similar to: Latest version of the batch mode cleanup patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Latest version of the batch mode cleanup patch"

2004 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite
Wayne, Please consider the attached patch. This applies to the current CVS, and is independant of patches/local-batch.diff. As a matter of fact, I'm sure it would conflict heavily with local-batch.diff. This version of batch mode has a couple distinguishing features: Write-batch records (almost) the entire sender side of the conversation into one file. ("Almost" because it has
2004 Jun 17
1
[PATCH] make write_batch local
Wayne, It's taken a little while for me to get more familiar with the code, but I think I've reached a good breakpoint in improving batch-mode. Let me highlight some of the changes in the attached patch: * --write-batch and --read-batch arguments are no longer passed from client to server. This fixes the current problem that causes the server threads to die when the client
2003 Mar 08
1
[patch] rsync over existing I/O connections (new feature)
Hello, I wrote this patch that allows you to run rsync over an existing I/O connection, instead of creating a new rsh or socket connection. For example, I have a client and server that talk over ssh via a simple custom protocol. I want to use the existing ssh connection to transfer files, but I want the flexibility of rsync to do it. With this patch, I can do the following in my client
2002 Jun 02
1
batch diffs
I needed a tool to produce diffs of binary volumes, and to apply them as patches accordingly. So I tried the 'batch mode' that was added to rsync, but it invariably segfaulted on reading the batches... $ sh foo.rsync_argvs foo.rsync_argvs: line 1: 8971 Segmentation fault rsync -a -v --stats --read-batch=foo ${1:-FOO} rsync: error writing 64 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe
2003 Jan 14
4
specifying a list of files to transfer
Hi, I don't want to start another --files-from war, but I am attaching an updated version of my patch to allow you to specify a list of files to transfer. The normal rsync syntax allows you to specify a list of SRC files to transfer on the command line. This patch adds some new options to allow you to instead supply a file that contains a list of files to transfer. The previous version of
2003 Jul 24
0
(no subject)
Here is a diff which should allow applying batch updates remotely ( as apposed to copying the batch files to the remote server and running rsync there ). Eg rsync --write-batch=test src dst1::dst rsync --read-batch=test dst2::dst Oli Dewdney diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/flist.c rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/flist.c *** rsync-2.5.6/flist.c Sat Jan 18 18:00:23 2003 ---
2004 Oct 05
0
new option implemented: --delete-mdays
Hi folks, we would like your feedback on a new option we have implemented. We would like to know whether it should be merged into the CVS tree. Perhaps one of the rsync developers can have a look at the code, improve it where necessary, and committ it to CVS. The name of the option is "--delete-mdays=DAYS" and it works in conjunction with the option "--delete." It modifies
2005 Mar 21
4
Patch: Offline transfer mode
Hi All, Here's an rsync patch which adds an --offline flag, letting you transfer changed blocks via removable media, while still comparing checksums via the net. I expect this could be very popular for the growing number of people who want to do disk-based offsite backups, which is what I needed it for. It took me longer than I hoped, but still only several hours to work this out -- it
2003 Aug 06
1
Should --progress implicitly assert -v?
I'd like to know if there's any support for changing the behavior of the -P and --progress options to increase the verbosity of the rsync command. Without -v, -P and --progress don't provide clear output: -v displays the current filename and -P and --progress display the progress of the current transfer. It's important that these two pieces of information work together since -P
2002 Sep 10
0
[PATCH] Add --preserve-atime switch to rsync
In the past there have been discussions about adding a switch to rsync to preserve the atime on files being copied by rsync. I needed this function for a project I'm working on and decided to invent it. I've attached the diffs. Note that this has the limitations describe in previous emails, namely that preserving atime causes ctime to not be preserved. *** Patch follows *** ***
2004 Mar 10
1
MD4 checksum_seed
Hi, The following lines in compat.c are rather imprudent: if (read_batch || write_batch) checksum_seed = 32761; else checksum_seed = time(NULL); write_int(f_out,checksum_seed); Setting checksum_seed to a constant in batch mode means block collisions are reproducible and predictable. Thus, some files will be permanently "unlucky" in batch mode and will
2002 Aug 02
1
[patch] --link-dest
Updated to current cvs without the --exclude-from - patch. This patch allows specifying a --link-dest path similar to --compare-dest except that unchanged files are hard-linked to the --link-dest path instead of producing a sparse tree. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember
2004 Oct 13
0
[Bug 1924] New: unable to rsync between a PC with cygwin and a unix machine using rsh
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 Summary: unable to rsync between a PC with cygwin and a unix machine using rsh Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2002 Aug 05
5
[patch] read-devices
Greetings, I'd like to propose a new option to rsync, which causes it to read device files as if they were regular files. This includes pipes, character devices and block devices (I'm not sure about sockets). The main motivation is cases where you need to synchronize a large amount of data that is not available as regular files, as in the following scenarios: * Keep a copy of a block
2002 Mar 08
1
[PATCH][RFC] space saving incrementals
Please CC me directly as i'm not on the list. I have attached a patch against latest CVS (cvs diff -u) that adds the following functionality. I can break it up if you would prefer it in pieces. Comments welcome. o add compare-perms option This creates a new inode for a file even if only the perms have changed. This way if a file outside of destdir is hardlinked to a dentry inside
2002 Jan 13
1
rsynd-2.5.1 / batch.c patch
Platform: Compaq OpenVMS Alpha 7.3 Compiler: Compaq C T6.5 The following patch is an update to a previous patch that I submitted. The only change from the previous patch is that the const qualifier has been added to write_batch_*() routines to improve compiler efficiency. Because the gdiff -u was done against the distribution it includes the previous patch. The functions with no parameters
2002 Feb 11
0
RSYNC 2.5.2 type mismatches in batch.c
Platform: OpenVMS Alpha 7.3 Compiler: Compaq C T6.5-002 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.3 Comile flags: /WARN=ENABLE=(LEVEL4, QUESTCODE) Best guess at UNIX equivalents of above compile flags: LEVEL4 = All warnings QUESTCODE = Do LINT processing on source. -John wb8tyw@qsl.network Personal Opinion Only batch.c (char *) is being used as a type, when a generic structure is being passed. (void *) appears
2004 May 29
1
[patch] Filename conversion
Hi, One feature missing from rsync, and requested on this list before, is on-the-fly conversion of filename character encoding. For example, I often need to sync files having Hebrew filenames from a UTF-8 system (Linux) to an ISO8859-8 system (Cygwin on Windows 2000 using the non-Unicode Win32 interface). Other circumstances surely abound. Attached is a patch against rsync 2.6.2 that adds an
2002 Mar 22
1
[PATCH] --link-dest option
Please CC me. I'm not subscribed. Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the --link-dest option so rsync will create hardlinks for unchanged regular files to a directory on the destination. This is like --compare-dest except that the result is not a sparse tree. Also included is extension to --(ex|in)clude-from to allow - for stdin. Could one of the maintainers please add
2001 Aug 06
1
merge rsync+ into rsync (was Re: rsync-2.4.7 NEWS file)
> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.