Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "how to prevent forward/reverse lookups"
2002 Aug 30
1
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed; reverse lookups?
Hi.
My goal is to use rsync to syncronize box1 and box2. On box2, I have a
tapedrive which I write the data I syncronize from box1 every night.
On box1, my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like this:
root@box1# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf
max connections = 1
syslog facility = local6
[tmp]
path = /tmp
read only = yes
comment = export of /tmp
hosts allow = box2
auth users
2002 Jan 23
2
Rsync 2.5.1 on Solaris 8 reverse lookup failures
I get the following log messages using rsync 2.5.1 compiled on Solaris 8
when using the "hosts allow" option in rsyncd.conf:
2002/01/23 12:09:51 [28276] rsync: reverse name lookup mismatch on fd0 -
spoofed address?
2002/01/23 12:10:18 [28276] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (16 bytes
read so far)
Resolv.conf/DNS are configured and working properly with both A and PTR
records
2002 Mar 12
2
Need help getting rsync working...
I have so far been unable to get rsync to work properly in a test setup.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Both PCs are running RedHat 7.2.
The Server:
IP Address 192.168.0.202
Server Name: RH72TB
hosts.allow ALL: 192.168.0.201
rsyncd.conf:
[testmodule]
path = /tmp
The Client:
IP Address 192.168.0.201
hosts file:
192.168.0.202 RH72TB
I have run "rsync --daemon" on the server.
2002 Mar 16
1
(no subject)
I have a similar problem with rsync, though it's not consistent.
sometimes, things just don't come over, and sometimes, things just don't
get deleted. Repeated runs usually correct it. If it's the case of a
directory being replaced with a non-directory, you'll have to add
"--force" to get it to happen. Hope it helps.
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
2002 Feb 24
2
Write-only option
Hi!
I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some
time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users
from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've
hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When
set to true, this option forbids the transfers from server to the client,
thus solving
2001 Dec 15
1
reverse name lookup failed
Any time I try and setup a hosts allow option in the modules I get the
following errors:
I'm running this from the client.
rsync -rv ws2743::test3 /pw/prog/BOS/stuff
@ERROR: access denied to test3 from unknown (::3)
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (62 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(139)
I get the following from the log file on the
2002 May 16
2
possible bug rsync-2.5.5 rsyncd.conf option "max connections"
Hello,
I think i may have found a bug in the "max clients" option in rsyncd.conf
[we use rsync-2.5.5; All platforms I tried (Irix-6.5.14 and various linux
flavours) show the behaviour explained below]
The manpage says:
|max connections
| The "max connections" option allows you to specify
| the maximum number of simultaneous connections you
| will allow to
2002 May 08
1
rsyncd.conf;
I have some rsync defined as a server on one of my production systems and
use to to sync out various configuration files for services running on the
box (dhcpd, dns named.conf files & the like). Both ends are Compaq
Alpha/Tru64 5.1 systems running rsync 2.5.5.
I'm having a fit trying to include certain files in specific subdirectories
under the main path; one such example is below:
2002 Dec 04
1
My first rsync experience
Before I start let me say I'm a relative newbie to rsync so bear with me. I've just installed
version 2.5.5 and set up the following files on the server:
inetd.conf
rsync stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/bin/rsync rsyncd
--daemon
rsync.conf
[www]
path = /test/test2
comment = Test
services
rsync 873/tcp
then I run 'rsync --daemon'
2002 May 22
4
restricting rsync over ssh
Is it true that when running rsync via ssh (i.e. rsync -e ssh ...) the
rsyncd.conf file is not applicable on the remote since rsync is launched
via the ssh exec call once connected rather than from rsyncd as in a
direct connect.
If so, I am trying to find the best way to restrict rsync -e ssh on the
remote machine. Prepending the authorized_keys entry with
command='rsync ...' 1024...
2002 Mar 03
2
rsync with -ls option
Howdy,
I'm trying to get a report from rsync using the -n option which will
produce a report of files that are different in a ls -al kind of style so
one could analyze what's different before possibly clobering a good file.
Is this possibly in the works or does anyone have any ideas on how this
might be done. It seems like a useful option to rsync to have.
Regards,
George...
2002 Feb 28
2
lost status code
Rsync reports the status code of the remote command. So in some
situations the status code is successful when the command fails.
Rsync of a remote file to a local read-only directory fails, but
exits with $status = 0. I'd like to get $status = 23. Is it
possible?
Local copy fails with status = 23
> mkdir /tmp/nowrite
> chmod -w /tmp/nowrite
> rsync /etc/group /tmp/nowrite || echo
2002 Jun 11
2
Some files always copied to W2K system
I am copying from a rsync --daemon
(have tried from both W2K/cygwin & Linux daemons) to a W2K machine.
Some files get copied every time even though they haven't been touched
since the last copy. I have experimented and deturmined that the file
size seems to be important. If the file is between 926 & 933 bytes
long it will always be copied!! Other sizes and possibly other aspects of
2002 May 22
1
rsyncd listing of directories
I just took a look at the 2.5.5 codebase to see how easy it would be to
write a little driver script that downloads a big directory tree from an
rsync daemon the chunky way (get a list of a module's subdirectories and
do the transfer by subdirectory). The reason for doing this is obvious
when you have large directory trees, as is the case for many of us.
Unfortunately the way list_only is
2002 Mar 06
3
Error messages
Hi,
We got the following error messages when we ran rsync 2.5.2
from Solaris-5.5.1 to Solaris-5.8.
vl121909/jagcdms_ch+_diags/sys/sys_l/ch_sys/rtl/systop.v
vl121909/jagcdms_ch+_diags/sys/sys_l/ch_sys/rtl/sysup_esat.v
vl121909/jagcdms_ch+_diags/sys/sys_l/ch_sys/rtl/upesat_defines.h
wrote 63878001383 bytes read 1529124 bytes 1246928.64 bytes/sec
total size is 148182624008 speedup is 2.32
rsync
2002 Nov 27
1
Trailing Slash Inconsistencies
Hello,
I am noticing inconsistencies when using a trailing slash on the source
directories in conjunction with the '--delete' option. In one instance
when using a trailing slash files get deleted from subdirectories in the
destination tree. In the other instance they don't. I am using rsync
2.5.5. The following are the scenarios:
Scenario 1
----------
*nix(src) ---> *nix(dest)
2002 Feb 20
8
map_ptr warning
I am trying to finalize the use of rsync for updatiung a new nfs server
before we take the old one offline. I keep getting the following
warning during the rsync process:
Warning: unexpected rad size of 0 in map_ptr
Any ideas where this comes from and how to make it go away? I am using
rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 8 to pull data from rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 7.
Bob
roconnor@vectorpartners.com
2002 Apr 14
1
Exclude & --delete not working?
Hi there,
we have an odd problem, which maybe how rsync is
intended to work, but I think not: On server side, we
run rsync in daemon mode with a share [foo] that has a
serverside path of /foo. On client side, we invoke
rsync -zavuSH --delete server::foo/ /foo. The rsync
daemon uses an exclusion list.
The problem is, the client rsync deletes clientside
whatever is in the exclusionlist. If I read
2002 May 07
3
openssh 3.1 and rsync dont work
Maybe this is a ssh problem - but are you aware of the general issue ?
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182
Summary: ssh should still force SIGCHLD to be SIG_DFL when
calling ssh-rand-helper
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.1p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
2002 Dec 05
1
Patch to ignore exluded files.
I came up with a patch to fix the problem of IO Errors caused by
excluded files as did Eugene V. Chupriyanov below.
Is there a chance that this change will show up in a future version of
rsync?
Is there a reason that we should not ignore IO errors when copy_links is
off? Just want to make sure that I'm not missing something here that
may corrupt my syncs....
Here's the version that