similar to: Files in use

We're thinking about putting rsync to use in our production environment. What we want to do is have a cron job running on a client that replicates files on the host every five minutes. We believe that some of the files will take longer than five minutes to complete. From the limited testing I've done it looks like the first rsync session correctly identifies the file as a candidate for

Hi Guys, I was looking at the code of ext3 file system and found some strange implementation there : Can someone please let me know the validity of below statements : 1. I found that it might also happen that journal is aborted but not re-mounted 2. Journal gets aborted but it might be possible to mount it in read-write mode. 3. Can we write some data on the partition where journal is

Sounds good, I'll reword that comment. Also, the assert you mentioned turned out to be a bad assumption when combined with how I foresee us handling inttoptr/ptrtoint in the future, so I'll just replace it with slightly more robust code. :) Thanks for the feedback, George On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi George, > > +// Given an

I think I've read somewhere about panic during early root mount, fsck etc.. Perhaps this might be related: Full dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/misc/dmesg.boot.amd64 [....] acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "vnode interlock" 1st vnode interlock @ kern/vfs_vnops.c:791 2nd vnode interlock @ kern/vfs_subr.c:2018 KDB: stack backtrace: witness_checkorder() at

I have wrote a small Linux Shell command for implementing Interlock Protocol which is known as a cryptographic protocol that resistant to man-in-the-middle attack. Here is the steps of interlock protocol: *(1)* Alice send her public key to Bob *(2)* Bob send his public key to Alice. *(3)* Alice encrypts her message using Bob's public key. Then she sends half of that encrypted message to

I see Intel has released a new tool. Oh, it requires some patches to the kernel to record latency times. Good thing people don''t mind patching their kernels, eh? So who can write the equivalent latencytop.d the fastest? ;-) http://www.latencytop.org/ -- cburgess at qnx.com

----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Burgess IV" <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "Jiangning Liu" <Jiangning.Liu at arm.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing > List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Daniel

[+llvmdev] Hi George, You're right, these tests are broken, and have been for a long time. As it turns out, at least in terms of the 2003-12-11-ConstExprGEP.ll test, this is related to a case we've been discussing in another thread ("Basic AliasAnalysis: Can GEPs with the same base but different constant indices into a struct alias?"). It seems like, to some extent, we used to

> I had thought that the case that Danny had looked at had a constant GEP, and so this constant might alias with other global pointers. How is that handled now? That issue had to do with that we assumed that for all arguments of a given Instruction, each argument was either an Argument, GlobalValue, or Inst in `for (auto& Bb : Inst.getBasicBlockList()) for (auto& Inst :

So, I split it up into three patches: - cflaa-danny-fixes.diff are (some of?) the fixes that Danny gave us earlier for tests + the minimal modifications you’d need to make in CFLAA to make them pass tests. - cflaa-minor-bugfixes.diff consists primarily of a bug fix for Argument handling — we’d always report NoAlias when one of the given variables was an entirely unused argument (We never added

> On Dec 4, 2018, at 10:59 AM, George Burgess IV <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think people are too eager to use `auto` because it is easy to write but it makes the types substantially harder for the reader to understand > > I'm probably the Nth person to ask this, but what keeps us from promoting the use of a clang-tidy-powered tool that basically

----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Burgess IV" <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > To: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Jiangning Liu" > <Jiangning.Liu at arm.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing

I am a new R user attempting to convert files from Statistica to R. I can export from Statistica to SPSS .por format, but not to the SPSS .sav format. Is there a procedure for easily accomplishing this, which will allow me to keep variable short and long labels (big surveys LOTS of time to replace all this work). Many thanks for sharing your time and knowledge. steve Dr Steven M Burgess

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gerolf Hoflehner" <ghoflehner at apple.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Jiangning Liu" <liujiangning1 at gmail.com>, "George Burgess IV" > <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014

It's found more and more like "get CFL-AA turned on by default" might be a viable GSoC project for the right student. It would require someone with existing knowledge of AA and a willingness to debug nasty problems, but it sounds like there's definitely interest in the community in seeing this happen. If the student finished early (unlikely), they could start on SCEV-AA as

(and sys::cas_flag that STATISTIC uses is a uint32 ...) On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Okay, dumb question: > Are you really getting negative numbers in the second column? > > 526,766 -136 mem2reg # PHI nodes inserted > > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/PromoteMemoryToRegister_8cpp_source.html >

I've put my changes to EarlyCSE that trigger this case up on phab here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19821. These changes depend on http://reviews.llvm.org/D19664 so that will need to be applied first. With these changes applied, the original attached .ll file should trigger this bug when compiled with opt -early-cse -early-cse-use-memoryssa On 5/2/2016 2:34 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >

Is there a way to cancel a specific effect? For instance; Effects are added to the queue. Before actually processing the effect, I''d like to check a condition & cancel the effect if necessary. Here''s the code excerpt: var menu = { toggleText: function(element,toggle) { var vis = $(element+''Text'').visible(); if (toggle && !vis)

> Should we be added an edge from the inttoptr to all other pointer values? Is there a better way? We can add a special "Unknown" StratifiedAttr and query it before anything else, i.e: // in CFLAliasAnalysis::query, as the first potential return if (AttrsA[AttrUnknown] || AttrsB[AttrUnknown]) return MayAlias; The only *potential* issue with this approach would be that in the

Hi George, On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, George Burgess IV <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the comments! > >> Have you considered changing our existing behavior to match GCC's >> builtin_object_size instead of adding a new parameter > > Yup! My issue with turning `i1 %min` into `i8 %flags` is that > __builtin_object_size would get