similar to: Incremental backups and batch mode.

I have written test.ll as below and ran 'opt' on it as " opt -std-compile-opts test.ll -S -o -" . But the output shows that there is code motion around the barrier intrinsics. test.ll ------- ; ModuleID = 'test.bc' define void @test(i16* %I_0, i16* %I_1, i16* %I_2, i16* %I_3, i16* %O_0) { entry: %T_0 = load volatile i16* %I_0 %T_1 = load volatile i16* %I_1 %T_2 =

is there any guarantee that the nvptx intrinsic "llvm.nvvm.barrier0" will not be moved around by opt ? In other words, can I expect all the instructions above "llvm.nvvm.barrier0" to remain above it and those below it to remain below, after all the opt passes are run ? If that is not the case, is there a way to define such an intrinsic ? Thanks. -------------- next part

I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship, remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites), Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written, could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's response for the state of rsync,

Hello, can anybody here explain what a Jonckheere-Terpstra test is and whether it is implemented in R? I just know it's a non-parametric test, otherwise I've no clue about it ;-( . Are there alternatives to this test? thanks for help, Arne

Hi,   I have a system in which I analyze 2 subjects and 1 variable, so I have 2 models as follow:   y ~ x_1[, 1] + x_2[, 1] + x_1[, 2] + x_2[, 2]   Where   x_1[, i] = cos(2 * pi * t / T_i) x_2[, i] = sin(2 * pi * t / T_i)   i = 1, 2   Data have two columns: t and y.   As you can see, I have a multiple components model, with rithm and without trends, and I have a fundamental

So the short summary of my problem is, the batch file rsync creates is HUGE for a very small change. The idea is to create workstation image with partimage, update it with some software and send the image update diff over the wire to a large number of destinations over a satellite link, but the batch file updates are several orders of magnitude too large. I don't know exactly how partimage

So I thought I'd get a head start for next week - I have a low-power Linux box that has a few samba shares mounted, and limited hard disk space. This box is connected to a tape library via SCSI card. I want to find the best way to create a full, then incremental backup of the samba mounts, directly to tape. Some of the samba mounts are appliances that cannot run any special

For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic] test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html Here's the tar file of the new

our daily backup is done using the rdiff-backup tool, which in turn utilizes rsync/librsync to do the actual mirroring work. a few days ago we did a refactoring and renamed a bunch of directories. for backward compatibility we maintain the old names by symlinking it to the new names. so, for example, oldname1/ now becomes newname1/, and oldname1 is now a symlink to newname1/. we found that

Hi, Is there a way in which rsync's -z compression (zlib) utility can be benchmarked? I'm trying to compare the compression ratio between rsync and external compression tools like gzip and bzip2. Are there any advantages to using rsync's internal compression mechanism specified with the -z option compared to solely applying external compression i.e. bzip2 to the files and invoking

Hi all. (I am sending this querry here because it is somehow relating to rsync. If i am wrong please pardon me.) I am doing following on these windowsXP and Vista. I am trying to get only incremental backup using "rdiff-backup" (that also uses rsync). I have installed gcc compiler and by following the steps given in http://katastrophos.net/andre/blog/2005/11/02/rdiff-backup-on-windows/

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for > > case 1), 3), and 4). > > Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably > something stronger than md4 like SHA-1. md4 is probably good enough for most

>From what I understand, the incremental rsync algorithm saves on network bandwidth, but does rsync then just merge that delta data to end up with the new version and full sized file on the destination filesystem? I have these Microsoft Entourage databases files that modified often and can be a few gigs in size... I want to back them up with rsync, but if the whole file is backed-up each

Hello, lately I've been playing with the idea of doing in-place updates of systems using either rsync or xdelta. However, both rsync and xdelta seem to be dead set on writing a new file first, and then atomically exchanging it with the old file. Now, as I want to apply a binary delta to a full filesystem, bigger than the available temporary space, this really makes rsync and xdelta

I'm working on a personal project which involves lowering a superset of LLVM to "vanilla" LLVM. Part of this involves rewriting types. I'm working off of the 2.6 code base, so this may have been addressed in a bug fix. I'm having trouble with refineAbstractType and recursive types. Specifically, I'm creating opaque types to serve as placeholders for the final

Hi all, I'm trying a java implementation of rsync for "fun and profits" ;-) helped by librsync 0.9.7 and jarsync (a died java implementation) So i started to implement rdiff command and for now i have a working signature command. With first test, i had the same signature file of testsuite/mksum.input/COPYING.sig but when i try with another dummy file, for each checksum pair :

Has xdelta (in ports under misc/xdelta) ever been considered as a means of delivering binary patches for security updates? It seems to be a pretty neat. -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: signature Url :

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/39 - Release Date: 2005-07-04

I've been working for the past few months with open-source solutions for syncing Palm PDAs (Coldsync, mostly). I've been becoming increasingly annoyed with Palm's Desktop Link Protocol and the sync mechanism, and am considering replacing it with a third-party application for the Palm. Since I've had good luck with rsync in the past, its seemed an obvious choice. I've

hello, I'm new to this list. here is my question: I would like to synchronize two computers (say the home one and the job one) using zip drives or similar (cdroms, etc), since modem lines are quite slow and expensive (in Italy). I though I could produce the "signature" of files on home computer, store it on a zip, go to job, run rsync to copy the missing or altered files on