similar to: new rsync feature

Hello, Chris's "keynote" at the LLVM Developers' Conference included a call for code owners, and my company has a heavy dependency on Bitcode, I propose taking ownership of: lib/Bitcode/* include/Bitcode/* This means that I'll be committed to documenting (yay) the implementation and responsible for reviewing patches and commits, as well as overall code quality and

Hi Rowland, I'm also not an expert, but with the amount of help you provide on the list, I will defer to you. I'd love to know your rational for prefering the "change ownership to administrator" approach over the "change group to Domain Admins approach". If it's just gut, that's fine too! Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at

Hi Rowland, Chown to Administrator seems less flexible than Chgrp to Domain Admins on the face of it. You could add/remove users from the Domain Admins group, which allows/denies them the ability to change the permissions on the share. By changing the owner to Administrator, only those credentials would have that ability, no? What advantages do you predict with the change owner approach? What

On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Chris's "keynote" at the LLVM Developers' Conference included a call for code owners, and my company has a heavy dependency on Bitcode, I propose taking ownership of: > > lib/Bitcode/* > include/Bitcode/* > > This means that I'll be committed to documenting

Thanks to this thread, we got it working too... but have a question... Once this is setup... does it stream forever, or does the stream only start when someone goes on hold/into a queue/etc? If it streams forever, at 24k... it looks like over 7GB/month in bandwidth... so we're not going to want to do that if a) it streams constantly and b) my math is correct. Thanks, Doug >

Hello, I am very new to R and data analysis in general. I am trying to generate values to append to my data frame using conditional statements. I am playing with this simple example: a <- c(1:4) b <- c("meep", "foo", "meep", "foo") d <- cbind(a, b) now what I want to do is , each time there is a "meep" in column 2 of d, print

I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc) replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). newdc also has a test share. I'm experiencing something strange whereby chmod and then an attempted file save causes a shared file to become zero bytes (despite the save not being blank, and also being denied): At olddc: 1) open \\newdc\testshare\yay.txt At newdc: $ ls -l total 8

Hi list, I'm running into issues with Samba 4.5.16-Debian. I am trying to get 3 DCs to talk to each other and replicate. DC1 and DC3 are on the same subnet; DC2 is on another subnet, accessible by IP. Currently, no firewalls on any of the DCs. Issue 1 - When I run "samba-tool drs showrepl", I get various results: DC1 - Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2

On Nov 11, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Chris's "keynote" at the LLVM Developers' Conference included a call for code owners, and my company has a heavy dependency on Bitcode, I propose taking ownership of: >> >> lib/Bitcode/*

Hi Joe, > Chris's "keynote" at the LLVM Developers' Conference included a call for code > owners, and my company has a heavy dependency on Bitcode, I propose taking > ownership of: > > lib/Bitcode/* > include/Bitcode/* > > This means that I'll be committed to documenting (yay) the implementation and > responsible for reviewing patches and commits,

On 27/02/15 21:00, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I'm also not an expert, but with the amount of help you provide on the list, > I will defer to you. > > I'd love to know your rational for prefering the "change ownership to > administrator" approach over the "change group to Domain Admins approach". > If it's just gut, that's

Hi, I've ran into an issue with a PRI provider in a major metropolitan area that I haven't needed to deal with before and I was hoping someone might have some insight on how to handle this within the Asterisk dialplan. At this location users can't always tell if a number is long distance or not (there are a lot of area codes and prefixes in the vicinity). Additionally, users are

Hi all, First off, we''re running Puppet 2.7.6 with Ruby 1.8.7 on CentOS 6.0. Now, I''m using tildes in a template to prevent newlines from appearing but ruby/puppet is choking on them. */tmp/puppet$ cat test.erb* Line 1: Line 2 will exist if running on CentOS. <% if operatingsystem == "CentOS" ~%> Line 2: Yay, we''re running CentOS. <% end ~%>

Hi, I use rsync in the following way to update some remote files over a low bandwidth line: rsync -v -r -z -t -p <local dir> <user>@<host>:<dir on host> After updating from rsync 2.5.2 to 2.5.4 I noticed that modified files are always copied completely. The problem seems to be related to the new (in 2.5.3) option -no-whole-file. The global variable whole_file is

Hello all, Sorry about the top-posting. I have added the bit about the linking (YAY!, I'm helping!). Now if we can clear up the ACL issue, this will be a great day! Summary: To edit ACL's from Windows on a Debian Member server, we need to either 1) map the domain admin to root OR 2) give explicit permissions to Domain Admins with a chmod 0755 and chgrp "MYDOM\Domain Admins"

Este no es el correo de Yanier ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba-request@lists.samba.org> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:02 PM Subject: samba Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13 > Send samba mailing list submissions to > samba@lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

On 27/02/15 20:07, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Chown to Administrator seems less flexible than Chgrp to Domain Admins on > the face of it. You could add/remove users from the Domain Admins group, > which allows/denies them the ability to change the permissions on the share. > By changing the owner to Administrator, only those credentials would have > that ability,

Hi all, (1st time post, I hope this is on topic...) I notice that CMake is listed as one of the C++ projects that clang can build: <http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html> I thought I'd pass on that I've created a nightly build of CMake that uses clang 1.1 (from llvm 2.7) <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/index.php?project=CMake> (search for 'clang') It does build, but...

Hi So I added a second DC with the rfc2307 option. It replicates and I auth works. yay. >> Does this also mean that the member server that will act as a file >> server should have idmap config = ad? > Only if you have manually added uidNumber & gidNumber attributes to AD I belive the microsoft admin tools have always been used to add users and groups Is 'idmap

Greetings folks, I just wanted to post a brief update on the status of the new pass manager. Philip asked me to do this at last month's social and Life intervened, but he's still got a great point, so I wanted to get it out there with one day to spare before he nagged me again. =D I'll keep it very brief and high level. If folks have questions about anything, happy to dig into it. -