Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Update: WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsyncdaemon]"
2002 Apr 14
1
Update: WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon]
UPDATE
i able to ssh between this 2 remote server, below is the extra info
rsync -avue ssh . username@hostname::sharefolder
WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon
rsync: failed to connect to HOSTNAME: Connection timed out
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(89)
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
2002 Apr 17
4
rsync HELP!!!
Sonu: I'm giving the whole history to the rsync list. If the tests i
subscribed passed, yet you get that error, it's more in depth than i can
go into. You've got 1 hour, let's hope somebody immediately recognizes
the problem. I've got some ideas, but no time to explore any more for
you.
Gentlemen: does anybody see a quick resolution for Sonu? Looks like he's
2004 Jan 05
0
No subject
see a copy of your rsyncd.conf?
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM
perl -e 'print pack(nnnnnnnnnnnn,
19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970),
".\n" '
"There are some who call me....
2001 Nov 20
3
Is anybody else gettting these?
I keep getting these smarmy sermons from somebody's mail account. I
include my response to it below, though from its message, it probably
won't be read.
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM
perl -e 'print pack(nnnnnnnnnnnn,
2002 Jan 25
0
suid files and bsd - correction
it's in syscall.c, not generator.c
You'll have to save the status of the lstat, modify the mode in st, and
return the lstat status. I don't know how to do it, though.
#if SUPPORT_LINKS
int do_lstat(const char *fname, STRUCT_STAT *st)
{
#if HAVE_OFF64_T
return lstat64(fname, st);
#else
return lstat(fname, st);
#endif
}
#endif
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
2002 Mar 13
0
AW: ssh + permissions
The "-a" option (the "--links", "--perms", "--devices", and "--times" options are redundant, as
they, as well as "--owner", "--group", and "--recursive" are implied by
"-a" )does dictate that permissions on files being sent be brought over
from the source. Are all files losing permissions, or only files
2002 Feb 14
0
unexpected EOF in read_timeout (was Re[2]: [Fwd: Re: meaning of "IO Error: skipping the delete...."]])
I should have specified what i was replying to. This section seemed to be
in reference to what I had experienced before.
"
> Well, I'm stumped too. (Although I thought I'd read that the
> default timeout was not infinite when not otherwise specified,
> but I've got so much going on right now that I could easily be
> confused on that one!)
>
"
Tim Conway
2002 Jul 25
0
non-interactive ssh connections (was Re: RSYNC ISSUE)
Gouri: close. Try "Ssh-keygen -p -P ''". You might argue that ssh should guess that -P imlplies -p, but that's
an issue for your ssh maintainer.
Also: you don't ordinarily distribute the private key. You need the
PUBLIC key in $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys on any system you want to access
with the private key. Maybe i'm seing your application backward, and you
2002 Nov 15
0
RFE: using rsync as a backup tool (preserve access time & com press destination files) ?
The way gnutar "preserves" atime is by noting it before the read, and
setting it back after the read, thus wiping out a legitimate setting of
atime occuring during that interval.
Yeah, the netapps mess with unix times. Did you notice that mtime and
ctime always match?
Now that I know you're on a netapp, though, your problems are solved.
Snapshot and sync from the snapshot, then
2002 Apr 24
1
Rsync from NT to UNIX
You're set, unless you declined ssh in your cygwin installation (without
cygwin, you're not doing rsync from windoze). It's just like unix, in
that case. (Bonus clue: Under related commands for ssh, you'll find
ssh-keygen).
If you don't actually need to secure your content (you're not naked on the
internet, for instance), you can just let rsync use plain old rsh
2002 Jun 07
1
rsync option
Approximated petitioner:
Perhaps this will help.
SunOS 5.7 Last change: 25 Jan 2002 5
User Commands rsync(1)
-C, --cvs-exclude auto ignore files in the same way CVS
does
--existing only update files that already exist
--ignore-existing ignore files that already exist
2002 Mar 30
2
(no subject)
A: do you have a "hosts allow" or "hosts deny" in rsyncd.conf?
B: what version are you using? It seems i've seen messages about rsyncd
in some versions refusing to allow unresolvable names in.
C: Are you able to access the rsyncd, and just wonder about the log
entries, or are you unable to get in? If it's just a log complaint, I
wouldn't worry about it. Most
2001 Oct 16
1
(no subject)
There's nothing in rsync to do that. How about making the files and directories all belong to another user, set the sticky bit and write for your rsync user on the directories, unset write for the files, and rsync that way, then chown afterwards? the
updates to existing files will fail, leaving you only with new.
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor -
2002 Mar 13
0
Queston on using the delete option
You brought up a very good point which described what rsync can and can
not do. Because of the robustness of this application, we are trying
to find a way to use rsync and replacing our current primitive system
which uses tar and send the data over a small pipe.
Since my last posting, I have thought about not using the
"--delete"option and instead, gather a list of files to be
2001 Oct 17
0
rsync digest, Vol 1 #403 - 4 msgs
> If you have a set of files that are "common" to each side but for whatever reason the content of which you want to keep separate and "localized" then look into using --include and --exclude rules or perhaps an exclusion file. The syntax always gets me
> and it might take a couple of tries to get the right sequence of element inclusions.
Rene
> --__--__--
>
2002 Jan 17
0
FW: SSH Error
-
call me ignorant... but I am not above asking. Where do I define
$RSYNC_SSH=ssh at?
Thanks for the info!!
David
-----Original Message-----
From: rsync-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-admin@lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of tim.conway@philips.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:08 PM
To: David L Nickel
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: SSH Error
Ok, you're talking about ssh, and
2001 Oct 19
1
rsync errors
Ah... there's your answer. ssh is working fine, as you say, but you're invoking rsync without telling it to user ssh, so it's using rsh. If you've got this, you don't need rsyncd.conf. The syntax you're using tells rsync to use an external transport.
rsync -e ssh file rmt_host:/tmp
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880
2002 Mar 16
1
(no subject)
I have a similar problem with rsync, though it's not consistent.
sometimes, things just don't come over, and sometimes, things just don't
get deleted. Repeated runs usually correct it. If it's the case of a
directory being replaced with a non-directory, you'll have to add
"--force" to get it to happen. Hope it helps.
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
2002 Oct 29
1
configuration question.
Your users have rsh access to the machine, and are getting wherever they
want, using the server:/path syntax.
if they were using the server::module syntax, they would be restricted to
only what's provided by the modules. If you don't want them getting
everything all over the system, you will need to prevent shell access.
Tim Conway
conway.tim@sphlihp.com reorder name and reverse
2013 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] Commutability of X86 FMA3 instructions.
Hi Elena,
Thank you very much for looking in to that.
I'll go ahead and remove the isCommutable flag from those
instructions, since it sounds like that's the right thing to do. I
would still like to change the default from the 231 variant to 213
too, as this will reduce code-size for accumulator-style loops. I have
at least one benchmark that shows significant speedups when this
change