similar to: Static routes with a metric?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi All I have two hosts. Host A and Host B Host A routing table ------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.29.110.0 172.29.109.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 172.29.109.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0

Hello folks.. Does any of you know if it is possible to rewrite the ip src in a packet. I have a problem involving a DMZ with external IP addresses routed trough a single WAN IP. When the server initiates a connection, it looks like it comes from the WAN ip instead of it''s designated External IP routed through the WAN. So in short, Is it possible to rewrite the packet in the router,

Weird behaviour. A couple of days ago I installed another DSL router. During the process I have somehow caused the default gw route to disappear - on system start up the interface comes up fine, I can see and connect to the local subnet but not to the internet. [rkampen at timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref

Hi, We have a little over 100 servers, almost all running CentOS 5.7. Virtually all are Dell servers, generally a mix of 1950s, R610s, and R410s. We use NTP and/or PTP to sync their clocks. One phenomenon we've noticed is that (1) on reboot, the clocks are all greatly out of sync, and (2) if the PTP or NTP process is stopped, the clocks start drifting very quickly. If it was isolated to

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

my network: local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A( 192.168.1.1/24&11.22.33.44pppoe&10.10.10.1/24 tinc)<---remote B: 10.10.20.1/24 ^ | remote C:10.10.0.1/24 all running tinc 1.0.x, ADSL router

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

Hi R-devel. Is the following behavior in g1() and h1() expected? It seems to make "..." arguments work slightly differently from named arguments. #missing() has the property that it looks "up the chain" #for example, "z" can be missing in f3 even if #that argument did have a name ("y") in f2 f1 <- function(x, ...) { cat("In f1, missing(x) is

Hello all I am setting up a Centos 6 machine with one network card & one onboard network port. Both are recognized & work. Onboard Network port is unused yet, but is required for dedicated access to LTSP LAN, which would allow older PIII machines to boot from this system. I have installed LTSP but again Networking seems to be the problem area, as the clients won't boot from this

Hello All, I took a break from trying to get Tinc working and have come back to it now with the release of 1.0.11. I have 2 Windows computers connected behind firewalls and everything seems to be correct, except I cannot seem to get any data past the server TAP interface. I can ping the Server TAP interface from the client, but no data will move through the TAP interface to the Internet. I have

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 ------- Additional Comments From mzurakowski-bin@data.pl 2006-02-21 20:06 MET ------- In ip route add .../29 it should be /24 of course. I think that source routing is setup correctly: I can ping/connect to my router through both interfaces from outside no matter how I setup default routing on it. Marcin Z -- Configure bugmail:

hi everyone! i've got a problem in optimizing the following function fun <- function(theta){ theta <- rbind(beta,lambda) fun <- sum(exp(h(beta)%*%lambda)) fun } where h(beta) is h <- function(beta,...){ g1 <- matrix(0,b,M) g2 <- matrix(0,b,M) h1 <- matrix(0,b,1) h2 <- matrix(0,b,1) for(f in 1:M){ for(F in 1:b){ g1[F,f] <-

--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP | my | router1 | | | linux | | | router2 ------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal

#I have a data set that looks like this. A bit more complicated actually with # three factor levels but these calculations need to be done on one factor at a #I then have a set of different rates that are applied #to it. #dataset cata <- c( 1,1,6,1,1,2) catb <- c( 1,2,3,4,5,6) doga <- c(3,5,3,6,4, 0) data1 <- data.frame(cata, catb, doga) rm(cata,catb,doga) data1 # start rates #

I want to add the following route command route add -net 192.168.2.0/27 gw 192.168.2.3 via the normal network setup. The result should be the following routing table (the first line): 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 scope link 192.168.2.0/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 192.168.2.0/27 dev xenbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.3 192.168.1.0/24 dev xenbr0

Hello. I'm trying to find a way in R to calculate between and within subject variances and confidence intervals for some analytical method development data. I've found a reference to a method in Burdick, R. K. & Graybill, F. A. 1992, Confidence Intervals on variance components, CRC Press. This example is for Balanced Data confidence interval calculation from Pg 62. The data are

Hi, I'm a new R user and would appreciate your help regarding the following: Can I create a matrix whose elements are n functions of a vector x? In my problem I have 3 vectors (a,b,c) with elements a=[f1(x) f2(x)....fn(x)]; b=[g1(x) g2(x)....gn(x)]; c=[h1(x) h2(x)....hn(x)]. I need to create a final function that looks like: f(x)=f1(x)*g1(x)*h1(x)+.....+fn(x)*gn(x)*hn(x). (f(x) is my

I hope any of you shorewall freaks would be able to help me with my problem. First a little network description: I have two zones: WAN net = eth0 (One IP address from my Internet Service Provider) LAN loc = eth1 (192.168.23.0/24) Default gateway (the Internet) for the local clients are 192.168.23.2 (the IP address of eth1) I have used all the guides at the homepage of Shorewall,