similar to: rsync hangs after a number of files

hi, I'm having rsync trouble I installt an new version of rsync on my server and clients (2.4.6) first every thing workt fine but now I'm having a lot of trouble. I use the following command to upload: rsync -vcrulpog -e ssh --delete --exclude=*lost+found --timeout=60 --password-file=/etc/rsyncpasswd /exports/set1/ user@1.2.3.4:/exports/set1/ and it gives me the following error:

Oh, I appologize that I should not have asked about __main() ---- it appears in FAQ. But the question remains that why call to __main() can alias stack location? I think the memory location pointed by data_X pointers are not visible to __main(). In comparison, calls to printf() do not have similar effect. On 5/14/06, Nai Xia <nelson.xia at gmail.com> wrote: > > In a code segment of

In a code segment of my pass plugin, I try to gather AliasSets for all StoreInst, LoadInst and CallInst instructions in a function. Some behaviors of the pass puzzled me. Below is the *.ll of the test program which I run the pass on, it was get with "llvm-gcc -Wl,--disable-opt" from a rather simple *.c program. ---------------------------------- ; ModuleID = 'ptralias.bc'

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > Unfortunately, I did not locate the lines in steens-aa for "printf" special case. > In ds-aa, I found the lines below: Right, steens-aa and ds-aa share code for "local analysis", they just stitch it together into an interprocedural analysis in different ways. The code below is used for steens-aa. >

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > external global variables( and so inComplete ), Sounds right! > the call to printf will > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > Am I right ? :) If you've tested it then, yes you're right :). I haven't played with this stuff for a long time,

Hi Chris, I took a haste look at the "Points-to Analysis in Almost Linear Time" by Steens , your PHD thesis and SteensGaard.cpp in LLVM this afternoon. So I think: 1. Actually the basic algorithm described originally by SteensGaard does not provide MOD/REF information for functions. 2. The context insensitive part of Data Structure Analysis (LocalAnalysis) can be deemed as an

I'm rsyncing from an linux box to a win2k box with a precompiled version of rsync for win2k. durring the procces he gives me a lotte of the following errors (with different filenames): rename realother/Maildir/cur/.1005882149.8001_0.nyx.wildape,S=3080:2,.001002 -> realother/Maildir/cur/1005882149.8001_0.nyx.wildape,S=3080:2, : No such file or directory I user the command: rsync -cru

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 03:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > > > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > > external global variables( and so inComplete ), > > Sounds right! > > > the call to printf will > > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > > > Am I right ? :) >

Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp index bd60a84998..0de84fe9fc 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp +++

I am having a problem getting my files backed up to the location I want to from a WinXP client going to a Debian rsync server. The following is sending asm/ to /home/robert/backup folder. rsync -avz /cygdrive/d/asm robert@192.168.1.102:backup/ My understanding of the rsync man page is that this is supposed to send asm/ to what the path that is defined in rsyncd.conf, mine is defined as /backup.

--0__=H3pYBZPryUqFrHKFfIys0jD6E5DJia4vmWwghmZyVtkEnrsF4KhQPjM8 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Included is a gzipped tar archive with the config.h, config.log and a log of the compilation problem. Peter(See attached file: bug-R-0.99.0.tgz) --0__=H3pYBZPryUqFrHKFfIys0jD6E5DJia4vmWwghmZyVtkEnrsF4KhQPjM8 Content-type: application/octet-stream;

Hi, I'm a student studing for Math. & Infor. Ing. in Tirana,Albania and a have a final project in R to finish in a week, so I badly need your help... The topic of the project is "Hermite Interpolation" and a I have allready done a script that finds the approximation in a certan point x, H(x) ~f(x) but i want to find the value of his derivative H'(x)~f'(x) as well and to

Slowly we are getting to the point, that we miss enough optimization opportunities as the result of our own passes. For this we need to fix AlgebraicOpt to be able to handle mods on sources without creating new issues. The last patch enables looping opts. v2: update commit author Karol Herbst (3): nv50/ir: fix AlgebraicOpt for slcts with mods nv50/ir: handle logops with NOT in AlgebraicOpt

Yes, it is important that it only happens with certan BLAS, so probably not really an R issue. However, there has been some concern over the C/Fortran interfaces lately, so if you could narrow it down to a specific BLAS routine, it could prove useful for the developers. One fairly easy thing to do would be to find the breakdown point. I speculate that it could be at 16384 (=2^14) and that some

Slowly we are getting to the point, that we miss enough optimization opportunities as the result of our own passes. For this we need to fix AlgebraicOpt to be able to handle mods on sources without creating new issues. The last patch enables looping opts. Karol Herbst (3): nv50/ir: fix AlgebraicOpt for slcts with mods nv50/ir: handle logops with NOT in AlgebraicOpt nv50/ir: run some

If I write %reg16506<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg16506, %reg16445, hi16; #1 %reg16506<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg16506, %reg16468, lo16; #2 store %reg16506 #3 it will not coalesce, as LiveVariables: on #2: %16506 gets #2 as a kill #3: %16506 gets #3 as an additional kill LiveIntervalAnalysis:

Hi, I have a question regarding StrongPHIElimination. With (weak) PHIElimination, register classes seems to take care of themselves, but with the Strong version, I get illegal virtual register for instruction. In this testcase, I define the PHI operands into a bigger (super) RC, than what the using MI can handle. Weak PHI elim handled this by copying the PHI operands into the right RC. The

Hi, I am trying to take 16 bit memory reads and combine them to a single 32 bit read. I am having trouble to make the code simply read 32 bytes and the use the subregisters accordingly, without unnecessary copying. I have tried two techniques, in the MachineFunction: 1. replace the MachineOperands in the users of the data with the new register/subregister index. This yields an assert failure

hi Duncan Sands, i have tried the functions: GlobalValue * getNamedValue (StringRef Name) const GlobalVariable * getGlobalVariable (StringRef Name, bool AllowInternal=false) const GlobalVariable * getNamedGlobal (StringRef Name) const but i think these functions just return the ID or something else (not the Global Variable's main memory address, i am not sure) here is the thing. i

What about the coalescing - How could you schedule if you did not know which COPY's would remain/eliminated? This is why I would like to do scheduling after SimpleRegCoalesc. Jonas > Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 12:11:18 +0800 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Need advice on writing scheduling pass > From: etherzhhb at gmail.com > To: stoklund at 2pi.dk > CC: jnspaulsson at hotmail.com;