similar to: e2fsck message "inode is too big"

Hi I'm experiencing some problems on a harddisk (it has crashed for no known reason), and in pursuit of getting some of the data out of the disk I'm learning to use the e2fs progs package. Origianlly I used version 1.38, but after experiencing segfaults in e2fsck -which now is solved, I upgraded to 1.39, but now I have hit another problem (on another partition): The partition was

Am 25.09.18 um 14:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:12:18 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > >>>>>>>> dc01:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs >>>>>>>> Checking 4503 objects >>>>>>>> SID S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041-1601 for >>>>>>>>

Hello list, I'm getting a weird error message regarding our file server when i run dbcheck on my dc01 running Samba v4.7.9. The error only occurs on dc01, dc02 is fine, the file server also works fine but I want to clean the database before doing the upgrade to version 4.9 dc01:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4503 objects SID S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041-1601 for

Am 25.09.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:08:00 +0200 > Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: > >> Am 25.09.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:18:03 +0200 >>> Daniel Jordan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33

Am 25.09.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:18:03 +0200 > Daniel Jordan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: >>> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 13:51 +0200, Daniel Jordan via samba wrote: >>>> Hello list, >>>> >>>> I'm

Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 13:51 +0200, Daniel Jordan via samba wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I'm getting a weird error message regarding our file server when i >> run >> dbcheck on my >> dc01 running Samba v4.7.9. The error only occurs on dc01, dc02 is >> fine, >> the file server also

dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(objectClass=domain)' objectSid # record 1 dn: DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx objectSid: S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041 dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(objectClass=rIDSet)(cn=RID Set))' rIDAllocationPool # record 1 dn: CN=RID Set,CN=DC01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx rIDAllocationPool:

hi, i have a tricky situation here and and don't know where to start with the solution. i happened to set up a linux system, but i had to install the base system on another machine. i used e2fsprogs 1.30-WIP (30-Sep-2002) for this. now the machine is up and running, but i have to use e2fsprogs 1.27 (8-Mar-2002). it's a debian system and i wanted to stay sane & stable, hence using

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I got an IDE-drive which decided to get broken. Part of the extended partition table was lost, but I was able to recover it, so I could reach the ext3 filesystem with a size of about 135 GB. I made a copy of it (luckily the ISP doesn't seem to need the broken drive urgently hehe) and ran fsck on that copy. The first time I ran fsck I

Hello, I am running kernel 2.6.4 on XScale/ARM with BusyBox. Quite frequently after shutdown I have a number of orphaned inodes on the ext3 filesystem. (I have yet to figure out the precise cause of the orphans, but I believe it has to do with umount failing at shutdown due to a bug in BusyBox init that does not properly kill processes.) It is my understanding the orphaned inode list should be

Am 26.09.18 um 20:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:29:26 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 14:47 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:28:42 +0200 >>> Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> dc01:~#

Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.

I've run ext3 filesystems for the last few years and I've never seen this question answered..... If a system shutsdown hard, even with journaling is it at all necessary to run e2fsck? Just curious.... Thanks -- Sam Williams samurai at acm.org +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +"It is easy to be

e2fsck returns 1 in case of "file system errors corrected". We treat it as success in normal e2fsck, but fail if e2fsck is run by resize2fs. Change 'manual' execution of e2fsck to dedicated function call. --- daemon/ext2.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/ext2.c b/daemon/ext2.c index 5dd67c7..95a65ae 100644 ---

Helping a friend fix a computer that was having severe, weird troubles. Reformatted (from XP) and installed Fedora. Install went ok, on first boot, however, filesystem was READONLY for some reason. Knew hard drive was suspect, so I e2fsck'd it over and over all night long, fall asleep next to the computer. This morning, Fedora boots fine, login not a problem, so I shut down and fsck it again,

We have CENTOS 5.5 run on DELL server.?? Due to power system crash, server been down and up. I would like use 'e2fsck" to check file systems. Does there has way to run "e2fsck" under following conditions: 1. file systems are all ext3 2. file systems must mount. 3. e2fsck only scan file system but NO modify Thanks.

How big is a file that e2fsck considers it to be a large file? 814611 blocks used (42.79%) 0 bad blocks 1 large file <----- that Thanks John Nelson

Hello, on my ext3 fs I have a file that I can not modify anymore: $ who am i root pts/0 Nov 18 19:42 (192.168.10.110) $ ls -al /mnt/path/usage_200306.html -rw-r-xrw- 1 50946 nobody 99935 Jul 1 2003 /mnt/path/usage_200306.html $ rm /mnt/path/usage_200306.html rm: remove regular file `/mnt/path/usage_200306.html'? y rm: cannot remove `/mnt/path/usage_200306.html': Operation

Hi! I had problem yesterday with e2fsck. It reported a bad superblock. I then tried to use one of the other superblocks. To no avail. Then later I remembered that I had switched the fs type to xfs. Maybe e2fsck could recognize other common fs types, and report this instead? best regards keld

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:46:02 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I now changed the value to 0 and rebooted. > > > > After that fsck based on Interval setting were done. > > > > Unfortunately that is not true for the root partition. > > For that I had to use maxCount settings to