similar to: CEBA-2011:1503 CentOS 5 x86_64 ecryptfs-utils FASTTRACK Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm 381f3f7cedff81129f3a1e5d22130774 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.i386.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0cb2b6619882f6492b3c0190eace5bb4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm 7a9e58b26bc1e9bb944ba131db28cad9 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 685ff985b7e4c55879b31822f4b81bd2 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 652450acf1c7922023e7da04bc86a590 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1241 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1241.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: aa9dfe1c4fb367d7a43d76ed3c680ea4 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm af16fc4c26f57cc3328bf7b5233cdba8 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

On 10/31/2015 08:24 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r > 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs > ecryptfs 85424 0 > > [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]#

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1307 Low Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 880c55fb91b5da7be83571f90ed995c0 ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386.rpm 1dc8b59dfdfa7961103e3b91c780ea42 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-5.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1503 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1503.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: f2df06df74bff8b4fd5c7e38c60fb981867273a46295c727982cb429c603f912 docbook-style-dsssl-1.79-18.el7.noarch.rpm Source:

I shared raid 5 array which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01 -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba server,

Hi , I shared linux directory which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark  . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01  -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba

hi guys I have a lxc guest on Dell's R815(AMD Opterons) which I just moved to an ecryptfs mounted folder(using centosplus' kernel C7.5) Copying data to that folder seems to work just fine, but I as soon as I start the quest, the host gets shot in the head almost immediately, hard reboot, no dump. I also have another, virtually identical guest but on Intel platform and that one does

hi guys I have a lxc guest on Dell's R815(AMD Opterons) which I just moved to an ecryptfs mounted folder(using centosplus' kernel) Copying data to that folder seems to work just fine, but I as soon as I start the quest the host gets shot in the head, hard reboot, no dump. I also have another, virtually identical guest but on Intel platform and that one does not do anything but runs

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1094 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1094.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6e589a2ce1106eea61a985c8ef9ba8fd8730b67707f6789196d4e5c8d4293519 pm-utils-1.2.5-10.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1145 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1145.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 15c35992c87221538ebdb1469c48931aafb42c6f37d8e1456ca80070779a72f7 pm-utils-0.99.3-14.el5.i386.rpm 681922b4ac55098b25f8130bce63e004d04feb4f874286810f985a785b0a87d2

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1321 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1321.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 76bdc4c1eefa656fba8add8bdd4aacddc3127254e17d7ca1b48db2e812dd551f docbook-utils-0.6.14-25.el6.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0768 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0768.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f9238919a8e55753462b1690cc36a16b0a0c29260663dd5fe3e9ee0ae7a187c9 edac-utils-0.9-15.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1191 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1191.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8a5accffef27e51392c7188797cb3e23836c0bc83c4f0e204adac58b0721d7e3 shadow-utils-4.1.5.1-15.el7.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1250 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1250.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: b9c29f7b0ba54129f929a2943c9ed3acc927ec60eb091ed534e8e0edc302a1aa pm-utils-1.4.1-27.el7.x86_64.rpm

I am now investigating encrypting our IMAP user spool files. Does anyone have experience with handling encrypted data stores using either or both of the subject methods and would care tio share their observations? Which is the preferred method (I know: it depends, but on what?)? What administrative pain does each cause? Our IMAP host is a KVM guest so spinning up a duplicate and simply