similar to: probbable generator hang bug in rsync

I've gotten around to testing the generator hang bug using stunnel under 2.6.7, and I still occasionally get the same problem. It seems to be around 50% of the time. Here's some strace output from the generator and receiver from two runs, one where the generator exits properly, and one where it doesn't. Run 2 hangs indefinately. Run 1 Generator: Process 14581 attached - interrupt

I'm using rsync to backup multiple directories, i.e. rsync -azq --delete --relative /dog /cat /fish user@rsync-server::modulename Everything works fine, except if I remove a directory from the list of those being backed up, it isn't deleted on the other side. For example: rsync -azq --delete --relative /dog /cat /fish user@rsync-server::modulename /dog /cat /fish are all backed up to

For some reason I'm having a problem uploading to an rsync server: [root@csa i386]# rsync -azvv --progress --stats /home/www/www.blah.com/* blah@localhost::test/ Password: building file list ... done ERROR: module is read only unexpected EOF in read_timeout It claims my module is read only, but it is not: [test] uid = root gid = root path =

Hi list, I have 3 Citrix Xenserver 5.6  and currently building a a VM backup server. I took the xe client on one of the server and installed it on the backup server (gentoo based) installed the stunnel package to make XE work. now when running, I get this error message : [server ­~ #] ./xe help -debug -s 192.168.111.17 -u user -pw pass Connecting via stunnel to [192.168.111.17] port [443]

Are there any clients and/or servers for Windows (clients only for Win98/ME) which can use the rsync protocol, or especially rsync over SSL (e.g. like stunnel, not ssh), which would allow setting up some well controlled and secure bulk file exchanging between Windows an Unix? SMB is not going to be an option and a VPN may not be an option, either (there are technical reasons for that but they are

On my CenOS7 system with stunnel from base stunnel-4.56-4.el7.x86_64 there's a systemd service file /etc/systemd/system/stunnel.service try sudo systemctl enable stunnel.service Hope this helps, K ?al?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 devzero at web.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devzero at web.de ------- Comment #3 from devzero at web.de 2009-08-07 05:11 CST ------- wouldn`t it be better to give up on that effort

Hi everybody! I'm trying to set up a secure samba connection across the net using Stunnel. With no joy. Any assistance would be appreciated. (c: I have four PC's. My Windows PC (192.168.0.10), my firewall (192.168.0.1 & 203.36.97.5), the office firewall (202.44.170.5 & 192.168.0.1), and the office file (Samba) server (192.168.0.15). On my office firewall I have the

Hi list: I started to make a quick GemPlugin command [ssl::start] that sets up an stunnel before calling the normal [start] command. so $ mongrel_rails ssl:start will do everything that start normally does and configure/setup an stunnel. The question... Obviously this plugin will require stunnel to be installed. What do you think is the best move: 1) nothing, just require that people

Hi Thomas, El 18/12/2014 22:25, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: > > On 12/18/2014 08:54 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> >> Hello, Thomas, >> >> El 18/12/2014 21:35, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: >> > >> > On 12/18/2014 08:29 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> > > >> > >

I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of using rsync via SSL, such as with stunnel? I want to have encrypted access, either anonymous or authenticated, but without granting any SSH access to anyone (e.g. the rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 --- Comment #11 from roland <devzero at web.de> 2013-11-22 22:21:30 UTC --- from the rsync 3.1.0 release notes : Rsync now comes packaged with an rsync-ssl helper script that can be used to contact a remote rsync daemon using a piped-stunnel command. It also includes an stunnel config file to run the server side to support

Yes, I am pretty sure about that. I originally was connected via AT&T DSL but wanted the fast access of cable modem. I need permanent IPs which required me to contract with Comcast buisness. Once I switched over, I was no longer able to access my imap server, which was as I mentioned, stunnel listening on the imaps port and forwarding to dovecot listening on the imap port. I was getting

Hello, i know i'm a newbie, but here i go (help me lord), i just installed/configured samba 3.0.23d on my suse 10.1, but i have a couple of questions about what's on the manual.... 1- when trying to secure swat with ssl, i installed openssl, and then generate the certificates, but when i try to start the tunnel with: stunnel -p /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem -d 901 \ -l

Dear all, I had notice that my logwatch has a heap of stunneling like the one below. Is there a security breech? **Unmatched Entries** (1) LOG5[6504:3086657232]: Connection closed: 29433 bytes sent to SSL, 62 bytes sent to socket (1) LOG5[9516:3086649040]: stunnel 4.15 on i686-redhat-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8b 04 May 2006 (1) LOG5[9516:3086649040]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE

Greetings. Here's my setup: On the server - rsync 2.5.6 protocol version 26 stunnel 4.04 on i686-suse-linux-gnu PTHREAD with OpenSSL 0.9.7b On the client - rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29 stunnel 4.14 on i686-suse-linux-gnu UCONTEXT+POLL+IPv4+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.8a Both ends run rsync as root The rsync daemon listens on a non-default port that is only bound to 127.0.01.

On Jul 21, 2019, at 11:50, Jorge Bastos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > SSL/TLS is done via Stunnel Dirst, others have asked but I haven?t seen an answer, do you have any reason to think Outlook supports IMAP idle at all? I mean, I know outlook.com doesn?t support it, so maybe it just doesn?t work? Secondly, assuming Outlook does support IMAP idle, if you setup Dovecot to

Dovecot 2.3.4, FreeBSD 11.2 Due to comcast buisness ISP intercepting imaps I need to have my clients connect to non-standard port (9999). Previously I had been using stunnel to receive the imaps connection and forward it to the imap port over 127.0.0.1. But I would like to retire stunnel and have my imap clients connect remotely. I have configured the imap-login service - service imap-login {

Hmmm, you obviously know a lot more about systemd than I do, I'm going to have to look at what you posted more carefully. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:08:31 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Starting stunnel on boot with

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2957 ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla.samba@neufeind.net 2005-10-01 04:24 ------- Think I am experiencing the same here. @szczur: Did it work for you with another version of rsync? Are you using an stunnel between the machines or anything? Is the rsync-receiver or the sender the problem? -- Configure bugmail: