similar to: Possibility of merging rsync and tar

I forward Maynard's suggestions to the list. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Maynard Handley <name99@name99.org> To: Matt McCutchen <hashproduct@verizon.net> Subject: Re: How to use multiple link-dest directories? Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:31:56 -0800 Great. That's exactly the sort of answer I wanted. I'll try it tonight. (BTW, I guess maybe it got lost since I

I wrote a patch for rsync 2.6.6 that changes two things: (1) When the receiving rsync creates a file in a directory with a default ACL and `--perms' is off, rsync uses the default ACL instead of the umask to calculate the new file's permissions. All programs that just use `open' and don't do an explicit `chmod' are forward-compatible with default ACLs, but rsync always sets

Today I went to back up my computer to an external disk with rsnapshot. I have two copies of the Linux kernel; a few files differ, but matching files are hard-linked between the two trees to save space. Since I didn't give -H to rsync, it is making a separate file on the backup disk from each hard link on the source. I had the understanding that -H used an O(n^2) algorithm to match up hard

Rsync people, Tell me if I'm wrong, but rsync seems to have a very serious race condition that would make it risky to transfer files into a directory writable by someone you don't trust if permissions are going to be granted to other people on those files. The rsync receiver creates a half-transferred file with 600 or 700 permissions; then the receiver writes the data and finalizes the

Yep I tried those two options, and nothing... Even if the pre-user conf files have a log file in the same directory, which I touch before trying, messages keep going to syslog... I tried with 666 permissions on rsyncd.log too just to make sure... The following is one of the user's conf file, hope theres a clue. Thanks! log file = /home/pluto/rsyncd.log <<< This is the problem!!

Wayne, I have redone get_local_name again (patch attached), this time to enable rsync to remove a file to make way for a destination directory; this resolves the "surprise" noted in David Tonhofer's diagram 2. I also made it obey --keep-dirlinks when looking for a destination directory and made various rearrangements. Tell me what you think, and if you decide to commit my code,

Rsync people, I am preparing to overhaul my Web site's build system, and I am looking for a convenient way to collect files and directories from various places on my computer and put them at various locations inside a destination directory to be posted to my Web site. So far, my script has been running rsync once for each source, but this is too slow. Is there a way to get rsync to collect

Wayne, Attached is a patch worth of suggested man page improvements for --no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks. I think new users would find my explanations clearer and more complete, although you may want to make additional changes. I regenerated rsync.1 and the patch includes changes to it, but my yodl is somewhat weird, so I suggest you run yodl again yourself. -- Matt McCutchen

I would like to propose some improvements to rsync's filters. (1) Add a notation that makes a pattern match both a file and everything under it if it happens to be a directory. One possibility: ending a path in //. "+ mydir//" would be equivalent to "+ mydir" "+ mydir/**". Just some syntactic sugar. (2) Add a third sender behavior to "hide" and

----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von digulla@hepe.com ----- Datum: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:05:13 +0200 Von: Aaron Digulla <digulla@hepe.com> Antwort an: Aaron Digulla <digulla@hepe.com> Betreff: Re: [feature request] Modify --backup option to make backups on source side, too An: Matt McCutchen <hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com> Quoting Matt McCutchen

Hello, i have found, that major distros (especially opensuse) ship their rsync packages with a lot of patches which i don`t find in the official rsync-patches git. Maybe there is a reason for that or i missed something or looked wrong, but for convenience/transparency i have compiled a list of those and ask if it would make sense to put them into the official rsync patches git, as most of them

Hello, I guess this question has been asked several times, but unfortenuately I don't find an answer neither in the search machines nor in the groups. I backup my windows clients using smbclient with the tar option. Works great, but no empty directories are in the created tar file. I read the smblient and tar's manpage, without finding the necessary option. Does anybody know how I can

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3596 Summary: rsync fails to retouch S_IWUSR when transferring a single empty directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:40:34AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 04.12.2018 20:02, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:03:53AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> On 03.12.2018 22:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:46:16AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >>>> Quite late, hopefully not too late. > >>>>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542 Summary: "rsync --list-only a b/" tries to create b Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:37 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Evan Cheng" <evan.cheng at apple.com>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549 Summary: rsync applies umask to some directories even when a default ACL takes effect Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Junbum Lim <junbums at gmail.com> wrote: > > > When multiple GEPs or other operations are used for the address calculation, OptimizeMemoryInst() performs address matching and determines a final addressing expression as a simple form (e.g., ptrtoint/add/inttoptr) and sinks it into user's block so that ISel could have better chance to fold address

When multiple GEPs or other operations are used for the address calculation, OptimizeMemoryInst() performs address matching and determines a final addressing expression as a simple form (e.g., ptrtoint/add/inttoptr) and sinks it into user's block so that ISel could have better chance to fold address computation into LDRs and STRs. However, OptimizeMemoryInst() seems to do this transformation

As far as I can tell, there's no built-in way to get capture.output() to capture messages (stderr) instead of stdout ... suggested, fairly trivial, patch below. f <- function() { message("abc") cat("def\n") } x <- capture.output(f()) ## prints 'abc' x ## value: "def" source("~/R/r-devel/src/library/utils/R/capture.output.R") x