similar to: Feedback on 2.4.7pre1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Feedback on 2.4.7pre1"

2003 Jun 27
5
PATCH/RFC: Another stab at the Cygwin hang problem
Hi, In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html, I noted that the often-observed hangs of rsync under Cygwin were assuaged by a call to msleep(). After upgrading my Cygwin environment to rsync 2.5.6, I'm seeing these hangs again, not surprisingly given a CVS entry for main.c notes that this kludge was not harmless: Revision 1.162 / (download) - annotate - [select for
2003 Oct 03
2
Cygwin/rsync Hang Problem Testing Results
People of cygwin & rsync, I recently attempted to get cygwin and rsync working to solve a backup/mirroring need in my computer life. Well, as you might guess, I ran into a little but of trouble. Strangely enough, rsync seemed to be regularly hanging when I attempted to do a "get" (sycronize a remote to a local dir). Well, considering I want to automate this, that was not going
2003 Jan 03
1
[Fwd: Re: rsync windows -> unix still hanging :(]
Author of the message didn't include rsync@lists.samba.org in the reply, and I think this message is in topic. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: rsync windows -> unix still hanging :( Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:24:47 -0800 From: Jim Kleckner <jek_subs@kleckner.net> To: Mike Rubel <mrubel@galcit.caltech.edu> CC: cygwin@cygwin.com References:
2001 Nov 13
2
direct write patch
I have attached a patch that supports a new "--direct-write" option. The result of using this option is to write directly to the destination files, instead of a temporary file first. The reason this patch is needed is for rsyncing to a device where the device is full or nearly full. Say that I am writing to a device that has 1 Meg free, and a 2 meg file on that device is out of date.
2003 Jul 31
2
rsync 2.5.6 timeout bug
I've been getting frequent io errors trying to synchronise a local CPAN mirror with the master on ftp.funet.fi, the symptoms being the dreaded rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) message at the client end. I've replicated this when mirroring from a local CPAN mirror, and the issue seems to
2002 Feb 14
1
unexpected EOF in read_timeout (was Re[2]: [Fwd: Re: meaning of "IO Error: skipping the delete...."]])
This is where it sets a sort of 60 second timeout if you don't set a timeout at all. As far as what it affects, I'm not that good with the code. I just know that my big syncs would die in almost exactly 1 minute unless I specified a timeout, and then would die at that timeout until i got it very large. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tools@willy
2020 Oct 12
2
samba AD problem after re-join domain
On 10/12/2020 4:06 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 12/10/2020 02:54, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> I've been working on a Samba AD setup with a bunch of test machines - >> the one DC, and a bunch of clients. Last night, I ended up switching >> the name of the test machines temporarily (except the DC), and >> re-joining the domain (that's for another
2005 Apr 27
7
[Bug 2654] timeout is always triggered with 2.6.4
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2654 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-27 02:21 ------- The generator's setting of the ignore_timeout
2019 Jul 16
2
samba 4.8 client and 4.9 AD DC: Reducing LDAP page size from 1000 to 500 due to IO_TIMEOUT
Hello, I have an issue as stated in topic. My samba 4.8.3 file server, which is AD member frequently shows winbind errors (pasted below). From user perspective it seems to work fine, but I'm worried that I have something misconfigured and in the long run, I might run into some errors. My AD DC are running on samba 4.9.x (two of them), compiled from source with BIND as DNS backend (running on
2020 Oct 12
1
samba AD problem after re-join domain
On 12/10/2020 16:11, Jason Keltz wrote: > >> Hi Rowland, >> >> I did not leave the domain, but I did delete the entry by either the >> Windows AD tool or "samba-tool computer delete" option.? I can't >> remember which one at this point.? I think that clears up all the >> bits.? Is that correct?? On the local host, I also deleted the >>
2005 Apr 06
2
backup option
Hi, I have question about the behavior of --backup-dir with --delete-after option. In my testing with version 2.6.4, it appears that the backup option only backups altered files. Files that will be deleted on the destination system will NOT be placed in --backup-dir location. I would like to back up deleted files. Is there a way to do this? Thanks
2005 Apr 25
2
How about a --min-size option, next to --max-size
There's a rather old bug report in Debian's bug tracking system (see http://bugs.debian.org/27126) about wanting to be able to specify the maximum file size, as well as the minimum file size. Here's the text: Sometimes, it's useful to specify a file size range one is interested in. For example, I'd like to keep an up-to-date mirror of Debian, but I currently
2012 Aug 07
3
Best way to add samba4 to existing domain
I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with
2012 Mar 13
2
libvirt with sanlock
Hello, I configured libvirtd with the sanlock lock manager plugin: # rpm -qa | egrep "libvirt-0|sanlock-[01]" libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 sanlock-1.8-2.el6.x86_64 libvirt-0.9.4-23.el6_2.4.x86_64 # egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/libvirt/qemu-sanlock.conf auto_disk_leases = 1 disk_lease_dir = "/var/lib/libvirt/sanlock" host_id = 4 # mount | grep sanlock
2020 Oct 12
2
samba AD problem after re-join domain
I've been working on a Samba AD setup with a bunch of test machines - the one DC, and a bunch of clients.? Last night, I ended up switching the name of the test machines temporarily (except the DC), and re-joining the domain (that's for another e-mail later).? When things didn't work the way I had planned,? I switched the hostnames back, and re-joined the domain today on all the
2019 Jul 16
1
samba 4.8 client and 4.9 AD DC: Reducing LDAP page size from 1000 to 500 due to IO_TIMEOUT
Hello, Thank You for prompt reply! As I stated, I don't have any issues that I'm aware of, but this file server is new in my infrastructure and I was worried that something is incorrect. I set minimal logging as a habit, and I bumped winbind recently to maybe see something that would help me solve this problem. What about this: ads_search_retry: failed to reconnect (No logon servers are
2004 Jan 27
1
Differentiating debug messages from both sides
Some of the debug messages that rsync outputs (when verbose >= 2) can occur on both sides of the connection. This makes it hard to know which program is saying what. Some debug messages deal with this by outputting a "[PID]" string at the start of the message. Unfortunately, the startup message that tells us which pid is which is only output when verbose >= 3, so there's a
2017 Dec 04
2
GID range full!!
On 12/04/2017 02:15 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Possibly, if, by using the old config, Samba is ignoring the 'idmap > config DOMAIN' lines and putting everything into the '*' domain, then > you may (probably would) have more than your original set up allowed. > If this fixes it, you have found another bug ;-) > It should work with the old lines. I now
2020 Mar 02
2
Samba slow AD authentication eventually succeed
Hello, I have a customer that complains about slow AD authentication when accessing the share, eventually succeed (Samba is a DC memer) In the logs I can see the following errors: [2020/02/24 14:11:16.775884,? 1] ../source3/libads/ldap_utils.c:93(ads_do_search_retry_internal) ? Reducing LDAP page size from 1000 to 500 due to IO_TIMEOUT [2020/02/24 14:11:16.775902,? 3]
2002 Feb 05
5
SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error
Howdy, We occassionally get the following error when running our nightly backups: rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(229) This happens more on one or two machines than on any of the others. We've looked high and low to see if we're mistakenly sending these signals, but nothing is that we can find. Does anyone know what this might be from? Is it the server