similar to: forced copying of non readable file

Hi, Can anyone send me an example config file that makes use of ignore nonreadable timeout 600 When I try to put this in a module - rsync seems happy but it gets nasty logfile messages when a client connects to the server. Oct 19 20:30:14 4T:sv1 rsyncd[3706636]: params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly fo rmed line in configuration file: ignore nonreadable Oct 19 20:30:14 4T:sv1

<P>Hi list,<BR><BR>is it possible to create something like a ISDN-WAN-WAN-ISDN bridge?<BR></P> <P>We have to change our location, but our number and the telephone system should shoulb stay the same.</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>kind regards,<BR>Patrick Stuckenberger</P>

HI, map.connect ''/ads/'', :controller=>''ads'', :action=>''index'' map.connect ''/ads/:id'', :controller=>''ads'', :action=>''show'' The above two lines i am using for routing in my application to show a list of ads when i visit at http:\\localhost:3000\add and an add with the id when i

Hi all. I've made this question over and over, but still no answer till now. So here goes again, maybe I have better luck this time. Is there any limitation to the number of groups a samba user may belong? I've found out that if the user belongs to more than 60 to 70 groups, group-based share access stop working. >From another post in this ml, i've found out that kernel 2.4.xx had

Daniele Palumbo <daniele@retaggio.net> wrote: >hi. > >I have troubles of global readable bit on new file created on samba. >I wish to have a 660 permission on new files, instead i've got 664. > >also, if i create an empty files it will get 644 permmission, instead of 660. > >directory creation instead seems fine. > >Below my environmnent and tests.

This is a patch to control unix permissions when uploading to a rsyncd-server by setting rsyncd.conf options. cu, Stefan -- Stefan Nehlsen | ParlaNet Administration | sn@parlanet.de | +49 431 988-1260 -------------- next part -------------- diff -ur rsync-2.5.5/loadparm.c rsync-2.5.5-umask/loadparm.c --- rsync-2.5.5/loadparm.c Mon Mar 25 05:04:23 2002 +++ rsync-2.5.5-umask/loadparm.c Sun Mar 2

Hi there list :) I use backuppc to take backup of a bunch of hosts, but I ran into problems with the last one I set up, I can't find anything that is different on this one...but it won't work... So any hints would be greatly appreciated, here are the files ryncd.conf: log file=/var/log/rsyncd pid file=/var/run/rsyncd.pid [all] comment = All disk path = / use

In case others find this of value, I wrote a patch to rsync 2.5.6 to give rsync in --daemon mode the ability to run a pre-transfer and post-transfer command. These options handle our need to prepare a server to receive files and to do some processing after receiving files. The options for /etc/rsyncd.conf are pretransfer script = /some/command/to/run posttransfer script =

I had rsync2.5.5 running fine ona RedHat Linux 8 system. I downloaded the rsync2.5.6 code and it compiled with no problems. However, operations which worked before are now failing. Here is my rsyncd.conf file uid = nobody gid = nobody # use chroot = no max connections = 4 syslog facility = local5 pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid motd file = /etc/rsyncd.motd [ftp] path = /var/ftp/pub

Hi, a few months ago I posted a message about using LDAP to store rsync secrets in LDAP. I received a response about patching the rsync source code with a patch file. I am now finally getting around to doing this, and when I tried to use the patch command 'patch --verbose ./rsync-2.5.6/authenticate.c rsync-ldap.patch' , it gives me the following error: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff

I'm using 2.6.3pre1 to transfer a rather large Debian archive (126GB, more than 30 million files). It contains about 450 daily snapshots, where unchanged files are hardlinked between the snapshots (so many files have hunderds of links). It's been running for some time now, and I found that while it's far from done, it's already used 165GB on the receiving end. Investigation shows

hello, i`m trying to use rsync via inetd and having problems. i`m getting 2009/06/15 18:25:29 [41082] name lookup failed for : ai_family not supported 2009/06/15 18:25:29 [41082] connect from UNKNOWN () when trying to write to rsync daemon via inetd. reading works fine. inetd.conf looks like this: rsync stream tcp nowait root /path/rsync rsync --daemon --log-file=/tmp/rsync.log

Hi, I've got an issue since about a week and I still can't solve it after a thorough research. I've setup a rsync server on my backup host, with shares using post/pre-xfer exec options but the scripts seems not to even be called : they should write a lockfile, and write in a logfile some information about the transfer request / report. I'm using rsync through stunnel and

Hi All, I am a newb to Rsync and I have a question. I am trying to back up our main server to a remote server. I have rsyncd.conf on the remote computer. I ran this command from the remote computer and it looked great the whole 2 seconds it took to run....it said it completed but now....I cant find any of the files on the remote server. Here is my rsyncd.conf #Global Options # motd file =

Hy there, My name is Alex Vladulescu, and i found this very interesting tool for backup files and folders over remote network servers. For the past four days i have been reading the FAQ on the site, google-ing the web for some answers on my local problem, but i am very stuck, nothing seems to answer my question so far. My issue consists on having a rsyncd.conf on a master server on which i

Hi! I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When set to true, this option forbids the transfers from server to the client, thus solving

We use rsync to provide an rsync share on a linux server with a javascript program on Windows clients which ensures all client data is backed up each morning. After making no progress with my posting last month regarding making a module upload only to prevent someone from manually downloading the rsync share obtaining other users work (exclude = * wasn't possible because we need --delete to

Hello, Noticed this (bug?) while testing out rsync. For a little background, I need to push files real-time to some front-end servers, and I am thinking of switching from some custom shell scripts that do this job to rsync. I am thinking of running rsync as a daemon on the front-end servers, and doing an upload from the back-end server to push the data out as it comes in. So, here is the deal:

Hi, I'm trying to get rsync 2.5.6 to authenticate users via openldap-2.0.23. I was looking through the mailing list archives and found a patch for rsync-2.4.6 that does this for me. I was just wondering if this is still valid, or if there has been a new patch or new implementation that has superceded this patch. Any help would be great. The message I am referring to is as follows:

Hello everyone. I have this issue: I?m rSyncing three folders from my main server to my backup server. Main is Ubuntu 7.10 64 bit and backup is Ubuntu 6.10 32 bit. Both are Rsync 3.0.2. Please advise me if there any other debug information I should provide. I get this output: building file list ... done Attachments_Redmine.tar.gz BackupRedmine.sql calidad/ calidad/DESVIOS QQ 1.2 ADVANTEK