similar to: Splint annotations for rsync from CVS

Hi -- I'm trying to package R for inclusion on some upcoming Red Hat Powertools distribution. I have started with the 0.61 version packaged by Martyn Plummer <plummer at iarc.fr> (Thanks Martyn!) and have upgraded to 0.62-2. I have succeeded in running R demo's on i386-redhat-linux-gnu, and now I am also trying to get the alpha and sparc versions working. On sparc-redhat-linux,

I am trying to understand idea for splint, but it use Fortran code. Does anyone know how to see that Fortran code? Is splint a not-knot spline method? Thanks, jfm [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Greetings - Does CRAN or someone similar make a splint / lint-like syntax checker for R? I realize that both ESS and the debug package and similar tools have debugging and error analysis features, but those appear to require running the code through the R buffer. I'd like something that did basic syntax and object-name verification for code that was to run in batch, as a precursor to

Hi Arjen, just to revive the static code analysis thread... It would be nice if you could expose your ideas and the results of your tests. Also, apart from Splint, have you tested any other systems?

Greetings, I'm using centos3 to study for rhce, centos came highly recommended in Michael Jang's rhce study guide. I've been having trouble isntalling via nfs, an early exercise in the book, and googling around leads me to think it might be an anaconda bug. I tried following the anaconda link on the "upgrading from 3.1" page but it's actually a duplicate of the

Hi, I have a little request, which should be considered "very very very very low priority" but would be useful nonetheless... in Makefile.in there are two lines with additional space at end of line and my editor strip it, so I must hand-edit the cygwin-specific patch in order to create the package (nothing serious: only patch is using /usr instead of /usr/local as a default prefix and

2010/2/17 Arnaud Quette > 2010/2/17 Arjen de Korte: > > Citeren Charles Lepple: > > > >> I wonder if there are any cross-compilation targets we could use to test > >> some of the word-size assumptions. Also, we could add in some static > >> analysis tools. > > FYI, I submitted NUT to the Coverity Scan program > (http://scan.coverity.com) last

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On 01/13/2017 12:29 AM, Mehdi Amini wrote: >> >>> On Jan 12, 2017, at 5:02 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >>> On 01/12/2017 06:20 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:13

Nadav (or anyone who is familiar with the loop vectorizer), Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? I am asking this because I would like to have loop vectorization disabled for targets that don't support SIMD instructions (for example, standard mips32). Loop vectorization

If anyone would like to help test the latest RPM on Centos 3, heres your chance. There are several new features that are not mentioned in Jeff's email, but as he said he wants to make sure it does no harm more than anything else. As an example though, this version supports: - runtime depedency checking (think of being able to have cpan modules that weren't installed by rpm being

Hi, Would just like to inquire if anyone here has a setup of asterisk to send traffic to AS5400 connected to an SS7-PRI.? this is more of a AS54 question, as i've been reading and i always stumble upon PGW2200 as a requirement to handle SS7 signaling on the AS54. Has anyone able to send calls from asterisk to an as 54 with SS7-PRI without PGW2200? TIA Regards, Nhadie --------------

I have been looking for a way from the dialplan to inquire if there are any members in a queue. So what I want to do is if no users are members of a queue then I can send the call to a given extention. I have the queue setup all that is working. Just need to be able to send the call to a certain user if no-one is logged into the queue. How do I do that? Thanks Jerry

Hello, I can not install rsync 2.5.5. on a Caldera Open Unix 8.0.0 Operating System. After ./configure I enter the command "make" and I get the following Message: UX:make: FEHLER: Zeile 66: Syntaxfehler Where can I get help? I add the files: config.log and Makefile. P. Schnickmann -------------- next part -------------- This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running

My data: > dput(mydata) structure(list(V1 = c(1328565067, 1328565067.05, 1328565067.1, 1328565067.15, 1328565067.2, 1328565067.25), V2 = c(0.0963890795246276, 0.227296347215609, 0.240972698811569, 0.221208948983498, 0.230898231782485, 0.203282153087549), V3 = c(0.0245045248243853, 0.0835679411703579, 0.0612613120609633, 0.058568910563872, 0.0511868450318788, 0.0557714205674231 )), .Names =

> On Jan 20, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 01/13/2017 12:11 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: >> >>> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/13/2017 12:29 AM, Mehdi Amini wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jan 12,

Hello, With some trepidation I've come to inquire about platform requirements for * after having spent a couple of hours searching and browsing the archives and skimming the Handbook (very nice). I've found recommendations for 800-1000 Mhz and 128-256 MB RAM machines. My curiosity is not about what machine I need to start using * to support live comm ops. Rather, I want to know if a

Hi Nadav, On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Akira! > > > > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of > the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to > vectorize a loop? > > Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. > At the

I was trying to work through a PDC problem that I was having with 3.0.23a noted in bug 3964. I didn't know how to apply the offered patch and my distro, FC4, has not offered an update yet to 3.0.23b so I thought that I would revert to a previous version that is not affected by this bug. I forced an install of 3.0.23 samba, common, and client and now rpm reports that I have two versions of

Hi Akira! > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. At the moment only x86 provides the necessary hooks that are needed for calculating the costs. We may need to change the cost defaults to

Hi All, We've been working on enhancing LLVM's instrumentation based profiling by adding indirect call target profiling support. Our goal is to add instrumentation around indirect call sites, so that we may track the frequently taken target addresses and their call frequencies. The acquired data has uses in optimization of indirect function call heavy applications. Our initial findings