015 Apr 27
3
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is > > no such maintained web page. > > I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to download it. I thought I don't need to make advertizing for
2012 Jul 01
7
btrfs_print_tree?
HI, Do anyone know where btrfs_print_tree is invoked? thanks. -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2017 Dec 19
2
Unable to run TeamViewer 13 under Centos 7 (amd64)
On 12/19/2017 02:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: > > > On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and
2017 Dec 19
6
Unable to run TeamViewer 13 under Centos 7 (amd64)
On 12/19/17 19:55, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/19/2017 07:16 AM, Manish Jain wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am writing a book about Unix (Linux / FreeBSD) and my book needs >> documentation for TeamViewer13 running under Centos 7 (64-bit). >> >> Unfortunately, running TeamViewer does not get me a GUI -- the install >> went smoothly and teamviewerd daemon is