similar to: question on permissions

[I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat question] We have a set of cron jobs that do regular rsyncs mirroring two trees. This has been pretty stable. Over the weekend, almost all of them broke with this message: rresvport: bind: Permission denied (15728) Error reading 4 bytes : EOF Under what conditions does this error occur? It looks like it couldn't bind

Does anybody know under what conditions does the error, "IO ERROR skipping delete" show up? I'm trying to sync some areas and getting this error. My guess is that rsync cannot access all the areas in the source. I got some permission denied errors prior to getting the IO error message.. sri

Hi folks, I'm having a problem with my rsync between two areas between a WAN. The problem is really odd. I have a script that runs every night. Lately, we've been having problems with rsync. The source side is an ordinary file while the destination side is a symlink. We've been having problems with rsync deleting the symlink and repacing it with the source copy despite having it in

Hi folks, I've been googling around for awhile but I can't seem to find an answer to my question. I have a number of filesystems that contain thousands of hard links due to some bad organization of data. Rsync, cpio and various other utilities fail to copy this data because I think there might be some cycles in it. (you know you have troubles if cpio can't copy it!) What I thought

Here is the structure of my servers : Source : /home/test1/link_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... sub_dir2 ... Destination: /home/test2/real_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... subdir2

I?m facing some troubles with file / directory permissions... I log on the domain as admin user(root), and theres a pub share, on witch everyone needs to have permission to create / modify files, but when I change or create a file, only root can change the file, no one else. And then i need to go to server to chgrp users * -R and chown nobody * -R to allow others users to change the file.

i am using chgrp and chown to change ownership from centos command line of paths for example domain users to use it in chgrp bur it is telling me the error that no such group exist. what i must do to be able to use samba users and groups from command line using chown and chgrp thank you

Hello, I need a way to set permissions to share folder without to use RSAT, I've not found anything about that. The samba wiki said that --------------------- Change permissions on folders of a share Changes of permissions are done using the classic *nix tools 'chmod', 'chown' and 'chgrp'. Example: Code: # mkdir /srv/samba/Demo/Example/ # chown foobar:DemoGroup

Hello, I have two Samba Domains and each trust each other (PDCs run 3.0.22). Also I have a samba member server (3.0.24) that runs winbind. When I use wbinfo I can see the user and groups of both domains. I also can chown/chgrp files with users of the domain the server is member of. But I can`t chown/chgrp with accounts of the trusted domain. chown doesn`t work at all. chgrp works, but then only

Hello everyone - Update: Many thanks to Matt Miller for the tip on usermod options. That worked very well! I did not know those options existed and would never have thought to look for them. After making and testing backups, I started with my main workstation. Rebooted in runmode=3, then ran the usermod -u and -g options. I did this in two runs. I first had to uninstall docker since it

Hi Davor, If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of having a specific FileShareAdmin group. But, why chown and not simply chgrp? Thanks! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From:

I''ve just installed express b28 on my system. After installing, I decided to move /opt to a zfs pool home/opt. After installing Blastwave''s latest sudo, I did my usual edits of sudoers. When I attempted to execute sudo ls to test things I got this: rtfm:/opt/csw/etc:>sudo ls sudo: /opt/csw/etc/sudoers is owned by gid 1, should be 0 But /opt/csw/etc/sudoers permissions

Hello: As someone making the move from STATA to R, I'm finding it difficult at times to perform basic tasks in R, so forgive me if I've missed an obvious and easily obtained solution to my problem. I've searched the help guides and the archives and have not been able to find a solution that works. I have a data frame with thousands of observations that looks something like this:

I just noticed that on centso 4.5 I have an executable with the +s (chmod +s myexe) doing a chmod root myexe and chown root myexe does NOT affect the +s setting. However, on centos 5 this is not the case. chmod +s myexe chown root myexe or chgrp root myexe will DROP the +s status. How can I get around this? I want to keep the owner, group, world settings. Thanks, Jerry

On 2/17/2016 10:32 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 18:07, Ian wrote: >> Actually, that works for me too. I just issued the command 'chgrp >> "BUILTIN\administrators" CoreLib' and it returned successfully for that >> folder. 'ls -la' shows: >> d---------+ 2 MMIA\domain admins BUILTIN\administrators 5 Dec 8 11:59 >> CoreLib//

Hello, I'm considering LLVM for a project, and I wanted to take a look at its bytecode representation/instruction set. So I decided to try to compile the /bin/ls command as bytecode (no particular reason to use ls) and look at it. So I got GNU coreutils from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.0.tar.gz, built it to make sure it works, then replaced gcc, ld, ar and ranlib with

we are migrating our standalone Samba sever (3.0.14a) on a Solaris 10 box to an RHEL 6.3 box. Testing shows that on Solaris 3.0.14a works with both the OpenLDAP server we are currently using and the IPA2.2 server as LDAP backend. But 3.5.10-125.el6 on a RHEL 6.3 box does not work with either. I can still map a share with 3.5 as owner of the shared directory, but secondary group ownership does

(I'm not sending this to dirvish@pegasus because I think that this message applies more to rsync's --link-dest option than to just dirvish.) I recently noticed a huge spike in dirvish network usage and traced it to files whose permissions had been changed. (with rsync v2.5.6) I understand and agree that a --link-dest copy of a source file cannot be hardlinked to, but couldn't a

I've got Samba 2.2.2 and winbind up and running fine between a TurboLinux server and an NT 4.0 PDC. I can "chown" files on the linux box fine using "$chown DOMAIN+username filename" but when i try to change an objects group using "$chgrp DOMAIN+groupname filename" i get errors stating that it is an invalid group name. What's the deal here? None of my group

Hi. I'm following this document: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member - setting up my second Samba server in a test environment. We're planning a medium to large-scale deployment (six sites, 8 domain controllers, 8 NAS boxes, 120 workstations). I've already set up an AD Controller and successfully joined a Windows workstation to it. I got down to