similar to: acl support

Hi all, has anyone had any experience with samba3 on a X86_64 system. Are there any significant performance benefits ? cheers Stephan

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the patches directory. I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ? Thanks by advance. Following the message (a bit long): ----- itemize log follows Testing for symlinks using 'test -h' +

Hi, is there any samba error message? Please make sure that you use the parameter "valid users = REALM<winbind seperator>username". Cheers Stefan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Samba] Problems with the valid users setting in smb.conf andwinbind/AD (repost) (01-Sep-2005 10:57) From: sysrm@stvincent.ac.uk To: samba@lists.samba.org > > Hi the list

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430 Summary: Error with ACL-patch and -x on mountpoint Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: samba-bugs@digital-trauma.de

Dear rsync people, Today I tried to back up my computer using rsnapshot with the RPM version of rsync-acl 2.6.9pre1 that I built. I tried twice, and both times, rsync encountered some kind of assertion failure. I was trying to reproduce the crash with rsync-acl 2.6.9pre2 and noticed a different bug (described below); when I have a chance, I will go back and investigate the crash further. Rsync

Hi, I got the following bug report on the Debian rsync which has the ACL patch applied: On Fri 01 Dec 2006, Bryan Gartner wrote: > > When using the rltvz options to mirror files from a remote server, these > kinds of issues are reported: > > default_perms_for_dir: sys_acl_get_file(wallpaper, SMB_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT): > Function not implemented, falling back on umask >

On MacOS X 10.4.11 PPC /usr/local/bin/rsync --version rsync version 3.0.0pre9 protocol version 30.PR16 Copyright (C) 1996-2007 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv

Hi ! I am trying to use rsync to copy ACL between two Windows hosts. First, I try locally on a Windows hosting an AD. If I use rsync 3, I get this (I get the same thing with latest snapshot): -bash-3.2$ ./rsync-HEAD-20070703-1547GMT/rsync.exe -aAv copieA/ copieB sending incremental file list recv_acl_access: value out of range: ff rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

That's good, but i believe that the "allow trusted domains" must be set to "No" when using idmap_rid backend. See: http://us5.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ idmapper.html#id2587685 On Sep 19, 2005, at 10:41 AM, stefanke@micodat.com wrote: > I have fixed my problem. I do not have configured a range for the > BUILTIN domain! So the following

Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba I've used over the past couple years, which would be most. Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users I have some ACL's set up for promptly found Monday that they couldn't save new Excel files, they'd be

Dear Andrew Tridgell, i cant compile the 2.2.1-9 package --with-acl-support, beacuse HAVE_SYS_ACL_H has wrong settings somewhere. i cant fix the bug, i just comment out the #ifdef HAVE_SYS_ACL_H line in the source/include/includes.h for a (i hope) good compilation. i use acl 1.1.2 from sgi, and the latest debian woody packages. Regards. Imre Szollosi mailto:szollosi@elme.hu

Hello Samba list, we have a problem that our proprietary application sometimes can't find files on our samba share. I'm hoping for some help on this list. Our setup is two ADs as replicated domain Controller ( Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS, Version 4.1.17-SerNet-Ubuntu-10.precise) and several domain member as file servers and mixed clients (~40 x Win7, Ubuntu and OSX). The ADs use internal DNS.

Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in the rsyncd.conf file... [test] path = /home/test/greenlight # use chroot = true max connections = 3 lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock uid = 503 gid = 503 auth users = test incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx Uploading a tree from windows with

Problem is apparently with locking issues, disabled oplocks in the [general] section, and the problem actually got worse... Here's what happens: User-A part of group1, opens Excel file off of share, saves, exits... User-B (or even User-A for that matter) tries to re-open same file, get error stating it's locked and can only open for read-only access... Both users in the same group, and

Hi, I'm using 2.6.9 but I get: recv_files phase=1 generate_files phase=2 recv_files phase=2 recv_files finished generate_files phase=3 deleting in home delete_in_dir(home) [generator] make_file(home/administ,*,2) Internal error: wrong write used in receiver. _exit_cleanup(code=2, file=io.c, line=1204): entered _exit_cleanup(code=19, file=main.c, line=1182): entered rsync error: received

Destroy ACL-s on destination when no ACL-s differens between source and destination. Bug is somehow related with function send_file_name() called with negative file descriptor f. There is no such bug in 2.6.9 version, but there options "-X -A --deleted" can't be used (we have "Internal error: wrong write used in receiver."). If I fix this, avoid calling send_acl() &

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4957 Summary: rsync with acl patch crashes with fuzzy option Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ro@suse.de